Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantP = 0.0060.1× alphaqualifiedgold
serricorne showed significant relative preferences for paeonal at doses of 1 μg ( χ 2 = 4.261, df = 1, P = 0.039), 10 μg ( χ 2 = 5.565, df = 1, P = 0.018), and 1000 μg ( χ 2 = 5.000, df = 1, P = 0.025), and highly significant relative preferences at doses of 100 μg ( χ 2 = 7.681, df = 1, P = 0.006) and 500 μg ( χ 2 = 10.083, df = 1, P = 0.001), when compared with mineral oil (Fig. 3 ).
showed a trendp = 0.0060.1× alpha
Renal function-related indices also demonstrated significant associations, with serum creatinine levels decreasing significantly ( p < 0.001) with increasing α-klotho levels, from 82.20 ± 55.43 umol/L in Q1 to 68.35 ± 25.71 umol/L in Q4; similarly, uric acid levels showed a significant decreasing trend ( p < 0.001) from 336.06 in Q1 ± 85.56 umol/L to 289.05 ± 82.82 umol/L in Q4.Blood urea nitrogen likewise showed a trend of negative correlation ( p = 0.006) with α-klotho level from 5.13 ± 2.33 mmol/L in Q1 to 4.57 ± 1.67 mmol/L in Q4.
markedly significantp = 0.0060.1× alphaqualified
1 – 3 ), the EEFBs removed almost 53.1% ± 1.13% of the TN with a concentration of up to 6.56 ± 0.20 mg L −1 , and the net removal rate of EEFBs and EFBs were 40.9% ± 1.13% and 14.5% ± 1.19%, which represent a markedly significant difference in the TN removal ( p = 0.006).
highly significantp = 0.0070.1× alphaqualifiedgold
The microbiome composition is associated with rectal mucosal inflammation, and distinct inflammation-associated bacterial guilds were identified in the rectal mucosa of MSM engaging in RAI and controls LDM analyses demonstrated a highly significant global association ( p = 0.007) between the microbiome composition by relative abundance and the 12C IS.
marginally non-significantP = 0.0070.1× alpha
First, the association between variation in hissing behaviour and exon 13 SNP66 genotype was significant before, and marginally non-significant after, controlling for FRD in the overdominant effect model (0.28 ± 0.10; P = 0.007; P.adjust = 0.054), where SNP66 genotype explained 1.3% of the total variance in hissing behaviour (R 2 m = 0.013).