Excerpts

The difference between the irradiated and non-irradiated group was highly significant ( P = 0.002).

Nevertheless, despite the reduced number of subjects, we still observed a highly significant ventriloquist effect for invisible trials (experiment 1: 0.07 ± 0.02, t(27) = 3.22, p = 0.002; Cohen’s d: 0.61 ± 0.54; experiment 2: 0.08 ± 0.03, t(12) = 2.84, p = 0.007; Cohen’s d: 0.79 ± 0.8) (Fig. 2 ).

Body boundaries showed highly significant correlations with both ‘altered experience’ (r = − 0.419, p = 0.002) and `altered state’ (r = − 0.417, p = 0.003).

A Mantel test performed on a matrix of pairwise geographic distances and a matrix of pairwise values of G ′′ ST was highly significant ( R xy = 0.385, P = 0.002), indicating that genetic structure can be described by a pattern of isolation by geographic distance.

In contrast, among prefecture women, a declining trend was observed before 2018 (APC = − 1.25%, P = 0.001), which shifted to an increasing trend after 2018 (APC = 0.82%, P = 0.002).

The linear predictor for minutes spent in REM was marginally significant ( p = 0.067) whereas the quadratic predictor was highly significant (Fig. 4b ; p = 0.002).

The results of the subsequent PERMANOVA agreed with the initial analyses and again revealed a highly significant effect of the region of S. cerevisiae isolation on these wine phenotypes (Region: R 2 = 0.127, P = 0.002; Table 1b ).

This difference was highly significant (not one of 500 random character deletion replicates had lower node recovery than the simulated fossilization aggregate, giving P = 0.002).

The correlation between ash content and N 2 O emissions was highly significant (r 2 = 0.809; P = 0.002).

With highly significant results for all metrics (e.g., accuracy p = 0.002, AUC p = 0.001), SVM performs significantly better than Decision Tree, even when the strict Bonferroni-adjusted significance threshold (α = 0.003) is applied.

In contrast, after irradiation with 2 Gy we have found a highly significant induction of DNA damage using neutral and alkaline comet assay (t-test, p = 0.002 and 0.000002, respectively).

The spatial frequency threshold, a measure of visual behavior, showed a highly significant decrease in Herc3 -/- mice (Fig. 5 a, p = 0.002) compared to Herc3 + / + mice.

Analysis of the first 15-min time-window only, the point at which morphine-induced locomotion was typically largest, revealed a highly significant drug × day interaction [F(3,18) = 7.35; p = 0.002], reflecting the widening difference between saline and drug days as conditioning progressed: activity increased across morphine days, but decreased across saline days.

Similarly, to attentional and behavioral response, the interaction was highly significant: nomDF/denDF = 3/4089, F = 5.11, p = 0.002.

A highly significant correlation was found between DLQI and HECSI scores ( p = 0.002) (Fig. 1 a) and between TEWL and HECSI scores ( p = 0.034) (Fig. 1 b).

The extent of cysteine oxidation varied with cysteine residue position and was highly significant in YIC (SO3H) ENQDSISSK ( P < 0.002 ), RPC (SO3H) FSALEVDETYVPK ( P < 0.03 ) and ALVLIAFAQYLQQC (SO3H) PFEDHVK ( P < 0.02 ), as analyzed by ANOVA.

Individuals that heard predator vocalizations 7 days previously demonstrated a highly significant (Fig. 2a ; F 1,8 = 21.0, P = 0.002), 48% greater level of ΔFosB immunoreactivity (positive cells/mm 2 ) in the amygdala than did those that heard non-predator vocalizations 7 days previously, as well as a highly significant (Fig. 2b ; F 1,8 = 12.1, P = 0.008), 42% greater level of ΔFosB immunoreactivity in the hippocampus (n = 6 predator and 6 non-predator individuals).

Overall, there was a highly significant correlation between read abundance generated by the two primer sets for each FT in the datasets (R = 0.37, p = 0.002, see Supplementary Information Fig.

Cutting speed itself contributed 20.99% and was highly significant (F = 539.29, p = 0.002).

A highly significant increase in granulocyte count (GRA#) was observed among the exposed group with a p-value of p = 0.002.

In the meta analysis for the outcome measure according to infarct volume, efficacy of G-Rg1 showed a little significant reducing the infarct volume compared with nimodipine group (n = 44, WMD -4.65, 95% CI: -7.59 to -1.72, P = 0.002; heterogeneity:Chi 2 = 0.72, p = 0.70, I 2 = 0%, Figure 5B ).

Only two correlations survived FDR correction for multiple comparisons, with a third being marginally significant: A negative correlation of Antisocial Attitudes with Stomach Activation (ρ = − 0.21, p = 0.002, p FDR = 0.03) and with Heart Activation (ρ = − 0.19, p = 0.003, p FDR = 0.03), and an almost-significant negative correlation of Impulsivity with Head Activation (ρ = − 0.17, p = 0.01, p FDR = 0.06; Fig. 2 c).

ANCOVA analysis indicated a highly significant main effect of the “water” (p = 0.002) whereas the effects of “irradiance” or “origin” were not significant.

This result is highly significant ( p = 0.002), highlighting the role of soil fertility management in enhancing agricultural productivity.

Due to our modest sample size, most of our results did not reach statistical significance after adjusting for multiple testing with Bonferroni correction (P < 2.08 × 10 −3 ) and warrant replication in independent Mexican pediatric populations ( Supplementary Table S1 ).