Excerpts

The latency to find the reward during the retrieval trials revealed a highly significant training effect (Fig. 1 d, F 2.9,66.9 = 6.45, p = 0.001) and the linear trend was also significant (F 1,23 = 14.94, p = 0.001).

Differences in maximum length distributions were highly significant among matrices (KW, H = 163.5, p < 0.001).

Molecular mapping of QTLs associated with seed-Fe and Zn concentrations A highly significant difference (P < 0.001) of seed-Fe (51.3 ± 5.0, 40.3–67.0 ppm with 81% H 2 ) and Zn (36.0 ± 3.8, 27.9–48.5 ppm with 83% H 2 ) concentrations in two parental accessions and 277 individuals of a RIL mapping population [ICC 4958 (Fe: 43.0 ± 2.9 and Zn: 30.2 ± 2.5 ppm) × ICC 8261 (Fe: 64.8 ± 3.3 and Zn: 42.0 ± 2.7 ppm)] across two years based on ANOVA was observed ( Table S3 , Fig. 3A,B ).

In the 7 DAI, a highly significant abundance of GA 12 was observed in the laser-irradiated seeds than control with a fold change of 0.13 (*** p < 0.001) and found consistently higher in the irradiated seeds with a fold change of 0.10,0.13 and 0.03 respectively (* p < 0.05) (Fig. 6 c) in 14–28 DAI.

Even with non-cooperative subjects included in the human sample, there was a clearly significant between-species difference in the group analysis both between Experiment 1 and 2 (W = 175, p = 0.001) and between Experiment 2 and 3 (W = 177, p = 0.03).

The model had high discriminatory capacity (C-statistic 0.85) and compared with the null model there were highly significant differences (χ 2 = 165.1, p < 0.001).

The average weight in the normal group was 56.4 kg, while in the obese group, it was 92.0 kg, demonstrating a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).

The KMO measure of sampling adequacy was 0.873, and Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating that the sampling of the variables was adequate.

Comparing groups I and II, the average values of the three parameters are clearly very different, differences which remain highly significant even when the scatter is accounted for (p < 0.001 in the Kruskal-Wallis test, see also Materials and Methods ).

Although most sectors in both groups showed a trend of decreasing thickness, statistically significant reductions were observed only in the inferotemporal ( P < 0.001) and inferonasal ( P = 0.003) sectors in Group 2 (Fig. 2 ).

1 A, there were no significant age differences across groups (one-way ANOVA, p = 0.507); however, sex differences were highly significant (Chi-squared tests, p < 0.001): while a majority of participants from the no tinnitus group were female (~ 57%), ~ 85% of those with chronic tinnitus were male (Fig. 1 B).

= 0.297 and is statistically highly significant (p < 0.001).

Both crossing types, w + FF x w + MM and w + FF x w − MM were compared with a t-test (unpaired), and highly significant differences were observed, p < 0.001.

7 ), with a highly significant difference from the negative control ( p < 0.001).

In the OSA subgroup there was a highly significant and strong correlation between the AHI and the KREI (r = 0.823; p < 0.001), and a significant moderate correlation in HV (r = 0.647; p = 0.013) and in RLS patients (r = 0.616; p = 0.025).

Compared to 2008–2018 TC monthly means in the inside region, these elevations were statistically significant in December (W = 43, Z = − 3.16, p = 0.002, r = 0.47) and statistically highly significant in January (W = 79, Z = − 3.90, p < 0.001, r = 0.47), February (W = 62, Z = − 4.06, p < 0.001, r = 0.51), and March (W = 148, Z = − 3.92, p < 0.001, r = 0.46) (Supplementary Table S4 ).

The most frequently used rules regarding the value of the test probability (p) were adopted, proving the statistical significance of the relationship under consideration: p < 0.05 means a statistically significant relationship; p < 0.01 means a highly significant relationship; p < 0.001 means a very highly statistically significant relationship.

Indeed, for NH 4 + -N and total organic N, all individual treatments, all two-way interactions and the three-way interaction were highly significant ( P < 0.001; Supplementary Table 2 ).

Furthermore, Pearson correlation analysis between DMR methylation of these genes was also detected to be highly significant among these groups ‘r’ being 0.99 (p < 0.001), 0.83 (p < 0.05) and 0.82 (p < 0.05) for SNRPN vs PEG10 , SNRPN vs MEST and PEG10 vs MEST respectively.

A one-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant main effect of anatomical site on intercalated duct diameter (F(5, 54) = 409.4, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.974).

The origin of the near-significant three-way interaction from the overall analysis was therefore, the dominant data, in which the significant main effect of modality F(2,44) = 10.690), p = 0.001 was modulated by a near-significant interaction with experiment F(2,44) = 8.169), p = 0.07.

The impact of seat layout on time was highly significant (all p -values < 0.001), with all-longitudinal seats taking the least amount of time compared to other layout styles in both evacuation and boarding/alighting scenarios (all p -values < 0.001).

Mixed linear model analysis of these data showed that the hyperopic shift induced by red light was highly significant ( P < 0.001) while the refractive change under blue light was not significant ( P = 0.49).

The distributions of the Coc and SD groups were significantly different from each other, while Coc + SD was not significantly different than either, although the comparison with Coc reached a trend towards significance (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Coc vs SD p = 0.001 , Coc vs Coc + SD p = 0.058 , Coc + SD vs SD p = 0.28 ).

Broad sense heritability estimated was 0.53, with highly significant genotypic variance ( P value ≤ 0.001).