Although the Asian group contains only eight samples, the comparison with white patients is extremely significant ( p < 0.001).
Excerpts
The ANOVA analysis revealed highly significant variation (P ≤ 0.001) among genotypes (Table 3 ).
We also assessed whether the prevalence of subclasses was the same or different across genders and found that overall difference in the prevalence was highly significant (p < 0.001) (Table 3 ).
Inter-subject correlations were significant for all categories, with the exception of ‘engaged’, which was approaching significance: distracted, t(1860) = 3.57, p < 0.001, n = 1861; reflecting, t(2374) = 2.79, p = 0.005, n = 2375; engaged, t(2591) = 1.51, p = 0.13, n = 2592); immersed, t(1824) = 3.23, p = 0.001, n = 1825.
A total of 14 402 genes, belonging to profiles 0, 6, and 7, showed highly significant differences (p-value < 0.001), and the remaining 5088 genes, belonging to profiles 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, showed no significant differences (p-value > 0.05) from DS to BS and from BS to FS.
The three-group structure revealed (1) the Mediterranean and eastern Atlantic, including the Azores (hereafter designated as ATL/MED), (2) Canary Islands, Madeira and Cape Verde archipelagos (hereafter designated as ILS) and (3) Mauritania (hereafter designated as MAU) is supported by the highest highly significant Φ ct- AMOVA (0.76, p < 0.001) of the several groups tried (results not shown).
A one-sided t-test to determine whether the difference between the predicted and actual chronological age was less than 2.0 years was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Seven days after injection, a highly significant 2.5-fold decrease of histological lesion area was observed in TA muscles of mice treated with the vPMO, as compared to untreated hIMEP DUX4 mice ( p < 0.001) (Fig. 9 ).
As evident in Table 2 , the use of the 11 NTRA parameters in each logistic regression model yielded high overall model significance to each cardiac pathophysiology (p < 0.001), and both age and sex were indeed highly significant confounders (p < 0.001).
Furthermore, the interaction between nuclease and nucleic acid type was also highly significant (p < 0.001) with TALENs and DNA being the most efficient combination ( Fig.
The regression model terms were found to be highly significant (P-value < 0.001) for all three nano-powders, showing their robust predictive competency.
In the LC group, the effect of condition on mean body temperature was highly significant (F = 1152.74, P < 0.001).
Highly significant (p < 0.001) DEG events between OF and DR over time included T-box genes involved in heart development ( tbx2a/3a ), regulation of glucose ( fam132a ), membrane component ( chst2b ), regulation of vascular permeability ( src ), transmembrane transport ( slc6a17 ), metabolic process ( pah ), retinoic acid regulation ( nr2f5) and axon guidance ( arl3l1 , ntn1a , tnc ).
A decreasing trend was found for SUA levels in the XO quartiles (p < 0.001).
To further account for the distributional characteristics of the data, a generalized linear model (GLM) with a Gamma distribution and log link function was applied, which confirmed a highly significant treatment effect (Wald χ2 = 131.11, df = 3, p < 0.001).
As in the acute MI group, differences for control-remote, control-infarct and remote-infarct areas were highly significant (p < 0.001) (Table S1 ).
For each indicator of both species, the results of this test were highly significant ( p < 0.001 ), denoting that the indicator distributions are not similar among all resolutions.The effect size, or the agreement between values of indicators on each mesh, was computed with the Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (W).
Follow-up testing to investigate the cessation in modulation due to the deactivation observed at uncertain 64 nb stimuli (Figs S4p and S6o ) revealed highly significant differences from the original excerpts for: sad emotion right hemisphere response to 64 nb ( t 3 = 4.58, p < 0.001), sad emotion left hemisphere response to 64 nb ( t 3 = 10.74, p < 0.001), happy emotion right hemisphere response to 64 nb ( t 3 = 6.63, p < 0.01), and happy emotion left hemisphere response to 64 nb ( t 3 = 5.47, p < 0.001).
Negative correlations between temperature and DO were highly significant (p < 0.001), and highly significant positive correlations was found between NH 4 + and DIN (p < 0.001, Fig. 7 ).
The area exhibits a highly significant positive correlation (p < 0.001) of 0.98 with length, while its correlation with perimeter and width is also highly significant at the 0.001 level, measuring 0.99 and 0.97, respectively.
One-Way ANOVA indicated highly significant effects of model variant on Clean Accuracy (F = 26.21, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.019), Adversarial Accuracy (F = 168.39, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.112), and Robustness Drop (F = 124.28, p < 0.001).
Its coefficient—in the detection probability submodel—was strongly negative and highly significant (Tables S3 : − 3.38 for the position on the ground, P < 0.001).
In the OSA subgroup there was a highly significant and strong correlation between the AHI and the KREI (r = 0.823; p < 0.001), and a significant moderate correlation in HV (r = 0.647; p = 0.013) and in RLS patients (r = 0.616; p = 0.025).
The differences in AUCs between the models were highly significant (P < 0.001), even after controlling for multiple comparisons.
Green conservation status bird species (species with the lowest conservation priority) were more recorded than amber (higher conservation priority) or red status (highest conservation priority) although the relationship was not quite significant at the 0.05 level for iRecord: GiGL, F (1,227) = 10.4, p < 0.001; iSpot, F (1,126) = 6.7, p < 0.001; iRecord, F (1,71) = 2.9, p = 0.06.