The difference between AUC 5–55 of the two probes was statistically highly significant ( p = 0.0007).
Excerpts
However, we noted a highly significant interaction between line and diet in terms of final body weight ( P = 7.10 –4 ), specific growth rate ( P = 8.10 –3 ) and voluntary feed intake ( P = 5.10 –7 ).
24 hpi We identified no significantly enriched GO terms at 24 hpi that met our criteria ( q < 0.05); however, the term “oxidoreductase activity, acting on the CH–CH group of donors” was marginally significant ( p = 0.000739 and q = 0.06498).
A highly significant positive correlation between maintaining attention and motivation was found (Spearman correlation, R = 0.53, p = 0.0008).
These differences were found to be highly significant ( p = 0.0008) with a Fisher’s Exact test.
The upregulation of TOR1B was highly significant in patients with BM ( p = 8e-04 and p = 4.5e-05, metastatic vs. nonmetastatic BC, E-MTAB-365 and GSE2034 datasets, respectively) (Fig. 2 ).
The model was found to be highly significant ( p = 0.0008), with R 2 = 0.9524 and Adj-R 2 = 0.8913, indicating a good fit to the experimental data and good predictive capabilities.
A pooled analysis of all data showed a highly significant effect of colony environment on aggression (analysis of z-scores: whole model: F 18,982 = 2.43, P < 0.0008, foster colony aggression level: F 1 = 17.3, P < 0.0001, worker genotype: F 17 = 1.6, P < 0.069; the interaction term was non-significant and so excluded).
The two groups showed a highly significant difference in overall survival (log‐rank p = 0.00085 Supplementary Fig. 1), with 5‐year overall survival rates of 98.1% and 87.4%, respectively.
Regarding oral agmatine treatment, one-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference between the four dose groups ( P < 0.0009) with dose-dependent increases (2–7 folds) and higher agmatine levels at the 600 ( P < 0.01) and 900 ( P < 0.001) mg/kg doses.
post-earthquake differences in species abundance were highly significant ( Supplementary Table 3 ; pairwise tests after significant one-way PERMANOVA: 1997 vs. 2012: P = 0.0009; 2005 vs. 2012: P = 0.0015), while differences between the two pre-seismic samplings remained non-significant (1997 vs. 2005: P = 0.5131).
At Day 12, highly significant reductions were observed in tumor width (*** p = 0.0009), length (** p = 0.0017), and volume (*** p = 0.0007) relative to control, whereas the tablet showed only modest effects on width (* p = 0.036) and volume (* p = 0.0379) and no significant effect on length ( p = 0.2243).
While shoot biomass was still positively correlated with root parameters and transpiration, an increasing root-to-shoot ratio had a highly significant and negative correlation with transpiration ( r =-0.7, p = 0.0009).
This observation was supported by the extremely significant quantitative difference in the H 2 O 2 production before and after passing the phase transition point: R = 0.7124, p < 0.0009 (n = 18) (Table 5 ).
This time, the sTIL densities were highly significant (PFS log-rank p = 0.0009) (Table 2 C).
Statistically significant differences were observed in the plasma N -glycome at all stages of CRC, this included a highly significant decrease in relation to the core fucosylated bi-antennary glycans F(6)A2G2 and F(6)A2G2S(6)1 ( P < 0.0009).
None of the recurrent smokers continued smoking during the study period and showed a highly significant difference ( p = 0.0009) when compared with the non-recurrent smokers.
GO analysis of the genes identified in REG4 and GATA6 knockdown cells revealed a highly significant enrichment for probe sets annotated as “cell cycle phase” ( P = 9.7 × 10 −4 ).
schimperi R., leaf size had a highly significant impact on the response ( F = 58.91 , p = 0.001 ), whereas extraction time had no significant effect ( p = 0.067 ).
= 0.297 and is statistically highly significant (p < 0.001).
The Mann-Whitney test demonstrated a highly significant difference in these salivary pH values ( P < 0.001).
A two-way ANOVA model explained 96% of variance in EDI-3-RF with all main effects (group: F(1, 156) = 4200; p < 0.001; gender: F(1, 156) = 123; p < 0.001), and the interaction was highly significant (F(1, 156) = 105; p < 0.001).
In a comparison among equipopulated groups for the signal power before normalization, the occipital electrode showed a significant ( p < .05) RMS increase in the “initial” set of measurements after deafening as compared to those “before” deafening, and a highly significant ( p < .001) increase in the “last” set of measurements after deafening as compared to those “before” deafening (Fig. 2 A).
Breed was highly significant at all analyzed timepoints (p < 0.001).
The effect of life cycle stage is highly significant based on a randomization of samples with respect to life cycle stages in RDA (pseudo-F = 17.6, p = 0.001).