Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Testing the mean sensitivity and PPV across datasets of each species for significance, we find that classification results are always highly significant ( p < 0.01, for group level permutation testing against classification performance for Markov chain simulations, see Methods: Statistical Analysis), with mean ± STD sensitivity in the model: 0.99, rat: 0.73 ± 0.07, or human: 0.45 ± 0.15, and PPV in the model: 0.99, rat: 0.79 ± 0.16, or human: 0.56 ± 0.10.
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Moreover, there was a highly significant correlation between decreased cAMP and PRL release when cells were treated with DA (coefficient of correlation R = 0.99; p < 0.01), while for ARI this correlation was weaker (R = 0.81, p > 0.01), reflecting dissociation in the concentration-dependent effects on PRL release and cAMP production.
highly significantP < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
A glaucomatous VF defect was defined as (1) glaucoma hemifield test results outside normal limits; (2) more than three significant (P < 0.05) and one highly significant (P < 0.01) non-edge contiguous points on the same side of the horizontal meridian as in the pattern deviation plot; or (3) a pattern standard deviation (PSD) < 5% in an otherwise normal VF.
highly significantP < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
A comparative study of the stoichiometric characteristics of N, P, C, N:P, C:N, and C: P among fish with different diets showed that in the upstream reservoir area, there were no significant differences in N and C: N content among omnivorous, carnivorous, and filter-feeding fish ( P > 0.05), while significant or highly significant differences were observed in P (F = 6.589, P < 0.01), C (F = 8.069, P < 0.01), N: P (F = 4.101, P < 0.05), and C: P (F = 11.157, P < 0.01) among fish with different diets.
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
After dynamic constant load inspiratory muscle training, there was a highly significant increase in FVC compared to the pre-training period ( p < 0.01), as well as a significant improvement in FVC in the constant-load group ( p < 0.05), and the difference between the two groups was significant after 4 weeks of training.