Barely Significant

Excerpts

3,691 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
After the phylogenetically independent contrasts (PICs), the negative linear relationships were still significant in 2018 (R 2 = 0.34, p < 0.05) and marginally significant in 2019 (R 2 = 0.45, p = 0.06), which indicated that the phylogenetic effect did not change the trade-off relationships ( Table S1 ).
marginally significantp ≥ 0.061.2× alphagold
For the lower part of the stem (below 2 m), statistically significant differences in relative volume growth were observed based on the length of the bark stripping scars ( p = 0.02); however, in the case of full stem volume and the upper section of the tree, the differences were marginally significant ( p ≥ 0.06–0.09).
only marginally significantp = 0.0661.3× alphagold
This result is confirmed by our data, which shows that both the proportion of grasses and SOC tend to increase in more intensive systems compared to less intensive systems, although the relationship is relatively weak (r = 0.280) and only marginally significant ( p = 0.066).
a marginal trendp = 0.0731.5× alphagold
Consistent with this interpretation, tests of multivariate dispersion did not detect significant heterogeneity among ENSO groups for Aitchison distances (betadisper, p = 0.191) or Jensen–Shannon distances ( p = 0.101), whereas Bray–Curtis showed only a marginal trend ( p = 0.073).
slightly significantp = 0.0821.6× alphaqualifiedgold
Indeed, Glutacetine ® decreased spike number per square meter and increased grain number per spike in all situations except under UAN nutrition at site 3 ( Figure 1 B and C), leading to a higher grain number per square meter (except under urea fertilizer at site 3), which was slightly significant under UAN nutrition at site 2 ( p = 0.082, +9.4%, Figure 1 D).
marginally significantp = 0.091.8× alphagold
There was marginally significant exponential decay relationships between increases in root length in the topsoil at the grain filling stage due to e[CO 2 ] and responses in grain yield ( p = 0.09) and HI ( p = 0.08), suggesting a trade-off in carbon (C) allocation between roots and above-ground biomass.