Excerpts

43, β = 0.32), all highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The microarray finding could be confirmed, and a statistically highly significant down regulation of PRKCDBP was found among the BCBM samples compared to the primary BC (p = 0.001) ( Figure 2 ).

When applying these intensity distributions from the “training sample” (N = 1282) to the “holdout sample” (N = 641), occupational and total PAEE displayed an increasing trend across occupational groups ( Figure 2 ), with the highest values in heavy manual workers (p<0.001).

For English musicians and non-musicians, the results revealed significant or marginally significant main effects of the following variables: vowel quality [χ 2 (1) = 43.46, p < 0.001], duration [χ 2 (1) = 6341.9, p < 0.001] and pitch direction [χ 2 (1) = 3.52, p = 0.06].

In girls the difference was highly significant (18.3% of the 11 yo, vs. 25.5% of the 15 yo; p<0.001 among age groups).

Within the rhizosphere, ploidy was also a highly significant factor in explaining alpha diversity variation (F = 23.6, p-value<0.001) (S3 Table in S1 File ).

However, mice immunised with both rPA and alum and transfused with the DC vaccine had 100% survival and a highly significant reduction in bacterial load within 2 days of challenge, compared to the negative controls (p<0.001) and to the rPA and alum group (p<0.05).

However, the indices are not as good as those of the model in which item ATI4 was removed [�2 (33, N = 359) = 181, p < 0.001, CFI = 0.96, SRMR = 0.04] and the chi-squared difference is highly significant [��2 (9 = N = 359) = 51, p <.001].

A highly significant main effect of Stimulus Type was also observed ( F (1,67) = 288.092, p < .001, η p 2 = .81), with a higher mean frequency of switches in the feature condition ( M = 7.53, SEM = .26, 95% CI [7.00, 8.05]) compared to the conjunction condition ( M = 2.29, SEM = .25, 95% CI [1.79, 2.79]).

The p overall and p trend for the RS mutations were both highly significant (p<0.001) demonstrating a clear mutagenic effect, with the exception of the lowest dose tested (0.25 Gy) where no RS mutations were observed.

>70% variation explained in 5/6 analyses, Figure 1a ; Figure 2a–c ; Figure 3a–c ), and highly significant linear relationships (p<0.001; Table 2 ).

Factors associated with low-dose ARNI The average ARNI dose demonstrated a decreasing trend associated with lower average on-treatment SBP (r = 0.253, p < 0.001); patients with lower SBP received lower ARNI doses ( S1 Fig ).

In addition, examination of prostate cell lines showed a highly significant difference in PIM1 expression between the tERG positive and negative cell lines (p<0.001) ( Fig. 2B ).

When entered, the resulting model was highly significant ( r 2 = 0.29, F 1,39 = 16.13, p <0.001) and SIPS disorganization was a significant predictor ( β = −0.54, t = −4.02, p <0.001; see Figure 2 ), indicating that a higher score on disorganization symptoms at baseline was predictive of a poorer functional outcome.

This difference was highly significant ( t = 12.97, p < .001, d = 1.64).

In addition, the quadratic term was highly significant, F (1, 13) = 69.4, p<.001.

LMM analysis revealed a highly significant decrease in negative mood immediately following SKT1 practice ( b = 0.572, t (522.79) = 42.12, p < .001), representing a large effect size (Paired Cohen’s d = 1.00, 95% CI [0.91, 1.09]).

All values were considered significant at P <0.05, and highly significant at P <0.001.

However, while we did find a significant correlation between WASI II scores and age in Study 1 (r = .28, p = .035) our LoL data showed no correlation between expertise and age and a partial correlation of expertise with WASI II accounting for age was still highly significant ( p = .001, r = .45).

Herbarium study: chronic OA response Herbarium-derived calcification values (n = 79) showed a decreasing trend in the calcified surface of P. pavonica thalli over time ( Figure 4A ; P<0.001, power = 1.000).

For the total number of request strategies used in a single dialogue, the overall between-group difference was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001, eta2 = 0.2598, large effect).

Highly significant differences ( P <0.001) were found between gender and groups, but not for the interaction effect (gender × group; P >0.05) ( Table 1 ).

MRT x trial interaction was extremely significant (P<0.001).

Furthermore, a highly significant (P < 0.001) over-expression of AGR3 protein in G1 and G2 breast tumours compared to normal breast tissues ( Fig. 2G ) was detectable as well.

Highly significant correlations were found between the three SGI chronologies ( p < 0.001; 0.55 < τ < 0.68) of all specimens.