Excerpts

The Bartlett’s test of Sphericity is highly significant at p < 0.001 which shows that the correlation matrix has significant correlations among at least some of the variables.

When both individualistic and communal phrases are included in a regression equation predicting year, only individualistic phrases are significant, though communal phrases showed a marginal trend (Beta = .71, p <.001; for communal phrases, Beta = .23, p = .06).

The effect of MDMA on positive mood was highly significant (p<.001) in the GLM model including pindolol, and almost reached significance (p = 0.057) in the GLM model including ketanserin.

The difference was highly significant ( P <0.001) between the age- and gender-matched stroke subgroup and the control group.

In this work we found a highly significant reduction in SOST levels overtime (p-value = 0.001) ( Figure 2C , Table 2 ).

Significant PVs included Depth, SST and X,Y ( Table 4 ), and the parametric variable Swell was also highly significant (p <0.001).

This result was confirmed by the ML-HKA test [25] , for which a model allowing selection for PDS showed highly significant improvement to the likelihood compared with the neutral model (χ 2 = 19.62, df = 1, P <0.001).

However, we observed a highly significant difference in the duration of the experiment after controlling for age (ANCOVA: F(2,89) = 9.489, p < .001, mean 2-AFC = 206.20 sec, mean 4-AFC = 135.37 sec, Fig 8 ), indicating completing 30 trials in a 4-AFC task takes considerably less time than completing 60 trials in a 2-AFC task even though the average trial duration in the 4-AFC was significantly longer than in the 2-AFC experiment (mean 2-AFC = 3.44 sec, mean 4-AFC = 4.51 sec, ANCOVA: F(2,89) = 4.682, p = .01).

In our aforementioned study, the systematic inaccuracies revealed highly significant (F tests, p<0.001 for 6 out of 10 subjects).

Though not an objective of the study, a positive result was that ES remained a highly significant predictor in all adjusted models developed (p < .001); this had not yet been demonstrated in the previous study by Gallardo-Estrella et al.

As shown in Fig 2 , we observed a highly significant inverse association of the T/S ratio (as surrogate of TL) and chronological age (r = -0.345, P<0.001).

Finally, there was a highly significant difference in predation between the two sites ( site 1a and site 1b ) (gall predation: negative binomial GLMM, estimate = −2.05, SE = 0.44, z = −4.64, p<0.001; the incidence of gall predation: binomial GLMM, estimate = −2.25, SE = 0.31, z = −7.26, p<0.001; predation rate: quasibinomial GLMM, estimate = −2.13, SE = 0.26, df = 521, t = −8.30, p<0.001).

A permutation test showed that the differences in the metabolic profiles between high and low VO 2max -subjects were highly significant (p<0.001).

The effect of glycerol supplementation was highly significant (p < .001).

The increase of U was observed in all cases and was highly significant ( P = 0.001, paired t-test).

The chemical-genetic interaction of the positive control methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), a well-characterized antifungal agent that damages DNA [ 28 ], demonstrated a highly significant enrichment ( P value ≤ 0.001) for cellular response to DNA damage stimulus, confirming a successful HIP-HOP assay procedure and accurate post-sequencing data analysis.

Notably, nine studies demonstrated a highly significant effect (p<0.001) in reducing burnout at various stages.

We also carried out a mixed-effects model with village as a random factor, and the relationship remained highly significant at p < 0.001.

Highly significant regression patterns were recorded for total parasitoid or specialist parasitoid species richness and parasitism rate were observed (F 1,44 = 15.304, p<0.001; F 1,44 = 17.143, p<0.001).

As expected, there was a highly significant correlation between the sample size of cichlid individuals ( Table 1 ) and “Sum” ( Table 5 ) (Spearman's ρ = 0.972, P <0.001).

All these differences were highly significant (p < 0.001).

An increasing trend of posterior lamellar techniques over the total of keratoplasties was found (p<0.001).

The results showed that the difference is extremely significant (F = 5.925, p<0.001) (see Table 2 ).

Indeed, while highly significant for Filipinos (p<0.001), we detected only a moderate association of rs2237892 (KCNQ1) with GDM in Japanese subjects (p = 0.03) and none in Pacific Islanders (p = 0.49) ( Table 3 ).

Using an independent samples t -test, mean differences between groups were highly significant for all vascular disease risk variables ( p- values<0.001).