Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The strength of inter- and intralimb coordination estimated with the length of vector r was highly significant ( p < 0.001) in all groups and attained values of 0.95–0.98 in intact rats, while saline and Riluzole treated rats showed ranges of 0.84–0.98 and 0.79–0.97, respectively.
highly significantp<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Influence of HIV status on plasma levels of sCD14, sCD163 and CXCL10 Comparing normalised (log-transformed) levels of plasma biomarkers in the HIV-infected and healthy control groups (ANOVA with Bonferroni correction as appropriate for multiple comparisons), we found a highly significant difference in plasma sCD14 levels in the HIV + group compared to controls ( Fig. 4A ; p<0.001), with no detectable influence of HIV suppression on sCD14 levels compared with the viremic HIV group (p>0.9).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This decreasing number of cells for all B cell subsets was most likely due to the progressive reduction of circulating total lymphocyte numbers (data not shown) in combination with a reduced frequency of CD20 + cells in PBMC ( P < 0.001) ( Fig 5A ), resulting in a highly significant and progressive reduction of total CD20 + cell counts ( P < 0.001) ( Fig 5B ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In detail, a highly significant decrease of collagen IV- and Iba-staining was found at the ischemic border zone with respect to the ischemic core (p < 0.001 for both markers; Wilcoxon test), while the signals were further reduced in the contralateral striatum (p < 0.001 for both markers; Wilcoxon test).
highly significantp <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A repeated measures ANOVA including the within-subject factors RESPONSE (errors versus correct hits) and CONDITION (placebo versus control), carried out on the ERN amplitudes averaged across the three frontocentral electrodes (Fz, FCz, and Cz), revealed a highly significant main effect of RESPONSE ( F (1,17) = 25.0, p <0.001), showing, as expected, a larger ERN for errors relative to fast hits.
highly significantp<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Highly significant two-way interaction effects between the length of the masking interval and the ball acceleration accounted for this response pattern (TE: F (4, 40) = 30.7, p<0.001 for Experiment 1 and F (4, 40) = 18.8, p<0.001 for Experiment 2; PE: F (4, 40) = 20.8, p<0.001 for Experiment 1 and F (4, 40) = 28.1, p<0.001 for Experiment 2).