Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantP<0.00070.0× alphaqualifiedgold
After accounting for the effect of network size on N (type-2 regression: N = 0.59+0.077*logSize, F 1,57 = 9.98, P<0.0025), differences between network types were highly significant (F 2,56 = 8.21, P<0.0007) and pair-wise comparisons discriminated comensalistic networks from antagonistic and mutualistic ones (Scheffé-test: P<0.0009 and P<0.029, respectively), which differed marginally between themselves (P>0.052).
highly significantP<0.00070.0× alphaqualifiedgold
When applying the CV mortality results in univariate Cox regressions, we observed a highly significant risk reduction resulting from supplementing the participants with selenium and coenzyme Q10 for four years, also after 12 years (HR:0.58; 95%CI: 0.42–0.79; P<0.0007).
highly significantp = 0.00080.0× alphaqualifiedgold
While rs2555639 was the only SNP that was significantly associated with risk of colon cancer in each of the discovery and validation sets independently, several additional SNPs had highly significant association with risk when combining data from the discovery and validation samples ( Table 5 ), including rs1365611 (OR = 1.73, 95%CI:1.26–2.37, p = 0.0008), rs6844282 (OR = 1.42, 95%CI:1.10–1.83, p = 0.0078), and rs2332897 (OR = 1.74, 95%CI:1.27–2.38, p = 0.0006).
highly significantp = 8×10 −40.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Another clone (5B3, from pool F, Mm8 Chr16: 91155139–91157882), containing an insert located 57 kb downstream of 5A5, similarly induced expression in the trigeminal ganglion ( Figure 2 ), although in this case the penetrance of the phenotype was lower (41%, n = 22), albeit highly significant (p = 8×10 −4 ).
Indeed, with the D 2 O method, milk production was 34% lower in LP dams, compared with control dams (P = 0.016) whereas the difference failed to reach statistical significance with the WSW method, except at PND 14 (P = 0.0008) during the peak of lactation.
nominally significantP = 8.32×10 −40.0× alphagold
In single-SNP analyses, two of the 13 SNPs showed nominally significant associations with wet AMD (rs2241394, nominal P = 8.32×10 −4 ; rs428453, nominal P = 0.0240), of which only rs2241394 withstood multiple test corrections (corrected empirical P = 0.0102; Bonferroni-corrected P = 0.0108, Table 2 ).
highly significantp = 0.00090.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Spearman non-parametric analysis found highly significant positive correlations with several analytes, including IFN-γ ( r = 0.57, p = 0.0009), GATA-3 ( r = 0.51, p = 0.004), CTLA-4 ( r = 0.48; p = 0.006), FOXP3 ( r = 0.37, p = 0.04), and an inverse correlation with CCL2 ( r = −0.62, p = 0.0003) (data not shown).