Excerpts

Our best explanation is that this result may be due simply to the small sample size (N = 10), although even with this small sample, finding that only 3 (30%) colonies that scored as Africanized rather than the expected 60.85%, as found in our large sample of San Diego County foraging workers is marginally significant ( χ 2 = 3.995, P = 0.046).

veronii ( P value = 0.000078) while difference was slightly significant between A. hydrophila and A. veronii ( P value = 0.046).

If the UC and CD subgroups were compared separately to the published normative data, the effects were of a similar size but were only marginally significant because of the smaller sample size (p = 0.046 for UC; p = 0.01 for CD).

The interaction term between T2D and depression was only marginally significant in analyses of both IQ changes (p = 0.046) and significant decline in IQ (p = 0.044).

A significant increase in the relative proportion of trisomic cells having at least one micronucleus was observed at timepoint 2 compared to timepoint 1 (P = 0.0186), with a marginally significant value being noted for the disomic cells (P = 0.0464) ( Table 3 ).

In linear regression models, the interaction term (daily dosage in 10-mg increments x long-acting opioid) was statistically significant in models for BPI-I (p<0.0001) and VR-12 physical (p = 0.0029), and marginally significant for VR-12 mental (p = 0.0466).

Using this assay, we could show that compounds FMP-503533, FMP-214534, FMP-401319 and to a slightly lesser extend FMP-214219 significantly inhibited translocation and processing of CRF 1 R-pPL (p < 0.0001) whereas compound FMP-208236 only had a minor effect on translocation inhibition, although with borderline significance (18% reduced translocation; p = 0.0467) ( Fig 5A , the red arrow indicates the SPcNC fragment, i.e. the translocated CRF 1 R-pPL without signal peptide).

In addition to the three new compounds, significant (marginally significant in the CDS double knockdown lines) increases in compounds eluted at 7.83 min (peak 4) (19.7 ± 7.9 AU for the vector transformed controls; 14.3 ± 8.8 AU, p = 0.0468 for the CDS double knockdown lines; 13.2 ± 9.9 AU, p = 0.0053 for the 3’ UTR double knockdown lines) and 11.03 min (peak 6) (20.6 ± 6.8 AU for the vector transformed controls; 16.2 ± 8.6 AU, p = 0.0743 for the CDS double knockdown lines; 13.2 ± 7.6 AU, p = 0.0007 for the 3’ UTR double knockdown lines) were found in the double knockdown lines ( Fig 6B ).

The previously identified GWAS HV SNP (rs6581612) and the candidate BDNF SNP (rs6265) were nominally significant ( p = 0.047 and p = 0.041 respectively).

The only exception was Casjensviridae , which was just barely below m for SparCEV (Estimate: 0.57, m = 0.59), but just barely significant for CLR ( p = 0.047 after correction for multiple testing).

Similarly, plasma Aβ1-42 levels demonstrated no change in patients with mild-to-moderate autism as compared to controls but a nearly significant decrease (∼50%) in severely autistic patients as compared to controls following ANOVA (F = 3.340, p = 0.047) and post-hoc Dunnett's multiple comparison test (p = 0.055) ( Figure 3B ).

Three-way repeated measures ANOVA of Valence by Arousal by Hemisphere on P2b latencies ( Table 3 ) revealed a marginally significant main effect of Arousal ( F (1, 20) = 4.50, p = .047, η 2 p = .18), and a three-way interaction of Valence, Arousal, and Hemisphere ( F (1, 20) = 4.45, p = .048, η 2 p = .18), such that the latencies for high arousing negative pictures were shorter than those for low arousing negative pictures over the left hemisphere.

The difference in fall occurrence by time of day was marginally significant (χ2 = 21.247, p = .047).

Gene essentiality shows a similar trend but the difference is only marginally significant (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.047, data not shown).

Results When comparing if measures of cortical thickness differed depending on acquisition site, a borderline significant difference was found for right mOFC thickness values (t = -2.090, p = 0.047).

Metric invariance was established as the model fitness is marginally non-significant (p = .047) when the factor loadings were constrained to be the same across gender.

In contrast, the corresponding values for LV EDV for 4D-MSPECT were comparable, and LV ESV was underestimated with borderline significance compared with cardiac MRI ( P = 0.047).

A considerable difference was apparent with average levels of IL-6, 4-fold (p = 0.047), and TNF-α, 5-fold (p = 0.0025), higher in fibroblasts from minipig #175-5 AP relative to the control.

A significant trend was observed for age, with younger women being more likely to have severe tokophobia (p = 0.047).

Exploratory paired t-tests also revealed marginally significant reductions in negative affect [ t( 34) = 2.06, p = .047, d = 0.35] and boredom [ t( 34) = 2.24, p = .032, d = 0.38] from baseline to intervention.

At baseline, there was a marginally significant difference in one-way ANOVA regarding attitudes towards eMHSs for stress coping, with a small ES ( F (3,447) = 2.67, p = 0.047, ŋ p 2 = .02; d = 0.29).

For aortic regurgitation measurements, jet area was marginally significant at baseline (p = 0.047) but lost significance at the 6-month exam.

The interaction between group body parts was significant with CT attenuation and CNR (p = 0.002 and 0.003 respectively), and marginally significant with SNR (p = 0.047), with minimal changes noticed between the two groups.

4A 1 ), and OP4 (p<0.001) (data shown only for the OP3 component), though OP2 showed a marginally significant interaction effect (p = 0.047).

In multivariable-adjusted analyses ( table 3 ), VIM was not associated with the risk of any endpoint (p≥0.058), except for a borderline significant but inverse association with the risk of cardiac endpoints in a model not including SBP (p = 0.047).