Excerpts

If the same association was 1.) supported by three different tests, 2.) was highly significant for at least one of them ( p ≤ 0.01), and 3.) was shared by the females and males of the same species or even by different species, then we deemed the outcome as reliable and reported it in detail.

The difference in the thicknesses of the small airway wall was markedly significant between the controls (7.6±1.1 μm 2 /μm) and the WS group (14.3±3.3 μm 2 /μm, p<0.01) or the CS group (12.1±3.4 μm 2 /μm, p<0.01) ( Figure 2h ).

KEGG analysis of DAPs We also conducted KEGG analysis to further explore the molecular functions of DAPs identified in this study, the highly significant enriched DAPs ( P < 0.01) were in four pathways: ‘Ribosome’, ‘Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis’, ‘Glutathione metabolism’, ‘Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis’ and ‘Flavonoid biosynthesis’ ( Fig 3 ).

Statistical analysis showed a highly significant difference in serum CCSA-2 concentration between the colorectal cancer patients and each of the other individual group( F = 265.37, P <0.01. figure 1 ), but there was no difference between other couple groups ( P >0.05, figure 1 ).

Even though the association of our main independent variable to completion of the primary endpoint is highly significant (p<0.01), the wide OR confidence interval precludes accurate specification of the strength of the relationship.

[19] revealed a highly significant enrichment (p<0.01) of E2F target genes in the downregulated fraction ( Figure 3 D ; Table 1 ).

This is in line with a preliminary report of 11 DBN patients which showed a trend (uncorrected data p<0.01) for vermal atrophy (lobules V,VI) [ 42 ].

Significant differences (0.01 < p < 0.05) were marked with single asterisk (*), and extremely significant differences (p < 0.01) were marked with double asterisks (**).

In the deceased group, the covariation pairs between M184V and L74I were highly significant (p < 0.01, OR > 1).

The number of codivergence events was highly significant (P<0.01, the null hypothesis being the two phylogenies are randomly related) for scenarios with 0, 1 or 2 gene transfers, giving a good indication that AVR k1 and TE1a sequences have coevolved.

Finally the GC and GC 12 were also compared with GC 3 and a highly significant positive correlations ( r = 0.28, P< 0.01; GC 12 versus GC 3 ) ( r = 0.85, P< 0.01; GC versus GC 3 ) was observed as shown in Figure 6A and 6B respectively.

The phase average wavelength and MoCA scores were negatively correlated in 13 brain regions (81.3% of the total, P < 0.05), and 10 of them were highly significant ( P < 0.01), indicating that the lower the cognitive score, the longer the wavelength.

The plot of the aiming error at 300 ms after movement onset ( Figure 4 ) gives a similar picture to the one offered by the lateral deviation ( Figure 3.a ); no significant differences among the groups (F(2,15) = 0.208; p = 0.814) were observed and highly significant differences between the target sets (F(5,75) = 231.84; p<0.01).

The paired-sample t -test showed that NH 4 NO 3 and watering frequency had highly significant effects ( P <0.01), whereas the degree of shading had a lower, although significant, effect on crust biomass development ( P <0.05).

Comparisons were deemed significant when p <0.05 and highly significant when p <0.01.

Brucellosis herd transmission risk score Univariable ordinal analyses showed highly significant associations between the brucellosis herd transmission risk score with District and ‘Heard about human brucellosis’ (both P < 0.01).

These three effects, taken together, indicated that the FCz, Cz, and CPz sites, compared to the other recording sites, had significantly more pronounced P200 waves (all post-hoc pairwise t tests were highly significant after Bonferroni correction, p<.01).

Our model demonstrate that the preservation of the biocultural fund- represented here as Biocultural Savings [S]- is a positive and highly significant predictor of social well-being ( β = 0.685, p < 0.01), alongside a positive impact from the indigenous population index ( β = 0.015, p < 0.1), suggesting that cultural identity plays a foundational role in regional resilience.

Heterogeneity was not present for RCTs (Q = 3.48, df = 2, p = 0.18; I2 = 42%), but highly significant for non-RCTs (Q = 12.41, df = 4, p = 0.01; I2 = 68%).

Among them, the NDVI and T max showed an extremely significant positive correlation in spring and winter ( p < 0.01), a significant positive correlation in autumn ( p < 0.05), and no correlation in summer ( p > 0.05).

Most of these pair-wise comparisons continued to show an increase in similarity over time (e.g., 12 out of 15 for small mammals, 14 out of 15 for high visibility), and all p-values were highly significant (small: p = 0.0103; medium: p<0.0001; large: p = 0.0006; low visibility: p<0.0001; medium visibility: p = 0.0002; high visibility: p = 0.0006), indicating that variable sampling effort among different body sizes or visibility classes of mammals does not significantly influence our results.

Interestingly, the aforementioned 41 candidate genes identified by us had an overlap of 4 genes with the 438 genes, and the overlap was quite significant (p-value = 0.01057, Fisher's exact test).

The SNP was nominally significant in the discovery meta-analysis ( p = 0.011; Table S11 ); however, most studies reported a positive effect of the C allele– opposite to that reported by Nicolaou et al.

Younger participants showed a trend-level preference for pictures in the ‘Space’ ( F (1,183) = 6.7, p = 0.011) category. ‘Liking’ ratings for ‘HAI’ and ‘HTD’ categories A repeated measures ANCOVA yielded a significant main effect of category ( F (1,183) = 7.4, p = 0.007) and interactions between category and age ( F (1,183) = 12.5, p = 0.001), category and diagnosis ( F (1,183) = 15.2, p < 0.001), and category and gender ( F (1,183) = 19.4, p < 0.001; Figs 2B , 3B and 4B ).

Anxiety (DASS), which exhibited a trend toward significance in the full model, became a significant predictor within the clinical group (b = −1.06, t (51) = −2.649, p = .011).