Student's t-test indicates that the difference between the slopes of the curves that describe these relationships is highly significant (t = 3.55, p = 0.01).
Excerpts
However, if interaction terms are included in the regression equations, the associations for ( b1 ), ( b3 ), ( b4 ), and ( c6666 ) each become nominally significant ( p = 0 . 01–0 . 05 ).
This indicated that all observed P sex values for each MLG expansion were highly significant at the p <0.01 threshold, suggesting that all of the samples are clonal.
The number of codivergence events was highly significant (P<0.01, the null hypothesis being the two phylogenies are randomly related) for scenarios with 0, 1 or 2 gene transfers, giving a good indication that AVR k1 and TE1a sequences have coevolved.
Pearson’s correlation matrix for all soil sample counts (n = 27) shows significant (p < 0.05) and extremely significant (p < 0.01) associations between heavy metals.
Only one category showed an increasing trend, kayaks spread out with whales (R 2 = 0.45, p = 0.01).
Although we found marginal significance between two SNPs, rs7013278 and rs7014346 (HR = 2.20, P = 0.01 and HR = 1.96, P = 0.03 respectively), with inferior CRC survival by multivariate regression analysis, none of these variants showed study-wide association with survival after correction for multiple testing.
Table 2 , which reports results of the X 2 -test of statistical significance of differences in the observed FoS values, shows that the observed differences are highly significant ( X 2 = 310.08; p<0.01). 3.2 Regression models Tables 3 – 5 present the estimated models.
Since the interaction effect of population and extraction method was highly significant ( p -value < 0.01) for all four response variables ( Table 11 ), multiple means comparison was done to compare the nine combinations of population and extraction method using the lsmeans statement at the 5% level of significance ( Table 12 ).
Differences were considered significant for p<0.05 and highly significant for p<0.01.
Significant or highly significant differences were respectively considered as 0.05>P>0.01 or P<0.01.
The proportion of time spent in MVPA (expressed as an individual isometric log-ratio co-ordinate) had a highly significant association ( P <0.01) with UACR.
In conclusion, the anthropometric results showed highly significant differences in joint mobility in all dimensions in the elderly group compared to the adult group (p < 0.01).
The results of the analysis of variance indicated that the effects of genotypes (G) and environments (E) were highly significant in the BC 1 population ( P < 0.01); however, the interaction between G and E (G × E) did not significantly affect the SL, SW, and L/W across the three environments ( S3 Table ).
Differences were regarded as significant if p≤0.05 and highly significant if p≤0.01.
Model 2 was overall highly significant ( Fig 2C ; p < 0.01) with an accuracy of 76.7% ( Fig 2B ).
Table 3 presents evidence that non-subsidized firms had a significantly higher exit rate (3.73%) compared to subsidized firms (2.41%), resulting in a mean difference of −1.38%, with a highly significant t-statistic of −7.05 (p < 0.01).
The difference in performance for the two modalities was moderately significant ( t (118) = -2.61, p = .01, BF = 4.03), with a higher performance in the haptic domain.
All these associations are highly significant at P<0.01.
Through analysis of variance, it was found that the effect of planting mode on soil carbon nitrogen ratio reached a highly significant level ( P < 0.01), and the effect of soil depth reached a significant level ( P < 0.05).
The experimental model was highly significant (P < 0.01).
Table S1 presents an overview of the most nominally significant SNPs ( p <0.01) in the regions that have been reported for CAD.
Output was limited to a maximum of 200 terms, and highly significant (p < 0.01) terms were retained.
3.2.1 Plant height Pepper height showed a highly significant (P<0.01) among the different irrigation levels was presented in ( Fig 5 ) below.
26 genes mapping to the 1q arm show highly significant (P≤0.01) overexpression of transcripts in breast cancer compared to normal breast tissue.