Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp = 0,00780.2× alphaqualifiedgold
In summary, all spines that displayed significant morphological changes upon TEA treatment ( Fig 2A ) also displayed a highly significant increase in dynamics of the short as well as the long actin filaments, τ 1 and τ 2 ( Fig 2C and 2D , p = 0,0078 and 0,0008, respectively), and an increase in the calculated number of long filament, N 2 ( Fig 2F , p = 0,0014).
only marginally significantp = 0.0080.2× alphagold
The only marginally significant temporal trend observed was a decrease ( p = 0.008) in POM-C concentrations that occurred between spring and fall during the maize phase of the 3YR rotation, where POM-C fell from a spring high of 2.79 g cm -3 to a fall value of 1.48 g cm -3 ( Fig 1A ).
highly significantP = 0.00800.2× alphaqualifiedgold
11 ) samples showed highly significant ( F = 7.64; P = 0.0080; species-environment relation variance explained by axis 1∶75.9%; and cumulatively by axis 1 and 2∶97.7%) clusters of species associated with fruit and coffee plantations (lower right quadrant), an intermediate group associated, to some extent, with most habitats examined (clustered in upper left and right quadrants), albeit most strongly associated with endemic- and introduced forest habitats, and a third cluster associated primarily with endemic forest.
highly significantp = 0.0080.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Only 3 out of the 46 outcome measures in common in the two studies showed significant differences and only one was highly significant: In PPMS there was greater progression in the EDSS sensory system by either definition 1 (p = 0.008) or definition 2 (p = 0.04) and in SPMS there was greater progression in the 9HP but only using definition 2 (p = 0.04, Table 3 ).
highly significantP = 0.0080.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Interestingly however, we have found highly significant correlations between CCL20 signal intensities and three clinical parameters: 1) Vital status of patients (Alive – 535+/−58 vs. dead – 786 +/− 72, P = 0.008), 2) Tumor differentiation (Well differentiated – 334+/−83 vs. poorly differentiated – 793 +/− 88, P = 0.004) and 3) T score of TNM staging system (T-1 – 552+/−68 vs.