Excerpts

Conversely in RA this percentage was higher in males than in females in both studies but the difference was highly significant here (p<0.005) but less so in Meyer and colleagues (p = 0.043).

The correlation between genetic similarity and the taxonomic distance was found highly significant ( r = −0. 50 ; P = 0.005).

Data Analysis Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare the rates of mutation for each gene between the two genders with a p-value of <0.05 considered indicative of a positive trend and a p-value of <0.005 considered statistically significantly due to Bonferroni correction.

A two-by two chi-sq test [(30, 19), (46, 95)] showed this difference to be highly significant (P<0.005; Figure 5 ).

All significant differences (p<0.05) are marked with an asterisk (*) and highly significant differences (p<0.005) are marked with two asterisks (**).

Since the mechanical studies in STAT3-OKO-M mice all yielded highly significant effects (p<0.005), while the studies in STAT3-OKO-BL, despite similar effect sizes, did not achieve the 0.025 threshold, we sought to further confirm our prediction of defects in intrinsic parameters consistent with altered bone quality by determining whether meta-analysis of the combined studies yielded significant effects.

In a general linear model of body condition index as a function of Julian day, breeding state, and an interaction term, all three terms were highly significant (p<0.005).

PRLR −/− mice exhibited a basal body weight lower than those of wild type mice [15] , but PEG-SMLA treatment induced a similar highly significant ( p< 0.005) increased mass change in the WT and PRLR −/− treated mice ( Figure 1A ), which was quantified in Figure 1B .

Furthermore, there was a strong and highly significant correlation between scores from both raters (P = 0.005, Spearman's coefficient 0.75).

However, using more up-to-date data on species’ mean group sizes from [ 68 ], there is in fact a highly significant positive overall correlation ( Fig 7 : r = 0.612, p = 0.005 2-tailed).

However, when compared to DMSO, the inhibitions by P2, P6, P7 and P8 were highly significant ( p <0.005).

Trainees showed a negative correlation between objectivism and regret (r = -0.309; p = 0.003), however faculty did not (r = 0.120; p = 1.00); the difference between these two correlations was highly significant (p = 0.005).

Glass slides inoculated with MRSA strain M1 and treated with singular phage showed highly significant reductions in CFUs (p ≤ 0.005) compared to mock treatments ( Fig 2B ).

While similar numbers of the mutant from low dose challenge were present in the lungs at day 2 PI, recovery dropped off to significantly fewer numbers by day 4 PI ( P <0.05), and to a highly significant difference by day 7 PI ( P <0.005) ( Fig. 10A ).

Only highly significant gene-sets (p < 0.005; FDR < 1%) are shown as nodes in the enrichment map.

At these thresholds, the Kaplan-Meier analyses based on PFS ( Figure 4a ) and OS ( Figure 4b ) both show highly significant differences between patients scoring below the threshold and those scoring at or above it: PFS analysis p <0.005, OS analysis p = 0.002.

By contrast, the effect of the [obtained outcome x group] interaction showed a strong trend after Bonferroni correction towards negative outcomes (β = 0.04, p<0.005), confirming that RRMS patients rated negative outcomes less negatively than the controls.

Cellular immune responses induced by the different vaccination regimens: (a) Short interval BCG-MVA85A When subjects who had been vaccinated 4 weeks previously with BCG were vaccinated with MVA85A, a highly significant rise in antigen specific T cells was seen, 1 week after MVA85A vaccination (PPD, antigen 85 and summed peptide pools, p = 0.005).

Corresponding Mann-Whitney U tests were highly significant (all p < 0.005), and these associations withstood adjustment for multiple testing.

Consistent with the ELISA results, the relative staining intensity of VEGF decreased by 69% from the baseline (252.8 ± 25.9 to 77.3 ± 7.3) on day 1 after VILI, although this difference did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.005 and adjusted p = 0.075, Fig 4C ).

In each case, the difference between likelihoods of topologies was highly significant (p<0.005), indicating that there was no support for a tree in which dealbatus is monophyletic and sister to a monophyletic clade of alexandrinus samples.

Using band densitometry to compare relative expression levels, we found that, on average, signature envelope expression was 2.5-fold higher than non-signature envelope expression; the difference in signal intensity between the two groups was highly significant (p<.005).

These covariates were all highly significant (p<0.005), and accounted for 38.9% of variability in log e mean CIMT.

The cerebellum showed a trend (p<0.005 uncorrected) ( Table 4 ).

Similarly, Model 2 shows the interaction between the PSA score and general intuitiveness; there is a highly significant and positive interaction effect ( β = 5.740, p = .005).