Regression analysis showed that the predictive model provided a good fit to the data with a highly significant F value ( F (4,138) = 88.6, p <.001), and that the four predictors explained 71.2% of the variation in neurodevelopmental outcomes (adjusted R 2 = 0.712).
Excerpts
Standardized path coefficients for TDP and DOC regarding their effects on BA were positive and significant or marginally significant (TDP: 0.625, p-value<0.001; DOC: 0.460, p-value<0.05).
Statistical analysis indicated that the difference in apoptosis of monocytes between patients with active TB and healthy controls was highly significant (p<0.001) ( Fig. 1B ).
AR status was independent of ER-or PR expression status, and AA tumor had highly significant differences in AR status compared to White patients (p<0.001), ( S3 Fig ).
Timepoint, location, and the timepoint x location interaction were highly significant in accounting for differences in gene co-occurrence patterns (PERMANOVA, P<0.001 for all), although timepoint explained the most variation (timepoint R2 = 0.40, location R2 = 0.07, timepoint x location R2 = 0.04).
There was a highly significant correlation between the right and left baPWV (r = 0.944, p<0.001).
At this time, the mean and standard deviation of the percentage of nuclei in the six fields showing condensation and/or nuclear fragmentation was 8.8±1.9 in the controls and 35.6±5.8 in the infected cells, and this difference was highly significant ( P <0.001).
While, the levels of sorbitol were decreased with curcumin, the reduction was highly significant (p<0.001) with nanocurcumin ( Table 2 ).
Settings for both observers revealed a highly significant main effect of the adapt condition on the image appearance (S1 F(2,45)=29.5, p<.001; S2 F(2,45)=58.3, p<.001).
The first canonical variate accounted for 48.5% of the variance between the horizontal and vertical factors and was highly significant (Wilks’ Lambda 0.506, approximated by F(4,92)=9.34, p<.001).
The analysis yields a highly significant advantage for the revised template when combined with real text (F[1,120] = 14.22, p < .001 eta 2 = .101), as well as a modest advantage in the bogus text condition (one-sided test; F[1,120] = 2.99, p < .05, eta 2 = .023).
However, both the RNFL and the GCL/IPL demonstrated a highly significant negative correlation with the INL (r= -0.61, p<0.001 and r= -0.44, p=0.007 respectively).
Comparing pyramidal-like CA1 and CA3 ESN morphology to type B ESNs (live after 28 DIV), revealed highly significant differences between the two groups ( Fig. 1D ; p<0.001).
Both variables under study, days post-injection and treatment with the different inhibitors, as well as the interaction between the two variables produced a highly significant (P<0.001) effect on tumor growth.
The Target TTP had a highly significant effect on the descending slope, F (1, 21) = 25.7, p <.001, with a more negative slope for the short TTP (−0.00457±0.0003 μV/[cm 2 ·ms]) than for the long TTP (−0.00252±0.0002 μV/[cm 2 ·ms]).
Repeatability of AOC measures was tested on 62 samples that were assayed in duplicate, and was found to be large and highly significant (R = 0.65, z = 4.29, P<0.001).
To verify that the differences between the four FSE criticality indices were substantively meaningful and not artefacts of small numerical variation, a Friedman test was conducted, yielding a highly significant result (χ2 (3) = 72.255, p < 0.001), confirming that respondents rated the four critical role constructs significantly differently overall as shown in Table 6 .
The mean difference in z-scores between the groups was highly significant (p<0.001) for all three indicators.
The seven-year PV of Clostridium butyricum , Bacillus mesentericus , and Enterococcus faecalis was 10.9% with a decreasing trend (Z = -4.40, p < 0.001).
Using the secreted luciferase assay, with the data normalised to the 1 hour time point, we observed a highly significant ( P ≤ 0.001) effect of the SINE insertion on the production of luciferase (hence myostatin) in undifferentiated cells ( Fig 3A ).
Consistently, there was an extremely significant increase in HbA1c% on comparing both T2DM+ATHR and T2DM-ATHR diabetic groups to the control group (P<0.001 and P<0.01 respectively).
Both correlations were highly significant (p < 0.001).
These results show a highly significant difference between both groups (5.81×10 4 ±0.7 compared to 1.93×10 4 ±0.09, p<0.001).
A Fisher’s exact test confirmed a highly significant association between stimulus type and sentence production ( p < .001, OR = 143.75), demonstrating that the target stimuli successfully and reliably elicited subjective motion sentences compared to controls.
The collapsed data revealed a highly significant group×prime type interaction ( F (2,148) = 23.9, P <.001).