Barely Significant

Excerpts

5,163 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantP =0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Data from six animals revealed mean peak MRI signal changes of 5.3±0.9% during wtCGRP injection, compared with changes of 1.2±0.1% during injection of aCSF alone; the difference between wtCGRP and vehicle was highly significant ( t -test P =0.001).
Molecular imaging with engineered physiology.
Nat Commun · 2016 · PMC5146284
highly significantP <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
001, see also the highly significant clip-type × movement-type interaction ( F (1,13)=105.8, P <0.001, all post hoc tests P values <0.001): this shows that during correction-power grips, participants were truly performing a movement correction, changing trajectory from a higher (that is, precision grip position) to a lower one (that is, power grip position) during the reaching phase.
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In contrast to the highly significant ( P < 0.001) ANO1 current reduction (Fig. 4a ), SR Ca 2+ release was indistinguishable ( P > 0.05) from control scrambled siRNA expressing myotubes (Fig. 4b ), indicating that the observed ANO1 current reduction cannot be attributed to putative siRNA off-target effects hampering SR Ca 2+ release.
highly significantp = 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
4C becoming highly significant (both increasing vs increasing-decreasing p = 0.001; both increasing vs other p = 0.013; both decreasing vs increasing-decreasing p < 0.001; both decreasing vs other p < 0.001; LME post-hoc tests, Tukey correction), as well as the difference between increasing-decreasing and other pairs becoming significant ( p = 0.040).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The model can make predictions of the WNP TC density averaged over the WNP (0°–60°N,100°E–180°) during June–August, which corresponds to the first half of the WNP TC season 34 , with a highly significant skill ( r = 0.67, p < 0.001) for the first summer (Fig. 5a ) and a moderate skill ( r = 0.39, p = 0.017) for the second summer (Fig. 5b ).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The lower prevalence of parasitism in the naïve catfish treatment was highly significant (Generalised Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with binomial error distribution, n = 509 host clutches; naïve vs. experienced catfish: z = 4.31, P < 0.001; naïve vs. highly experienced catfish: z = 3.60, P < 0.001), but the probability of parasitising cichlid clutches did not differ between experienced and highly experienced catfish ( z = 0.75, P = 0.452) (Supplementary Table 2 ).