Excerpts

It should be noted that the difference in tumor volumes among the groups of DTX-micelles and blank micelles as well as saline was highly significant (P < 0.01).

Statically significant differences were designated at p < 0.05, and extremely significant differences at p < 0.01.

As can be seen in Table 2 , the coefficients for the linear terms ( X 1 , X 2 and X 3 ) and the quadratic terms ( X 1 2 and X 3 2 ) were highly significant ( p < 0.01).

The reduction in ROS release was highly significant ( p < 0.01). 2.6.

Statistical differences were designated as significant if p-values were less than 0.05 (* p ≤ 0.05), and highly significant if P-values were less than 0.01 (** p ≤ 0.01) or less than 0.001 (*** p ≤ 0.001).

Additionally, the multiple quadratic regression equation between the factors and the response value is expressed as follows: Y = 255.98 + 13.24A + 7.09B − 15.73C − 3.98AB + 4.33AC − 6.01BC − 31.59A 2 − 15.24B 2 − 29.43C 2 The results indicate that the initial medium glucose concentration, shaking speed, and culture temperature have a highly significant impact on ginsenoside Ro yield ( p ≤ 0.01), and the interaction between shaking speed and culture temperature also has a highly significant impact on ginsenoside Ro yield ( p ≤ 0.01).

This deviation was highly significant ( p < 0.01) after 10 days ( Figure 6 B).

Statistical differences were considered as significant if the p-values were below the significance threshold of 0.05 (* p ≤ 0.05) and were considered highly significant if the p -values were less than 0.01 (** p ≤ 0.01) or even less than 0.001 (*** p ≤ 0.001).

The root node, deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, spawns two branches: highly significant ( p < 0.01) and significant ( p < 0.05) values, and non-significant ( p > 0.05) and undetermined (ND) values.

Only miR-15a-5p correlated with blood eosinophils (r = −0.361, p < 0.05), while both miR-15a-5p, miR- and miR-374a-5p showed a significant correlation with the max fall after LAR, and 15b-5p showed a trend towards a correlation (miR-15a-5p: r = −0.447, p < 0.01; miR-15b-5p: r = −0.308, p = 0.076; miR-374a-5p: r = −0.407, p < 0.05). 3.

Statistical differences were stated as significant if the p-values were less than 0.05 (* p ≤ 0.05) and highly significant if the p-values were less than 0.01 (** p ≤ 0.01) or less than 0.001 (*** p ≤ 0.001).

The results of a Student’s t -test showed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.01) between the sorption behavior of peanut protein to PCT at a nearly neutral pH of 6.8 and pH 5.5, even though the difference in pH was only 1.3.

Log 10 (hepcidin) showed a decreasing trend over time, with significant differences on Day 2 and all time points thereafter ( p < 0.01 on Days 2, 4, 7, 11, 14, 21, and 28 vs.

An extremely significant difference was expressed with “**” when p < 0.01.

Differences were considered significant when * p < 0.05, and extremely significant when ** p < 0.01.

Serum TMAO showed a highly significant positive correlation with colonic NLRP3, IL-18, and TNF-α ( p < 0.01) and a significant positive correlation with kidney NLRP3 and IL-1β ( p < 0.05).

Similarly, TG (12:0e_8:0_14:0) revealed a highly significant positive correlation with both DG (16:0_20:3) and DG (18:0_16:00) (R = 0.999, p < 0.01).

However, compared to group I, streptococcus and roseburia were significantly different at p < 0.05, while prevotella, SMB53, and phascolarctobacterium were extremely significant different at p < 0.01 in group M ( Figure 6 C).

Statistical Analysis SPSS 17.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) software was used for data analysis, Duncan’s test was used to test significance (‘*’ represent p < 0.05, significant; ‘**’ represent p < 0.01, highly significant).

Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA, and it was considered significant when p < 0.05 (*) or considered extremely significant when p < 0.01 (**).

The interaction of different lines and water status has a highly significant effect on CC, LA, PH, NNMS, BN, RWCL, and BIOMASS ( p < 0.01), a significant effect on SWPP ( p < 0.05), and no significant effect on the trait RECL. 2.2.

“**” means extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01). 5.

One and two symbols above the histogram represents a significant difference ( p -value < 0.05) and an extremely significant difference ( p -value < 0.01).

Significant differences were considered at p < 0.05, and extremely significant differences were considered at p < 0.01(* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01). 5.

With increasing concentrations of NPD, a dose-dependent recovery of cells was observed in G2/M, which became highly significant at 25 and 50 μg/mL NPD ( p < 0.01) at 48 h of co-treatment ( Figure 4 c). 2.5.