In contrast, the interaction between accession and treatment for the proportion of vessels among the total number of cells per radial row (V) was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Excerpts
Moreover, there were extremely significant differences of measured indicators at tested concentrations, except CL at 50 μM, between the sample and model groups ( p < 0.001).
At PR60, the control group exhibited a marked and highly significant upregulation ( p < 0.001), while expression in the lidocaine group remained low and was not significantly different from sham.
extremely significantqualified
p value of <0.05 was considered significant; p value of <0.01, highly significant; and p value of <0.001, extremely significant. 5.
Highly significant positive correlations were observed for WGC across all environments, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.63 to 0.91 ( p < 0.001).
The influence of both D a and K L on root-to-shoot translocation is significant, while that of P m is highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Placental release of 8-Isoprostane is about twice as high in women with GDM compared with women who have healthy pregnancies, with this elevation being highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Anova revealed a highly significant genotypic (G) effect ( p < 0.001) for the three variables in both individual and combined seasons ( Table 2 ).
This evidence was further confirmed by PERMANOVA ( Table 2 ), that indicated on the overall dataset (including both KO and WT mice, Table 2 a) highly significant R 2 values for P. aeruginosa infected compared to control mice in lung ( p < 0.001, R 2 = 0.099) and more mild differences for stool ( p < 0.05, R 2 = 0.03) and gut ( p < 0.05, R 2 = 0.04).
The pairwise comparisons of groups with ANOVAs supported these findings ( Table 3 ) and revealed highly significant differences between 4xA and all other groups ( p < 0.001) among all subsets of epiloci.
On the other hand, when correcting for gestational age, in the preterm babies an overall trend of diminishing the percentile was found for all three features ( p < 0.001 in all cases).
At 3 weeks, the effect of the group was not significant (F 2,69 = 0.50, p = 0.61), whereas the number of littermates had a highly significant effect (F 1,69 = 21.6, p < 0.001).
Highly significant genetic variations ( p < 0.001) were observed for HR disease incidence (DI) and disease severity (DS) in both individual and combined analyses.
Sincerely, between two subgroups, there were markedly significant differences of BCRFS among training cohort ( p < 0.001), testing cohort ( p = 0.008), and validating cohort ( p < 0.001).
The highest caspase-3/7 activity was detected in the combined treatment group (Hes + DX), and this increase was statistically highly significant compared with the control group ( p < 0.001).
The model fitted using RSM indicates that the linear term of solvent (X 1 ) was highly significant ( p < 0.001), demonstrating its strong influence on the response, whereas power (X 2 ) and time (X 3 ) did not show significant effects in the linear model.
There was highly significant interaction of image noise and SNR with the GSI and pitch ( p = 0.001).
Two-way ANOVA revealed that, for both compounds, concentration and light fluence each had highly significant effects on cell viability, as well as a significant interaction effect between concentration and fluence (all p < 0.001).
For all functional receptors, data on statistically extremely significant hormone specific binding ( p -value ≤ 0.001) were obtained.
The expansion kinetics of PBLs revealed a highly significant increase ( p < 0.001) in cell numbers in the client-owned group starting from day 8 and in the short-term group starting from day 10, and a significant increase ( p < 0.01) in the long-term shelter group starting from day 10 after CD3/CD28 MicroBeads-mediated activation, compared with non-stimulated cells.
As for the survival, we observed highly significant differences depending on the sex of the animals ( p = 0.001) ( Figure 2 b).
A total of 30 severe and 30 milder cases, matched for age and sex, revealed 42 relevant metabolic peaks—36 linked to disease severity ( p < 0.05), with 3 highly significant ( p < 0.001).
A p -value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant, p -values of <0.01 were regarded as highly significant, and p -values of <0.001 were considered very highly significant. 5.
Among the analyzed metabolites, ten were highly significant ( p < 0.001, Table 2 ) while 38 showed significant differences ( p < 0.05).
One-way ANOVA demonstrated highly significant differences among the three groups for all markers ( p < 0.001).