The hybrids showed highly significant (P < 0.001) differences and wide range of yield performance across the test locations.
Excerpts
Table 2 , Table 3 , Table 4 show that the model was highly significant (P < 0.001) and all misfit terms were greater than 0.05, indicating that the model is effective for data analysis and can better simulate the effects of three independent variables: pH, time, and concentration on the removal rate of Cd [ 29 ].
There were highly significant differences between most irrigation trials at (p < 0.001) as indicated by the LSD values.
As indicated in Table 1 , the comparison between the four groups was statistically highly significant (p < 0.001).
Furthermore, the main operational parameters and the interaction effects of some parameters are all highly significant (p ≤ 0.001).
The grain yield was found to be highly significant (P < 0.001) when analyzed against N levels in both seasons of the BBF and camber bed experiments.
A highly significant (P < 0.001) positive correlation was recorded among maize grain yield, RUE and gross margin ha −1 ( Table 7 ). 4.
Negative correlations between salinity and DO were highly significant (R = −0.273, p < 0.001) ( Table 5 ). 4.
Accordingly they showed that a highly significant variation (p < 0.001) in analysis of all the evaluated orange fleshed sweet potato traits.
The depths avowed more highly significant (p < 0.001) SOC stocks in topsoils (0–30 cm depth) than that of the subsoils (30–60 cm depth) in the two cropping systems.
In terms of changes before and after each session, GLMM results indicated a highly significant post-session main effect on all VAS measures, including perceived stress (β = −18.34, p < 0.001), energy (β = 7.01, p < 0.001), tension (β = −21.78, p < 0.001), and valence (β = 14.13, p < 0.001).
Analysis of variance showed that malting barley grown after non-malting barley crops gave very highly significant ( p < 0.001) grain and biomass yield increments than when malting barley was the preceding crop in these experimental sites (Tables 1 and 2 ).
Effect on serum creatinine, urea, uric acid and albumin Positive control (only lead acetate treated) group showed highly significant (P < 0.001) increase in serum creatinine, urea, uric acid and extremely significant (P < 0.001) reduction in albumin levels compared to negative control.
However, highly significant increase (p < 0.001) was observed in the expression levels of SIRT1, Nrf2 and HO-1 in the post-weaning intervention ( Fig. 4 D).
Statistical analysis A statistical analysis of collected data was carried out to highlight the significant differences between the yields of the three kinds of extraction used and investigated species, through the use of GraphPad prism 8.2.263 software, by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), then Tukey test to detect the degree of significance, this significance is taken at the probability of ∗p < 0.05 for a significant difference, ∗∗p < 0.01 for moderately significant difference, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 for a highly significant difference, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001 for a very highly significant difference (a high value of F means that something is significant, while a small value of p means that all results are significant, the null hypothesis (H0) is rejected from p < 0.05). 2.5.
The combined ANOVA in the present study showed highly significant (P < 0.001) differences among sorghum genotypes, test environments, and G×E effects.
Furthermore, the Firmicute to Bacteroidetes ratio (F/B) was highly significant decreased ( P < 0.001) ( Fig. 4 B).
Finally, in RBC there is a clear trend in favor of the Cell Salvage (p < 0.001), although the moderate heterogeneity between studies should be noted ( Fig. 5 ).
ii) Stability of fruit ripening traits across postharvest environments The combined analysis of variance revealed a highly significant (p < 0.001) variation for the main effect of variety, temperature, packaging, and their second and third order interaction for all postharvest traits ( Table 2 ).
The logistic regression analyses showed that the model was highly significant with the six significant variables ( x 2 = 116.54 , p < 0.001 ).
The average of anxiety was 3.81 (SD = 4.99) across all three waves, with a decreasing trend from 4.21 (SD = 5.19) in the first wave, to 3.81 (SD = 4.9) in the second wave, to 3.39 (SD = 4.87) in the third wave (p < 0.001).
All regression analyses were highly significant ( p ≤ 001).
The pairwise comparison for “coronal”/“middle” showed no significance (p = 0.465), whereas that for “coronal”/“apical” and “middle”/“apical” showed highly significant differences (p < 0.001).
All LLRs were highly significant (p < 0.001) with the most coefficients of determination values.
Highly significant results (P > 0.001) were found in all growth and yield parameters.