Excerpts

Specifically, as exhibited in Figure 2 , the analyses of the three-way conditional effect ( B = 0.16; p < 0.05) showed that the interaction between role ambiguity and transformational leadership regarding job satisfaction was significant among respondents holding a position as a supervisor/manager ( B = 0.23; p < 0.001), but only borderline significant among respondents not holding a supervisor/manager position ( B = 0.07, p ≤ 0.05).

In addition, the moderating effect of work meaningfulness was marginally significant ( β =0.08, p =0.05), indicating that the positive relationship between performance pressure and workplace anxiety was strengthened when the level of work meaningfulness was higher ( β =0.81, p <0.001) rather than lower ( β =0.67, p <0.001).

Second, the effect of nonverbal MA (math-related negativity) approached significance, F (1, 39) = 3.94, p = 0.05, partial η 2 = 0.09.

However, there was a strong trend for mean BVPamp [ t (16) = −2.119; p = 0.050; effect size d = 0.51], which was lower during paraphrasing than during taking notes.

The positive correlation between SR and right nucleus accumbens volume was borderline significant [Spearman’s rho (39) = –0.31, p = 0.05].

Both identification with the community and interpersonal contact were uniquely positively related to willingness to participate ( Table 2 ; Step 3c), yet interpersonal contact became only marginally significant ( p = 0.050) 6 .

The regression analysis demonstrated that work time control had a highly significant and positive correlation with job engagement ( b = 3.95, SE = 1.70, p < 0.05) and innovation ( b = 4.67, SE = 0.96, p < 0.01).

The results show that, except for mean fixation duration—which reached a marginally significant level ( p = 0.050)—no significant differences were found between the two proficiency groups in first fixation duration, total fixation duration, total fixation count, mean pupil diameter, or mean eyelid aperture.

However, this difference is only nearly significant ( F = 3.752; p > 0.05) with a small effect size ( d = 0.10), whereas, as regards the relationship with teacher score, significant differences were found with primary school children that score better than secondary school children ( F = 7.647; p < 0.01) with small effect size ( d = 0.14).

Congruency was marginally significant on the P200 amplitude [ F (1, 15) = 4.56, p = 0.05, η p 2 = 0.233], where incongruent conditions showed an enhanced positivity (Figure 3A ).

Children's pupils dilated until digit 6 on average (6.1 ± 2.0), with incremental increases from cue to digit 1, digit 2 to 3, and digit 4 to 5, [all t (68) = 2.7, p < 0.01], and a marginally significant increase from digit 1 to 2 [ t (68) = 2.0, p = 0.05].

The under-16 category players obtain higher scores than the players of the under-18 category in all the factors, although only statistically significant differences appears in Team Cohesion ( p < 0.05.), and a tendency toward significance in the Motivation factor ( p < 0.05).

Breaking the interaction down, there was a marginally significant effect for inhibition control ability in A-2 condition, χ 2 = 3.74, df = 1, p = 0.05, suggesting better inhibition control ability indicates faster response in the A-2 condition.

There was a marginally significant PoA × VOT interaction in medial aspects of the left AC, but only when the extent threshold was reduced to an uncorrected cluster size of p < 0.05, while keeping the peak threshold at p < 0.001.

Similarly, the bivariate correlation between Snail’s walk and the calculation speed ability appears to be slightly significant ( r = −0.24; P < 0.05); eliminating age, the correlation appears strongly significant ( r = −0.31; P < 0.01).

Indeed, Kianga exhibited significantly more affiliative behaviors in the RS period, whereas a trend toward significance ( p = 0.05) was reported for Lubaya.

There was a main effect of motion type ( F1 (2,60) = 11.27, p < 0.0001, η p 2 = 27.3, observed power = 0.99; F2 (2,32) = 9.75, p < 0.0001, η p 2 = 37.9, observed power = 0.972), and a marginally significant effect of verb type in the participants analysis ( F1 (1,30) = 4.16, p = 0.05, η p 2 = 12.2, observed power = 0.506), and in the items analysis ( F2 (1, 16) = 4.14, p = 0.059, η p 2 = 20.5, observed power = 0.481).

We found a marginally significant main effect of Block [ F (1,19) = 4.4, p = 0.050, η p 2 = 0.19], a significant main effect of Type of Trial [ F (1.2,22.5) = 44.43, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.70] and a significant interaction [ F (1.1,21.4) = 54.6, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.74].

A two-way (feedback × base interval) repeated-measures ANOVA indicated a marginally significant main effect of the base interval [ F (1,15) = 4.53, p = 0.050, η p 2 = 0.231], and a significant main effect of feedback [ F (1,15) = 5.80, p = 0.029, η p 2 = 0.279].

Gender also approached significance as a moderator of the relationship between YouTuber attractiveness and PSR (β = −0.18; p = 0.05), and between YouTuber popularity and PSR (β = 0.22; p = 0.07).

In the no-contact condition, the simple main effect of the state of the phone was marginally significant, F (1.49,35.87) = 3.71, p = 0.05, η 2 = 0.011, and the dots distance was significant, F (1.22,29.31) = 5.39, p = 0.02, η 2 = 0.024.

It revealed a main effect of Hemisphere [ F 1 , 41 = 9.24, p = 0.004, η 2 = 0.20], no effect of Condition [ F 2 , 82 = 0.82, p = 0.445, η 2 = 0.02] and a marginally significant interaction between these two factors [ F 2 , 82 = 3.08, p = 0.05, η 2 = 0.07].

Hypothesis testing As predicted, ANOVA analysis (scarcity appeal × need for uniqueness) with purchase intention as the dependent variable indicated that the interaction between the two independent variables was marginally significant ( F (1, 122) = 8.32, p = 0.05, η p 2 = 0.064).

The analysis further revealed an only marginally significant interaction between sequence length and task, F (2,96) = 3.08; p = 0.05; η G 2 < 0.01, indicating that effect of the sequence length may have been slightly more pronounced for verbal recall ( M 5 = 0.804; SD 5 = 0.111; M 6 = 0.753; SD 6 = 0.120; M 7 = 0.689; SD 7 = 0.121) than for tonal recall ( M 5 = 0.750; SD 5 = 0.164; M 6 = 0.682; SD 6 = 0.159; M 7 = 0.658; SD 7 = 0.165).

(2) The degree of political involvement in social networking is negatively related to PWB (H2 does not hold); its effect value was 0.21 ( t = 1.91, p < 0.05), i.e., the more often people participate in political discussions and share relevant information in social networking platforms, the less positive feeling about their life, socialization, and satisfaction or well-being; however, this effect was weakly significant ( p < 0.05).