The analyses between the studied variables yielded highly significant correlation coefficients ( p < 0.01).
Excerpts
The results of the analysis of variance on the mean scores of the subjects across each subscale indicate a highly significant main effect of the strategy [ F (5,654) = 7.117, p < 0.01].
As shown in Appendix , all the AVEs values of all constructs surpasses the 0.50 level ( Fornell and Larcker, 1981 ), and the factor loadings were highly significant ( P < 0.01), ranging from 0.659 to 0.821.
Military performance also indicated positive and highly significant relationships with self-efficacy (MLP&SFE, r = 0.525, p < 0.01).
The effect of cognitive styles, interfaces and their interactions on the AOI of MeSH terms (excluding Interface A) is statistically significant in terms of cognitive style and interface interactions, and weakly significant in terms of cognitive style [ F (1, 188) = 2.79, p < 0.01].
For the new words, the vowel's main effect was highly significant [ F 1 (1, 18) = 14.28, p < 0.01; F 2 (1, 42) = 8.77, p < 0.01].
In both surveys the differences between the answers to the corresponding items Q1 and Q4 were highly significant (one-sided paired t -tests, both P -values < 0.01).
The inverse efficiency data from the same trials showed a highly significant alignment effect [ F (1, 25) = 24.96, p < 0.01, η ^ p 2 = 0.50] after controlling for a general blocking effect [Block: ε ^ GG = 0.73, F (2.18, 54.38) = 12.75, p < 0.01, η ^ p 2 = 0.34].
However, duel success (%) and goal efficiency showed to be important as well and highly significant (dy/dx = 0.0214, p < 0.01, respectively, dy/dx = 0.0193, p < 0.01).
As shown in Figure 3 , the analysis revealed a marginally significant main effect of trustworthiness, F (2,86) = 4.82, p = 0.01, η p 2 = 0.10, BF 10 = 27.008.
Although overall slightly more moderate correlations were reported in this analysis, all correlations were highly significant ( p < 0.01), replicating the results of the original test-retest analysis.
As can be seen from Table 4 Model 3, the negative emotional polarity of online reviews under both factors has an extremely significant negative impact on consumer purchase decisions (α 7 = −10.017, p < 0.01; α 8 = −0.659, p < 0.01).
The model accounted for 25.4% of the variance in growth mindset, yielding a highly significant F-test result ( F = 35.360, p < 0.01), thereby confirming the model's reliability.
There was a highly significant effect of L1-L2 Congruency, with slower reading times for incongruent trials relative to congruent trials (β: 58.38, SE: 17.97, CI: 23.02, 93.83, p < 0.01).
Results The results showed that BSI had highly significant differences in all cognitive ability test items ( p < 0.01); BS had significant differences only in visual attention, visual memory, and motor imitation ( p < 0.05).
All correlations were highly significant ( p < 0.01; see Table 4 ).
Table 6 shows the regression results where the F values in all the models are highly significant ( p < 0.01).
According to the findings, a positive and moderately significant relationship was found between career engagement and perception of professional identity ( r = 0.350, p < 0.01, 95% CI [0.257, 0.436]).
The Model ANOVA results showed that the model is highly significant ( F = 45.00, p < 0.01), providing evidence for the overall predictive power of the model.
The results of the between-subjects effect test, simple effect analysis ( Tables 2 – 4 ), and pairwise comparative analysis of the tennis players’ reaction time when making a stroke landing prediction showed that the main effect of sport level was highly significant [ F (1,42) = 307.854, p < 0.01, η 2 = 0.880].
With Di stimulus set, however, a highly significant correlation was found between tone recognition results and the amount of CI listening experience ( r = 0.601, p = 0.011).
The Mann-Whitney- U -test suggests that the difference in share of positional choice across the EQ levels is highly significant with p = 0.012.
Positive and nearly significant gains were made in working memory, t (9) = 3.1, p = 0.012 and visual processing, t (9) = 2.1, p = 0.067.
In the retained path model for classical psychopathy factors ( Figure 1B - Model 2B), there were still two distinct empathy profiles for primary psychopathy (significant affective impairment, β = −0.255, p < 0.001, and marginally significant cognitive empathy deficits, β = −0.125, p = 0.013) and secondary psychopathy (negative association with cognitive empathy, β = −0.209, p < 0.001 and positive relation with the affective domain, β = 0.111, p = 0.006), although alexithymia was positively related to both factors (β = 0.128, p = 0.005 and β = 0.402, p < 0.001, respectively).
A nominally significant difference emerged between neutral and incongruent reflexives, t (50.9) = -2.52, p = 0.015, d z = −0.41, 95% CI [−0.74, −0.08], though given the exploratory nature of this analysis and the absence of a theoretically motivated account for this pattern in bound-variable contexts, this result should be interpreted cautiously.