The findings demonstrated that stress duration and increasing PEG concentration had a highly significant impact on the growth traits of European birch seedlings (p<0.01); With increasing stress concentration and stress time, antioxidant enzyme activity, membrane lipid peroxidation, and osmoregulatory substance concentrations increased significantly (p<0.01); With increasing stress concentration and du
Excerpts
Under PE mulching, the SWC showed a positively correlated with Pn and DM, with a highly significant correlation with Pn (P ≤ 0.01).
Through WGCNA, we obtained five modules and 29 flavonoid-related metabolites with extremely significant module−metabolite paired relationships (|correlation coefficient|> 0.9, P < 0.01).
Capital letters indicate an extremely significant difference, p < 0.01.
The significance test ( p > 0.05) was passed by the regions that accounted for 23.75% of the total area, while the highly significant test (( p < 0.01) was passed by the regions that accounted for 54.22% of the total area.
Irrigation quota and organic fertilizer application had a highly significant impact on pumpkin vine length and stem diameter (P < 0.01), with a significant interaction between the two factors (P < 0.05).
epigeios in 2018 and 2019, all differences between the two treatments reached a significant ( P < 0.05) or extremely significant ( P < 0.01) level.
NUE, NR, GS, and RV all showed a highly significant positive correlation with pH and EB ( P < 0.01).
ANOVA indicated highly significant effects ( p <0.01) of genotypes, environments, and genotype × environment interactions on PC and OC ( Table 1 ).
3 Results 3.1 Nitrogen inputs in wolfberry farmland under varying water and nitrogen regulations Water, nitrogen and their interactions had highly significant effects ( P < 0.01) on the nitrogen content of irrigation water ( Figure 3A ) and total nitrogen input ( Figure 3B ).
The negative correlation between Pn and NPQ is highly significant (r = −0.74, P ≤ 0.01).
A highly significant positive correlation was observed between amino acids and chemical characteristics ( R = 0.931, p < 0.01), while a negative correlation with salt stress was also found ( R = − 0.915).
By Tukey’s test, treatment 1 was significantly different from treatment 11 ( p < 0.05), and treatment 9 showed highly significant differences compared with treatments 1, 3, 5, and 7 ( p < 0.01).
Regarding structural uniformity, the spatial autocorrelation coefficient of canopy height showed a highly significant positive correlation with yield (Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.82**, P < 0.01), indicating that more uniform distribution of plant height across the field correlates with higher yield.
There was a highly significant negative correlation between NO3-N and AF ( P <0.01) and a significant positive correlation with DM ( P <0.05).
Under drought stress, highly significant differences ( P < 0.01) were observed among varieties and treatments for all parameters, including GR, GP, ShL, RL, SFW, SDW, MDA content, CAT activity, SOD activity, and POD activity ( Table 2 ).
Correspondingly, we uncovered five highly significant correlations (all p -values < 0.01).
A four-way ANOVA of the effect of experimental factors on plant physiological parameters, biomass production, N content, and C:N ratio in plant dry matter ( Table 1 ) showed a statistically highly significant effect of species ( p ≤ 0.01) for most parameters, except C:N ratio where the effect was insignificant.
According to the analysis of variance ( Table 2 ), the interaction terms of X 1 X 2 , X 1 X 4 , X 1 X 5 , X 2 X 3 , X 2 X 5 , X 3 X 4 , X 4 X 5 and X 1 X 2 2 X 3 were extremely significant (p ≤ 0.01), indicating that their interaction can significantly affect the mycelial growth of H. erinaceus .
In this study, highly significant correlations ( p < 0.01) were observed among all pomological traits examined.
Statistical significance of the effects was indicated as follows: highly significant (** P < 0.01), significant (* P < 0.05), and marginally significant (+ P < 0.1).
The difference between AUC CT across the treatments were highly significant (p <0.01; Figure 8 , top row), but this difference progressively disappeared within the first 4–5 d.
Surprisingly, SbGATA11 showed an extraordinarily significant positive correlation with all genes (p<0.01) except SbGATA15 ( Figure 8B ).
infestans , the r value was 0.94, the linear equation was y = 0.5089x - 8.014 (R 2 = 0.88, p = 0.006), the difference was highly significant (p < 0.01).
Meanwhile, in terms of significance, except for T2D1N2 and T0D3N1, which showed significance (p< 0.05), all other cases showed highly significant (p< 0.01).