Barely Significant

Excerpts

3,349 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally non-significantp -value = 0.05271.1× alpha
Moreover, a PERMANOVA adjusted for differences in dispersion confirmed that the observed effect of sample processing strategy was marginally non-significant ( p -value = 0.0527, F = 5.50, R 2 = 0.38; Supplementary Table S7 ). 3.4 Litophyton and sediment samples maintain dominant bacterial taxa in aquarium settings The Gammaproteobacteria class typically dominated the prokaryotic communities of Litophyton specimens both in the aquarium (average relative abundance of 51%) and the Red Sea (31%), although the Red Sea presented higher variability between samples ( Figure 3A ).
marginally significantp = 0.0541.1× alphagold
However, compost type exhibited a marginally significant effect on nosZ clade II ( p = 0.054), with the relative abundance in SA being higher in BM than in M treatment ( p < 0.05). 4 Discussion Compared to M, BM has been found to reduce CO 2 and N 2 O emissions; yet the degree in reduction is soil-texture dependent ( Gao et al., 2023 ; Yuan et al., 2017 ).
almost significantp = 0.0551.1× alphagold
The results revealed that the total reads of GH families, which were responsible for hemicellulose degradation, were significantly higher in wild and half-blood yaks than in domestic yaks (Welch t -test, p < 0.05) ( Figure 4A ), and the total reads of GH families, which were responsible for cellulose degradation, were almost significant between wild and half-blood yak (Welch t -test, p = 0.055) ( Figure 4B ).
marginally non-significantp = 0.0551.1× alpha
Mean soil heterotrophic respiration was lower in logging gaps relative to intact forest, although this difference was marginally non-significant ( p = 0.055) possibly due to the limited number of samples used in laboratory incubation and high heterogeneity found across all plots ( Table 2 and Supplementary Figure 3G ).
borderline significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
Likewise, we found a significant reduction in the fasting blood glucose level [from 5.8 (5.5–6.4) to 5.6 mmol/L (5.3–6.2), p = 0.02], a numeric, but non-significant, decrease in the fasting insulin levels [from 102 (62–124) to 83 (57–107), p = 0.25], and a borderline significant decrease in homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) [from 3.7 (2.3–4.6) to 2.8 (2.2–3.8), p = 0.056].
a significant trendp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
The stratified analysis, performed to determine the possible interaction of agr functionality on these results revealed a significant trend toward higher biofilm formation in MRSA than MSSA in agr functional strains ( p = 0.056), but not in agr dysfunctional strains ( p = 0.800) indicating that agr functionality is a confounding factor for these results.