Barely Significant

Excerpts

3,862 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp=2.14E-380.0× alphaqualifiedgold
GO enrichments for the lightgreen module are highly significant for “secretory granule” (p=2.14E-38), “secretory vesicle” (p=1.96E-36), and different specific neutrophils-associated terms such as “neutrophil activation involved in immune response” (p=1.04E-35), “neutrophil degranulation” (p=1.04E-35), “neutrophil activation” (p=2.00E-35), and “neutrophil mediated immunity” (p=2.64E-35).
highly significantp < 1 x 10 −300.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Discussion Our GWAS across two cohorts of smallpox vaccine recipients, totaling just over 1,600 individuals, identified a highly significant (p < 1 x 10 −30 ) association signal from a region on chromosome 5 that was linked to significant inter-individual variations in IFNα response to in vitro stimulation with vaccinia virus.
highly significantp = 1E −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, while the difference between term and moderate to late preterm TREC was significant but not meaningful, 108 (70–170) vs 101 (64–164) median TREC ( p = 0.0017), the differences between term and extremely preterm, 49 (29–92), or very preterm, 88 (52–149), were both highly significant ( p = 1E −16 , p = 4E −6 , respectively) and meaningful.
highly significantP<10 -150.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Scatter plots of the log2FC values for differentially expressed genes in the tetramer+ cells arising in response to each pMHCII-NP type confirmed highly significant correlations among the scRNAseq profiles of the different tetramer specificities (P<10 -15 ; >60% of all the genes in each comparison undergo similar levels of upregulation or downregulation as compared to Tconv cells) ( Figure 2C ).
Although the majority of the findings in these included studies did not reach statistical significance, the overall efficacy assessment indicated that SLIT demonstrated effectiveness in pediatric AR patients (SS: SMD=-0.52, 95%CI=-0.75~-0.29, p = 3.17e-10, I2=0%, Egger’s test: p = 0.74; MS: SMD=-0.24, 95%CI=-0.37~-0.11, p = 0.0356, I2=78.68%, Egger’s test: p = 0.34) ( Figure 6 ).
highly significantp=4.85e-090.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Indeed, there was a highly significant overlap between the proteins that increased during the 3 rd trimester and decreased post-partum (13/33 proteins, odds ratio (OR): 98.9, p=4.85e-09, Fisher’s exact test, Figure 4B ) and, conversely, between the downregulated proteins during the 3 rd trimester and the ones upregulated post-partum (13/44 proteins, OR: 29.9 , p=1.73e-05, Figure 4C ).