showed a trendP = 0.065
Although the HAIT-M-P group showed a trend toward better OS than the HAIT group, the difference did not reach statistical significance (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.19 – 1.07, P = 0.065; Figure 2D ).
Although the HAIT-M-P group showed a trend toward better OS than the HAIT group, the difference did not reach statistical significance (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.19 – 1.07, P = 0.065; Figure 2D ).
Conclusion Compared with HAIT alone, HAIT-M-P was associated with improved PFS and tumor response rates, and showed a possible trend toward improved OS in patients with locally aggressive erHCC, which warrants further validation.