“weakly significant”

There was higher mortality in healthcare-associated (73.1%, n=19) than community-acquired (26.9%, n=7) IE; the associations were weakly significant (P = .049).

However, of the drugs that were significant in the bivariate analysis, only fibrates remained weakly significant in the multivariate analysis (OR 1.69, 95% CI = 1.00 to 2.83, P = 0.049).

We caution, however, that by including observer as a random factor for consistency with other models violated diagnostic tests, and there was a weakly significant negative association of beak length with elevation in the best fit model ( p = 0.049), which included observer as a fixed factor, and met model assumptions (Table S4 ), with longer beaks relative to body size at lower latitudes.

Among the sepsis patients, the association between delirium and the risk for mortality was weakly significant (nondelirium vs. delirium: 9.1% vs. 47.1%, p = .049) ( Table 1 ).

This difference was weakly significant ( p = 0.0497) at 21 weeks after surgery.

The value on the 2nd day of phenobarbital treatment differed to a weakly significant extent (P < 0 .05) from the control value.

Considering the change in each contrast individually pretraining and post-training, there was a weakly significant effect of training ( F (1,25) = 4.2; p = 0.05), but no effect of contrast ( F (4,25) = 0.6) or interaction ( F (4,25) = 0.6), shown in Figure 5 D .

In gliotic tissues only weak expression of ActR-I or BMPR-I was seen in a few cases (Table I). A weakly significant correlation of ActR-I staining with the degree of malignancy was found when all three groups were taken together (n =21, P < 0.05).

The first two axes (both weakly significant, p < 0.05, ANOVA by axis) explain only 5.4% of the fitted model, with temperature significantly influencing the larvae assemblage ( p < 0.01, ANOVA by term).

For headache, lemborexant C av,ss was a weakly significant predictor (at the P < .05 level); however, the probability of experiencing this adverse event was noted to decrease with increasing exposure under the linear logit model (Table 4 ).

(2) The degree of political involvement in social networking is negatively related to PWB (H2 does not hold); its effect value was 0.21 ( t = 1.91, p < 0.05), i.e., the more often people participate in political discussions and share relevant information in social networking platforms, the less positive feeling about their life, socialization, and satisfaction or well-being; however, this effect was weakly significant ( p < 0.05).

Additionally, including those at a weakly significant (p ≤ 0.05) level, our approach has five entries correlating three of the four vertices’ mixture fractions to clinical subtypes, while PyClone has four entries across three of the four clusters’ mixture fractions to clinical subtypes.

The rise of long-range gamma coherence between the posterior and prefrontal areas was significant for coherent communications that crossed the midline (Interhemisphere) for both Pt1 ( P < 0.001) and Pt3 ( P < 0.001), although intrahemispheric synchrony (Intrahemisphere) was also weakly significant ( P < 0.05) for Pt3 at ND ( Fig. 4 H ).

There was a weakly significant interaction between time and MPSS ( p = 0.05) ( Table 4 ).

Thus, according to the Tukey multiple comparison test, significant differences regarding the decrease in EA.hy296 endothelial cell viability were reported between the minimum and maximum concentrations studied, after 24 h of treatment, in the case of all liposomes tested ( Figure 16 ), except the CLDM2CP-1 variant, where insignificant or weakly significant decreases in cell viability were recorded (* p ≤ 0.05 and ** p ≤ 0.01).

This correlation was also weakly significant in the air reference frame in the low altitude flight condition data (linear mixed-effects models: P <0.05; Table 2 ).

The signal was weakly significant ( p < 0.05 for all 4 LPCs) at 1000 μg/L ES and was not significant at lower concentrations.

Weakly significant (0.01 < P < 0.05) differences were observed for enrofloxacin-resistant bacteria on farms O1 and C2 as well as for cefquinome-resistant bacteria on farms O1 and C1.

The SEM diagrams represent aggregate responses of complex bacterial systems to abiotic drivers, and as such, it is not surprising that many of these links were relatively weak or weakly significant ( p < 0.05).

Despite some weakly significant indifferences, anti-N IgM indicated no increase over the naïve negative (NEG) population (n = 64; p < 0.05; IgM median MFI: Nucleoprotein SS:183, AA:135, SA:134, NEG:184) as was the case for IgA ( p > 0.05; IgA median MFI: Nucleoprotein SS:53, AA:40, SA:46, NEG:48).

The calculated PhiPT (0.081) was weakly significant ( p < 0.05).

P -values were considered weakly significant if 0.1 ≥ P > 0.05 and statistically significant if P ≤ 0.05.

MABs transduced with MLV WT -EFS showed a comparable fold differentiation index compared to no vector control MABs that was only weakly significant ( Figures 7 A and 7C; Kruskall-Wallis with uncorrected Dunn’s test, ∗p < 0.05).

Furthermore, scant chewing could be associated with autonomous nervous system dysfunction leading to impaired gastric motor function.[ 24 , 25 ] Breakfast consumption was negatively associated with IBS prevalence, but in the last model and after adjustment of all potential confounders, the relation became weakly significant ( P = 0.05).

For late RGR, we found a weakly significant effect of drought history ( χ 2 1 =3.96, P =0.05).