Barely Significant
← all phrases

“weakly significant”

1,388 sentences · 1,388 papers · 1,784 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.11

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

weakly significantp = 0.04710.9× alphaqualifiedgold
Within the PfRH5-specific CD4 + T cell population, we observed a trend toward a higher proportion of CXCR5 + (cTfh) cells in protein/AS01 B as compared to ChAd63-MVA vaccinees at all post-vaccination time points ( Figure 2 B), which was weakly significant at day 7 (p = 0.0471).
weakly significantp=0.04791.0× alphaqualifiedgold
What underlying mechanisms related to resilience (e.g., coping skills, social support access, emotional regulation) might explain these differences? Conflicting Results on Suicidality Moderation: The abstract and results text state minimal moderation effect on suicidality overall, yet Table 3 shows significant moderation for EN*Resilience on lifetime ideation, PA*Resilience on lifetime behaviour (p=0.0479, weakly significant), and TACEs*Resilience on recent behaviour (p=0.0514, borderline).
weakly significantp=0.0481.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For obese patients in the range 30–40 kg/m 2 versus those with a normal BMI, the estimated sub-HR for revision was weakly significant for THR (15.7% increase, 95% CI 0.2% to 33.7%, p=0.048) but not for TKR (17.9% increase, 95% CI −1.9% to 41.6%, p=0.079).
weakly significantp = 0.0481.0× alphaqualifiedgold
No evidence for isolation by distance was observed with the microsatellites ( p = 0.357; Additional file 1 : Figure S2a), 6721 RAD loci ( p = 0.108; Additional file 1 : Figure S2b) or WRR4 ( p = 0.489; Additional file 1 : Figure S2d), but RPM1 showed a weakly significant association between genetic and geographic distance ( p = 0.048; Additional file 1 : Figure S2c).
weakly significantP = 0.0491.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A subsequent memory contrast within this cluster indicated greater positivity for mismatched targets that were subsequently remembered (hits) relative to mismatched targets that were subsequently forgotten (misses) in the attentive group, although this effect was only weakly significant in a t -test [ t (12) = 2.185, P = 0.049, two-tailed; Fig. 3E] and a Bayesian equivalent indicated that the evidence was only anecdotal (BF10 = 1.628).