Differences in the number of QTLs among the six “plant compartment × seasons’ were weakly significant (generalized linear model [GLM], F = 2.30, P = 0.0471).
← all phrases
“weakly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.11
In the literature
Within the PfRH5-specific CD4 + T cell population, we observed a trend toward a higher proportion of CXCR5 + (cTfh) cells in protein/AS01 B as compared to ChAd63-MVA vaccinees at all post-vaccination time points ( Figure 2 B), which was weakly significant at day 7 (p = 0.0471).
What underlying mechanisms related to resilience (e.g., coping skills, social support access, emotional regulation) might explain these differences? Conflicting Results on Suicidality Moderation: The abstract and results text state minimal moderation effect on suicidality overall, yet Table 3 shows significant moderation for EN*Resilience on lifetime ideation, PA*Resilience on lifetime behaviour (p=0.0479, weakly significant), and TACEs*Resilience on recent behaviour (p=0.0514, borderline).
californica presence had a weakly significant negative relationship with PC1 ( P = 0.048).
For obese patients in the range 30–40 kg/m 2 versus those with a normal BMI, the estimated sub-HR for revision was weakly significant for THR (15.7% increase, 95% CI 0.2% to 33.7%, p=0.048) but not for TKR (17.9% increase, 95% CI −1.9% to 41.6%, p=0.079).
We found that PG M1-PTN alignment was weakly significant for the split containing trials with above-median EMG (p=0.048), but not for the split containing trials with the lower EMG level (p=0.15).
However, there was a weakly significant interaction between area and condition ( F (33,396) = 1.473, p = 0.048).
Temperature was only a weakly significant predictor of gene expression ( p = 0.048) with no significant species by temperature interaction.
This association was weakly significant ( p = 0.048).
The result of the multilocus HKA test was weakly significant ( P = 0.048).
Overall there was a weakly significant effect in a Meta-analysis of all the samples studied ( table 3 , using random effects model z = 1.98, p = 0.048).
A weakly significant ( p = 0.048) negative relation between tea consumption and direct HDL cholesterol was observed. 4.
No evidence for isolation by distance was observed with the microsatellites ( p = 0.357; Additional file 1 : Figure S2a), 6721 RAD loci ( p = 0.108; Additional file 1 : Figure S2b) or WRR4 ( p = 0.489; Additional file 1 : Figure S2d), but RPM1 showed a weakly significant association between genetic and geographic distance ( p = 0.048; Additional file 1 : Figure S2c).
A weakly significant interaction was observed between the density treatment and the mixed and monoculture planting treatments (Table 2 ; F 1, 103 = 3.988, p = .048).
Husband’s education was negatively associated with PHQ scores, although this was weakly significant (−0.590, p = 0.048).
There is also a weakly significant tendency for ROS to be lower in males with redder abdomens (color P = 0.048, no color*lake interaction, and a significant lake*Thersitina interaction P = 0.012), although this trend is not significant within any individual lake.
The N/P ratio for non-conditioned controls was weakly significant between ZT03 and ZT11 (p = 0.0486) and was unaffected by conditioning at any ZT.
Tibias treated with wildtype FGF10 showed no growth inhibition at 100 ng/ml (97.2 ± 2.3%; not significant) and a weakly significant inhibition at 300 ng/ml (86.8 ± 4.6%; p =0.0489) compared to untreated control tibias.
32 Possession of one or two copies of APOE ɛ 4 was very significant for African Americans ( p < 0.0001) but only weakly significant for Yoruba people ( p = 0.049).
A subsequent memory contrast within this cluster indicated greater positivity for mismatched targets that were subsequently remembered (hits) relative to mismatched targets that were subsequently forgotten (misses) in the attentive group, although this effect was only weakly significant in a t -test [ t (12) = 2.185, P = 0.049, two-tailed; Fig. 3E] and a Bayesian equivalent indicated that the evidence was only anecdotal (BF10 = 1.628).
There was a weakly significant trend towards nest boxes at site II being occupied significantly earlier comparing to the site I (Tukey’s post hoc test, p = 0. 049).
Phagocytosis The procedure of radiolabeling and catheter passage had no significant effect on phagocytosis of unstimulated and IL4, IL10/TGFβ1 activated cells, but a weakly significant increased phagocytosis of 62 ± 20% ( p = 0.049) was recorded in LPS/IFNγ activated cells.
However, of the drugs that were significant in the bivariate analysis, only fibrates remained weakly significant in the multivariate analysis (OR 1.69, 95% CI = 1.00 to 2.83, P = 0.049).
Both CGR and CNR were negatively related to the R axis (R 2 = 0.11 and R 2 = 0.04 respectively), but only the relationship with CGR was weakly significant ( P = 0.049 and P = 0.223 respectively).
Overall, a higher rate of pR was obtained when the anti-EGFR was combined with an irinotecan vs an oxaliplatin chemotherapy backbone, but difference was weakly significant (72% vs 53% P =0.049).