Item 17, I feel lonely even when I am with other people , was very close to statistical significance, improving at all three follow‐ups ( p = 0.052).
← all phrases
“very close to statistical significance”
In the literature
Results also showed that the indirect effect of ToM on social preference through externalizing behavior was very close to statistical significance ( z = 1.94, p = 0.052).
Regarding the number of granulocytes, in AD it was much lower than in HCs, and the result was very close to statistical significance (U = 418; p = 0.053; p (BH) = 0.053; r G = −0.23).
Moreover, a non-significant but very close to statistical significance ( p = 0.053) difference was noted for the TAG concentration change from w0 to w9.
Thus, in our cohort, a high perioperative ∆CL of ≥20 mm showed a five-time higher preterm birth rate <34 weeks, very close to statistical significance ( p = 0.054).
We then examined whether gilz expression was related to the PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio and found that the correlation between gilz expression and a PaO 2 /FiO 2 below 100 was very close to statistical significance ( p = 0.054) (data not shown).
The association of CNV or mutation with OS within the whole PI3KCA/AKT pathway was very close to statistical significance (p = 0.055) ( Fig 1 ).
This relationship is very close to statistical significance ( p = 0.055).
There were no significant differences between the two groups, and only the sexual abuse difference is very close to statistical significance ( p = 0.055).
There were no significant differences between the first and second visits in any group, though the clonazepam group showed values very close to statistical significance ( p = 0.055).
The difference was very close to statistical significance ( P = 0.055).
A correlation, very close to statistical significance, with a better outcome was also demonstrated for the previous use of TMP/SMX prophylaxis (OR[95%CI] 0.27 [0.07–1.03], p = 0.055).
In ‘physiological-folate’ conditions, FU IC 50 ranged from 0.6 to 25.4 μ M (median 8.4) in the 10 cell lines exhibiting wt A/A 1298 variant, whereas IC 50 were comprised between 0.3 and 7.3 (median 2.9) in the nine cell lines exhibiting mutated A/C or C/C 1298 variants; this difference was very close to statistical significance (Mann–Whitney, P =0.055).
This difference came very close to statistical significance ( p = 0.056).
Furthermore, in nSATB, CD4+ percentage reduction is very close to statistical significance ( P = 0.057) and has an evidently lower mean value than the one of HC.
Does readability predict recruitment success? The equation used to identify associations with successful recruitment was very close to statistical significance (deviance χ 2 (14) = 23.19, P = 0.057).
Satellite cell number declined 15% on average during the transition and trended very close to statistical significance (p = 0.057; Figure 4C ), and declines were observed in four out of the five women ( Figure 4D ).
The results of the ANOVA indeed showed a main effect of Group very close to statistical significance [ F (1, 15) = 4.21, p = 0.058, η 2 = 0.219], indicating that, in general, the experimental group obtained better results than the controls in QPhys.
There was a difference of 0.071 L in favour of BDP/FF very close to statistical significance ( p = 0.058) and this result is in line with previous studies comparing the superiority of fixed combination vs.
Results of the Kruskal Wallis test highlighted some interesting aspects: the physical burden perceived by the caregivers, measured with the CBI, diminished significantly from T0 to T1 (Chi Squared = 6,483; p = .01); health literacy, instead, increased and it was very close to statistical significance (Chi Squared = 3,560; p = .059) (see Table 3 ).
very close to statistical significancep = 0.0591
In the case of hemopexin, one of the two peptides was very close to statistical significance (p = 0.0591) and since it had been previously validated by western blot this validation by SRM was accepted.
very close to statistical significanceP = 0.0597
However, the results for females from the overweight group were very close to statistical significance (tertile 2: β = −10.69, 95% CI: −21.79, 0.41, P = 0.0597; tertile 3: β = −11.64, 95% CI: −25.19, 1.90, P = 0.0926).
In turn, obesity had a p -value that was very close to statistical significance ( p = 0.06).
While the tendency is clearly visible, the analysis of absolute numbers is very close to statistical significance, but due to relatively small number of patients does not reach it in Chi2 test ( p = 0.06 and 0.08).
In our study, all of the patients who underwent PPMI were patients with type 1 L-R fusion and this result was very close to statistical significance ( p = 0.06).