Meanwhile, associations with p values ≥0.0028 and <0.05 are regarded as suggestive of significance.
← all phrases
“suggestive of significance”
In the literature
A two-sided p-value of less than 0.05 was considered as suggestive of significance.
P values between 1.68 × 10 −5 (for MS, 2.04 × 10 −5 for NBL, and 1.06 × 10 −5 for YBL) and 0.05 were considered to be suggestive of significance.
A q -value of 0.2 was used to identify CpG sites that are suggestive of significance, and a stricter p -value cutoff of 9E-8 was used to call highly significant differentially methylated CpG sites ( Mansell et al., 2019 ).
Objective A recent high-density fine-mapping (ImmunoChip) study of genetic associations in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) identified 14 risk loci with validated genome-wide significance, as well as a number of loci showing associations suggestive of significance ( P = 5 × 10 −5 < 5 × 10 −8 ), but these have yet to be replicated.
These 64 VIP genes are known to be expressed in hepatocytes, and owing to the reduced multiple testing burden, we considered a nominal p < 0.05 suggestive of significance.
The resistance index was suggestive of significance in Group C.
Apart from tests of the a priori hypotheses, only P -values <0.01 should be regarded as suggestive of significance, and results should be regarded as exploratory.
A p -value < 0.005 was considered statistically significant and <0.05 as suggestive of significance. 25 STROBE Guidelines For this article, the STROBE reporting guidelines for observational studies was used. 26 Data Availability Data are available in anonymized form and can be shared by request form any qualified investigator.
However, since the GWAS was deemed exploratory, we also considered SNPs with p -values below 5 × 10 −5 as suggestive of significance.
Results with 0.025 ≤ p < 0.05 were considered suggestive of significance.
Our results are suggestive of significance of competitive and cooperative interactions in the periodontitis as a novel mechanism of bacterial symbiosis.
In light of the relatively small number of independent tests being run within each independent locus, we considered results with an empirical P value of <0.05 suggestive of significance.
Furthermore, those patients whose tumours neither expressed telomerase nor ALT had the highest survival rate with a lower HR for death than those expressing telomerase or the ALT phenotype, although this was only suggestive of significance when adjusted for tumour grade.
A p -value of less than 0.05 was suggestive of significance for this study in view of evaluating the previously 5 significant SNPs.
p -values falling within the range of 0.00357–0.05 were considered suggestive of significance ( 17 ).
P values falling within the range of 0.00357 to 0.05 were considered suggestive of significance[ 18 ].