“slightly significant”

Treatment with dsAPL1C may incur a slightly significant survival cost (p = 0.01, Cox HR = 1.3, 99% CI 0.9–1.7; Table 2 and Fig. 6 A).

In the same fashion, there was a slightly significant difference ( p = 0.011) between the 1 μL and 10 μL DTaP groups in the locomotion assay ( Figure 4 b); however, the heroin-induced hyperlocomotion was still reduced in these two groups compared to the control animals.

On average, simulans individuals comprised 53% of the total matings relative to 47% of the introgression individuals, which did turn out to be slightly significant (Wilcoxon test: χ 2 = 6.4, p <0.011).

Of note, the nonobese-T2D blood metabolite data had a slightly significant enrichment in phosphatidylinositols (P = 0.012) and a slight depletion in lipids (P = 0.022) (See Table S3).

Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure showed a highly significant difference when comparing the snoring group to the unaffected group ( p < 0.001) and a slightly significant difference when comparing the OSA group to the control ( p = 0.012 and p = 0.045, respectively).

In particular, the coefficient of t is negative and significant (p-values=3.144e-32, 0.0001, and 0.0006, respectively, for Olympic and 0.008, 0.025 and 0.023, respectively, for APEC), while the coefficient of t-squared is positive and slightly significant (p-values=0.012 and 0.053 for Olympic and 0.003 and 0.004 for APEC).

Perfusion of 200 μM of each of the peptides (n = 6) produced a slightly significant reduction in peak amplitude (Fig. 11 c; command voltage = + 30: control = 3045 ± 68; kunitz4-b = 2685 ± 51.3, p = 0.012; kunitz4-c = 2816 ± 43.1, p = 0.032) and the steady-state current (control = 2468 ± 39; kunitz4-a = 2115 ± 34.6, p = 0.045; kunitz4-c = 2031 ± 42.1, p = 0.04), whereas 200 μM of kunitz4-a (n = 6) produced a non-significant peak current.

For the middle two distant bins, a slightly significant difference was observed between LPS coated wire and LPS + PEG coated wire [bin 2 (150–250 μm from edge of wire): LPS RI = 2.31, LPS + PEG RI = 1.37, p = 0.012; bin 3 (250–350 μm from edge of wire): LPS RI = 2.73, LPS + PEG RI = 1.73, p = 0.03].

These four effect sizes had slightly significant differences (Q = 12.669, p = 0.013).

Consistently, we observe a modest and slightly significant difference in the k/λ ratio between the two groups ( p = 0.013), further confirming that the FLC increase is likely to occur because of a nonspecific B-cell activation in the inflammatory process induced by SARS-CoV-2.

Post hoc analysis clarified that skeletal class III patients were indistinguishable from the control sample, whereas patients with skeletal class II still showed slightly significant differences concerning total antagonism ( p = 0.013) and posterior antagonism ( p = 0.035).

Regarding the other two model sections, i.e., inflammation and red blood markers, it should be noted that the slope-lag-time and the slope-CRP residual correlations were slightly significant, ρ = − 0.233 ( P = 0.013) and ρ = 0.160 ( P = 0.033), respectively.

When adding a year term to regressions, however, we only found a slightly significant advancement in predicted flowering time at 10°C over time in Germany ( t = −2.5, p = 0.0135) but otherwise, we did not find any significant change in predicted phenology over time (Table S14 ).

Three-way ANOVA test with interactions among variables present that differences of HBM-fecal and treatment timepoint and the three groups and treatment are slightly significant ( P value = 0.014 and 0.034, respectively).

Root movement distance also demonstrated a slightly significant positive correlation with OIRR in both RFT (r = 0.2955, P = 0.0140) and VPT (r = 0.2790, P = 0.0206), supporting the notion that greater root movement might lead to increased resorption.

However, in contrast to the virulence assays we observed a slightly significant difference between germination frequency for PG2 bean isolates and PG3 bean isolates (p = 0.014).

In particular, male participants who were categorized as impacted by COVID-19 had a slightly significant higher mean PHQ-9 score than those who were not impacted (4.38 ± 5.11 versus 2.80 ± 3.65, respectively; p = 0.015).

These effects were qualified by a slightly significant interaction, F (12, 300) = 2.12, p = 0.015, η p 2 = 0.078.

On the other hand, we find a slightly significant deficit of PS genes on the Y chromosome (p = 0.015 when controlled for anatomical systems, and p = 0.05 when controlled for cell types).

Our transformations did not produce a normal distribution for ALM/BMI, which had a tendency toward a bimodal distribution, although non‐normality was slightly significant based on the Shapiro–Wilk test ( p = 0.018).

There was a slightly significant difference in disease duration for the genetic ( p = .018) and clinical groups ( p = .042), but not for the pathological group ( p = .084, ANOVA).

The contrast between the HS group and the MwA group was slightly significant ( r = 0.17, p = 0.018) at p < 0.05 FDR corrected (Fig. 1 ).

There was a slightly significant difference in Visual Search ( p = 0.018), and no differences in RAVLT-I (p = 0.323), and RAVLT-D ( p = 0.155) scores.

Comparison of protein levels (LFQ intensity) to the patients’ preoperative PTA showed a slightly significant correlation between preoperative PTA and level of phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP) (Pearson r = −0.3658; p = 0.0187) shown in Figure 3 .

Comparing the variances of the CVi between the two experimental days also revealed slightly significant differences ( P ≈ 0.019).