Significance was considered as follows for p -values: p < 0.05 (*) slightly significant, p < 0.01 (**) medium significant, and p < 0.001 (***) highly significant.
← all phrases
“slightly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.06p=0.09
In the literature
GSH is distinguished by slightly higher concentrations in the samples from the pond; the difference between the batch grown in natural conditions and the one in the RAS is, however, slightly significant according to Šídák’s multiple comparisons test ( p < 0.01) in the liver and intestine ( Figure 1 D).
The time to event analysis of all‐cause mortality had a slightly significant advantage in favor of NP‐guided therapy (HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.69–0.95; p = 0.01; I 2 = 0%).
With the increase in sample size ( n = 7), the abundance differences in arabidopsides A and B were now slightly significant ( p < 0.01 and 0.05, respectively) when comparing 35% D 2 O and H 2 O.
1 , indicating a slightly significant positive association between PRL and LH/FSH ratio ( r = 0.1, P = 0.01).
For antioxidant activity, the samples (P1–P7) displayed high capacity to scavenge DPPH free radicals with slightly significant differences ranging from 78.37 ± 0.25 to 87.21 ± 0.05 at p -value ≤0.01.
Statistical analysis results show no significant difference in each period for the Baumann angle (p=0.368), but a slightly significant decrease in the LHCA at the long-time period (p=0.01).
The permutation analysis of variance among the phloem mycobiome also showed slightly significant differences (R 2 = 0.04, F = 2.60, p = 0.01) among the watering treatments (Fig. 5 ).
In both statistical analyses, the significance was set at three levels for descriptive purposes: slightly significant for p < 0.05 (green), moderately significant for p < 0.01 (yellow), and highly significant for p < 0.001 (orange). 3 Results and Discussion The section is organized presenting first the results for the AA phase followed by the findings in the TPH and steady SupplO 2 phases.
The significance level of p ≤ 0.05 was chosen (slightly significant: p ≤ 0.05; moderately significant: p ≤ 0.01; highly significant: p ≤ 0.001). 3.
A slightly significant association was found between cholongiocarcinoma and p-Akt expression (p = 0.01) and TGF-α expression (0.03).
Treatment with dsAPL1C may incur a slightly significant survival cost (p = 0.01, Cox HR = 1.3, 99% CI 0.9–1.7; Table 2 and Fig. 6 A).
For those who had a lower narcissistic personality score (the real line), death anxiety also had a slightly significant effect on eudaimonic well-being, β = −0.11, t = −4.09, p < 0.01, 95% CI [−0.17, −0.06].
ANOVA analysis was used to test whether changes between the treatments were significant (significant P ≤ 0.005; and slightly significant P < 0.01). 3.
At 80 kV, a slightly significant enhancement of CNR w with increasing microbubble concentration was registered (p = 0.01) (Fig. 3c ).
For CD, age exhibited a slightly significant HR of 1.04 (95% CI 1.01–1.07, p = 0.010).
The statistics software was SPSS 20.0 (IBM SPSS statistics, Armonk, NY) and the significance was subdivided into three levels for descriptive purposes: slightly significant for p < 0.05 (*), moderately significant for p < 0.01 (+) and highly significant for p < 0.001 (#). 3.
There were no statistical differences for Pb concentrations for date (P = 0.175) and depth (P = 0.495), but the interaction was slightly significant (P < 0.01).
The results in Figures 1a,b , corresponding to the findings done by an automated LUNA cell counter show that disperse dyes Brown 1, Blue 124, Blue 1 and Tartrazine had a very significant ( p < 0.0001) and a slightly significant ( p = 0.01) reduction of viability of MPEK-BL6 and IPEC-J2 cells when exposed to the high and low concentrations of these dyes, respectively.
However, in the endothelium-denuded rings, indigo carmine (10 -5 M) had no effect on the phenylephrine-induced maximum contraction and produced a slightly significant leftward shift (ED 50 : P < 0.01) in the phenylephrine concentration-response curve ( Fig. 1B , Table 1 ).
The statistical p -value was calculated using an independent t -test and classified into four levels of significance: not significant ( p > 0.05), slightly significant (0.01 < p < 0.05), moderately significant (0.001 < p < 0.01), and highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA through GraphPad Prism, where the level of significance was considered as slightly significant (* p < 0.05), moderately significant (** p < 0.01), and highly significant (*** p < 0.001) for all treatment groups as compared to the control group.
Shoot and root Ca 2+ and shoot and root K + showed slightly significant ( p ≤ 0.01) results between the spinach varieties ( Figure 4 ).
Vascular density: the vascular density was quantified in the whole image (3 × 3 mm), and there was a slightly significant difference between the HbSS group and the control group (p = 0.01) in the SCP (Table 2 , Fig. 4 ).
The batch effect was not significant in Aberdeen ( P = 0.23) and was slightly significant in Taipei ( P = 0.01; Supplementary Table).