Barely Significant
← all phrases

“slightly significant”

1,754 sentences · 1,754 papers · 2,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.06p=0.09

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

slightly significantp < .051.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Interestingly, in this cluster for occasional grandparental childcare propensity, the marginal effect on having a first birth turns positive and slightly significant ( p < .05): that is, on average, the propensity of the grandparents to provide occasional childcare leads to a change in the probability of their adult children having a first birth that is equal to .1.
slightly significantP < 0.051.0× alphaqualifiedgold
∗∗∗A highly significant, ∗∗moderately significant, and ∗∗slightly significant difference (P < 0.05) linked to the regulator was considered as examined by one-way ANOVA.
slightly significantp = .051.0× alphaqualifiedgold
+); moreover, there was a slightly significant difference between the number of neutral (0) metaphorical expressions and the number of negative (−) ones, χ 2 = (1, N = 26) = 3.846, p = .05 (0 vs. −).
Adjective metaphors evoke negative meanings.
PLoS One · 2014 · PMC3929652
a slight significancep-value < 0.051.0× alphaqualifiedgold
slightly significantp-value < 0.051.0× alphaqualifiedgold
8(B) along with a slight significance on day 0 (p-value < 0.05), none of the other daily changes were found to be significant until day 3 of the study (p-value ≪ 0.001), which was also observed to be a slightly significant timepoint for brightness (p-value < 0.05).
slightly significantp ≥ 0.051.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For better interpretation of the results, the significance values were organized into categories according to the level of statistical evidence: **** p < 0.0001 (extremely significant), *** 0.0001 ≤ p < 0.001 (very significant), ** 0.001 ≤ p < 0.01 (significant), * 0.01 ≤ p < 0.05 (slightly significant) and ns p ≥ 0.05 (not significant), indicating no statistical difference between the compared groups.
slightly significantP < 0.051.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Depletion of FANCA or FANCD2 led to a slightly significant ( P < 0.05) increased frequency of cells with nucleoli presenting γ-H2AX foci, a widely accepted readout of the presence of DNA breaks, in association with the induction of rDNA rearrangements as determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis ( Fig. 2, C and D ).
slightly significantP < 0.051.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Nevertheless, neutral tests detected slightly significant negative values of Tajima's D and Fu's F S for southwestern populations ( D = −0.1273, P < 0.05; F S = −3.166, P < 0.1; Table 5 ) and western populations ( D = −1.281, P < 0.1; F S = −0.585, P < 0.1; Table 5 ) of C. hendersonii , and the newly derived haplotypes (clade 1) were mainly found in these populations ( Figures 1B, D ), indicating that the expansion model might be applicable.