“slightly significant”

Finally, we found a slightly significant difference in TAS2R43 expression between GCs and CCs ( p ≤ 0.05).

aureus in the film containing 0.2 wt% OE, whereas, a slightly significant decrease ( p < 0.05) was observed for E.coli in the same formulation.

No concentration-dependent effect of NAC was noted, except in the case of IL-1b, where a slightly significant difference was found between 20 mM and 30 mM (p<0.05) ( Figure 9D ).

Moreover, slightly significant positive correlation was found between chest wall muscle area and body mass index (BMI) ( r = 0.255, p < 0.05).

Concerning PH, resulting from the two-way ANOVA, a highly significant effect of “genotype” ( p <0.001) and a slightly significant effect of “treatment” ( p <0.05) was observed, while the interaction term “genotype*treatment” was not statistically significant ( p >0.05) ( Table 6 ).

When compared to the infected control, the low dose of the test formulation showed a non-significant reduction in the percentage of nephrotic cells and a slightly significant ( P <0.05) reduction of degenerative cells.

The only difference between age groups was a slightly significant increase of grade ≥3 AE (28% vs. 39%, p < 0.05) for the oldest group (mainly skin reactions, treatment secondary malignancies and renal and urinary disorders).

At a dose of 5% (v/v), the juice showed a slightly significant ( P < 0.05) effect affect after 72 h; however, there was no significant effect at 48 h.

From echocardiographic indices, LVEF and LVSD revealed slightly significant ( p < 0.05) differences between IHF LR and IHF HR .

No significant differences were found between the scanned-milled mock-ups and the original 3D project except for the CCw measuerement where a slightly significant reduction was found ( p > 0.05) (Table 2 ).

At 5 days of culture a slightly significant increase of cellular viability ( P < 0.05) was detected for cells in G-A-PAA matrix as compared to the control biohybrid, while at 7 days after seeding the viability difference between these bioconstructs was found significantly higher ( P < 0.001). 3.3.5.

The localization effect on the MAR index was slightly significant (p < 0.05) due to the lower MAR index values for the lakes of La Marlette.

The overall temperature effect though, was still slightly significant ( p < 0.05, F 3,32 = 4.370).

The correlation between the acute post-PCI delta change in the plasma level of sST2 (∆) and the mean value of MGS is modest and slightly significant (r = 0.45, p = 0.05).

However, when this information was stratified by gender, the results showed, in a slightly significant way, that women within the control group spent more hours than those in the case group (116.4 vs. 101.1; p = 0.05).

It was observed that although a significant mean reduction in PI was observed in both groups individually, group comparison did reveal slightly significant overall reduction with group A ( P < 0.05).

Although DLIR were clearer as the strength level, slice thickness, and radiation dose increased, there was a slightly significant difference in scan type ( P >0.05). 3.3 Image noise In general, as the strength level decreased and the radiation dose increased, the noise level decreased while the peak frequency of the NPS curve increased ( Figures 7 , 8 ).

A slightly significant correlation was found only between presence of lipid accumulation demonstrated by light and electron microscopy (Pearson test 0.39; p<0.05).

On the other hand, Fas/PL-Lipo P407/HPMC gel showed a slightly significant apparent increase in particle size and PdI by the end of the study period (p < 0.05).

Interestingly, in this cluster for occasional grandparental childcare propensity, the marginal effect on having a first birth turns positive and slightly significant ( p < .05): that is, on average, the propensity of the grandparents to provide occasional childcare leads to a change in the probability of their adult children having a first birth that is equal to .1.

∗∗∗A highly significant, ∗∗moderately significant, and ∗∗slightly significant difference (P < 0.05) linked to the regulator was considered as examined by one-way ANOVA.

After five days, the difference between the two groups was slightly significant (29.13±2.90 vs. 26.29±4.64, p=0. 050).

Gender showed slightly significant negative coefficients ( p < 0.05*).

Of note, slightly significant reduction of cell viability for A-375 was measured only for SL (50 μg/mL, 96.5 ± 2.6% and 100 μg/mL, 94.8 ± 3.3%, both p < 0.05).

Similarly, the bivariate correlation between Snail’s walk and the calculation speed ability appears to be slightly significant ( r = −0.24; P < 0.05); eliminating age, the correlation appears strongly significant ( r = −0.31; P < 0.01).