Barely Significant
← all phrases

“showed a trend”

53,323 sentences · 53,323 papers · 65,371 search hits before verification

In the literature

showed a trendP = 0.3907.8× alpha
3 A) showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing with the Pro concentration, and it reached the extreme value at 0.9 mmol/L of Pro ( P = 0.390).
showed a trendp = 0.3917.8× alpha
In the present study, we analysed CD36 by IHC in TMAs from tumour specimens obtained during cystectomy and found that CD36 immunopositivity was significantly associated with greater depth of tumour invasion (pT3b-pT4 stage) and showed a trend toward association with greater lymph node involvement (pN stage) ( p = 0.391), both of which are well-known markers of poor prognosis in MIBC [ 38 ].
showed a trendp = 0.3988.0× alpha
Patients were further divided into two groups according to whether they had diabetes, and the predictive effect of severe stress hyperglycemia on END was significant only for diabetic patients ( OR , 3.05; 95% CI , 1.29–7.21; p = 0.011), and showed a trend for predicting END in non-diabetic patients ( OR , 1.32; 95% CI , 0.694–2.509; p = 0.398).
showed a trendp = 0.48.0× alpha
Stroke rates were similar in the aortic, femoral, and innominate groups; however, the axillary cannulation site showed a trend toward fewer stroke events (3.6 vs. 12% for direct aortic cannulation, 12.5% for femoral cannulation, 10,5% innominate cannulation, p = 0.4).
showed a trendp=0.408.0× alpha
After the VV and the HV stimulation, patients showed a trend of bearing more weight on their paretic side compared to the no stimulation condition-left hemiplegic group: 51.6%±11.3% (p=0.40) in the VV stimulation condition, 50.8%±12.1% (p=0.70) in the HV stimulation condition; right hemiplegic group: 53.8%±9.6% (p=0.19) in the VV stimulation condition, 55.7%±7.2% (p=0.20) in the HV stimulation condition ( Table 3 ).
showed a trendp = .48.0× alpha
Furthermore, although not statistically significant, patients in the high apoE group showed a trend of younger onset age (31.1 ± 19.1 vs. 34.9 ± 14.0 years old, p = .4), higher MAP (106.8 ± 15.1 vs. 101.7 ± 15.6 mmHg, p = .4), higher Upro [ln(Upro): 1.0 ± 0.9 vs. 0.8 ± 1.2 g/24 hr, p = .5], and higher TG levels [ln(TG): 1.1 ± 0.5 vs. 0.9 ± 0.6 mmol/L, p = .2] compared with patients in the low apoE group.