showed a trendp = 0.062
DLco showed a trend toward improvement (−4.34 vs. +0.79% predicted; p = 0.062), while 6MWD significantly improved (−15.9 vs. +14.2 m; p = 0.024).
DLco showed a trend toward improvement (−4.34 vs. +0.79% predicted; p = 0.062), while 6MWD significantly improved (−15.9 vs. +14.2 m; p = 0.024).
ΔRBI also showed a trend towards an inverse association with chair-stand time (β = – 0.212, p = 0.062).
Clinical Outcomes According to BMI Trajectory Among the patients discharged alive, ICU LOS showed a trend toward difference among the groups ( p = 0.062), with the longest stay observed in the increase group (17.5 [11.0–29.2] days), followed by the stable (15.5 [11.0–30.0] days) and decrease (12.0 [9.8–16.2] days) groups ( Table 2 ).
Repeating this analysis with CD4+ T-cell count and the number of escape events showed a trend toward a negative association (multiple linear regression: two-tailed p = 0.062, gradient = −23).
IL-8 showed a trend of a one-half log decrease at 6 h for the low-dose arm compared with placebo (mean difference: −0.536; p=0.062) ( figure 4b ).
Methylation of ccRCCs was not statistically associated with sex, age and lymph node metastasis status but showed a trend for the tumour diameter ( P =0.062). mir-124-3 methylation is associated with worse recurrence-free survival of patients To assess whether mir-124-3 methylation is associated with the clinical course of patients with ccRCC, we first performed a Cox regression analysis using a statistically calculated optimum cutoff value corresponding to a relative methylation level of 0.0015 for dichotomization of patients ( Figure 4B ).
Metformin increased the expression of GSH and SOD1 ( Figures 3 C and S3 A), decreased ROS and NNT ( Figures 3 A and 3D), and showed a trend toward increased MnSOD ( Figure 3 E; p = 0.062) in cells from O subjects.
A post-hoc analysis revealed that the rejection rate for the unfair proposals with a high stake size was lower than that for the unfair proposals with a low stake size in the human condition ( p = 0.012), whereas this difference only showed a trend toward significance in the computer condition ( p = 0.062).
Of note, the grooming network’s reciprocity showed a trend (p = 0.062) to be significantly higher than expected by chance compared to random networks of the same size and density.
The CG showed a trend in knowledge improvements ( p = 0.062) and a significant carbohydrate reduction at the end of the study.
Patients harboring NRAS mutations also showed a trend towards unfavorable LSS ( p = 0.062, q = 0.187, log rank test; Fig. 3e ).
Furthermore, the average stance duration showed a trend toward increase from 315.38 ms in the no-suit condition to 324.64 ms in the BEST condition, corresponding to an increase of 2.9% (two-sided paired t-test, p = 0.062).
Short dental implants (length ≤ 6 mm) showed a trend toward a lower implants’ survival compared to standard length dental implants (length > 6 mm, 86.7% vs. 90.2%, p = 0.062).
The left PV reconnection group showed a trend toward a greater increase in signal‐averaged PWD at the repeat procedure ( p = .062). 3.3.
Multivariate models controlling for gender showed a trend-level effect of group in Glu (F=2.9, p=.062), but not in Glx.
We also reported that a lower T reg expression at baseline showed a trend to longer survival in both groups (arm A + arm B: p = 0.062) (arm C DL1-3 and DL0: p = 0.088) (Figure 2E–2F ).
The PWS-UPD group mobilized significantly fewer AUs from the Sadness pattern than the TD-CA group ( z = 2.534, p = .011) and showed a trend towards fewer than the TD-DA group ( z = 1.864, p = .062).
Kaplan–Meier plots and log-rank tests revealed that CRC patients with above-median (> 6.9%, N = 12) percentage of circulating T reg showed a trend towards shorter DFS compared to CRC patients with below-median ( N = 13) percentage ( P = 0.062) (Fig. 3 a), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.551 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.921–7.069, P = 0.072).
In controls, the left hand motor cortex showed a trend ( rho = − 0.683, p = 0.062), and left leg motor cortex revealed a significant negative correlation with the BBT score ( rho = − 0.874, p = 0.005).
However, SLE males showed a trend toward increased levels ( P = 0.062), whereas SLE females were not different than controls ( P = 0.765) ( Figure 1B ). sCD14 Positively Correlates With SELENA-SLEDAI Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) is a modified version of the measure of disease activity, which is used as a clinical index for the severity of the disease ( 25 , 26 ).
[Note, there was a statistical trend for moderation of this decline by insight into the subjective nature of binocular rivalry ( t [20] = 1.98, P = 0.062), with a significant decline in decoding accuracy only among participants who were aware of the subjective nature of perceived color changes ( M = −2.30, SD = 2.53, t [10] = −3.02, P = 0.013) but not unaware participants ( M = 0.49, SD = 3.94, t [10] = 0.42, P = 0.687; see below for further exploration of this factor).] During extinction runs, decoding accuracy showed a trend-wise decrease compared with baseline ( M = −1.97%, SD = 4.96, t [21] = −1.86, P = 0.077, two-sided).
The VEGFR2 epithelial cell H-score for samples that were positive for VEGFR2 in the vasculature showed a trend for being higher than those with negative immunoreactivity status ( P = 0.062), indicating a positive association between the expression of VEGFR2 in the prostatic epithelial cells and the vasculature.
However, in paired t -tests of View Sad and Reappraise ratings separated by group, HC children showed a trend toward more positive ratings for Reappraise than View Sad trials, t (25) = 1.95, p = 0.062, while MDD-ever children showed no difference in ratings by trial type, t (17) = 0.11, p = 0.914.
Difference in beta power only showed a trend toward increased suppression (mean difference 1.41%, SEM = 1.07%, p = 0.062, one-sided).
In a subanalysis comparing PCI with Spider-EPDs showed a trend towards lower risk of death in the device group vs. no-EPDs (2.1% vs. 7.8%, HR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.06–1.07, p = 0.062).