“showed a trend”

24.22 ± 0.67 g, p = 0.29) but showed a trend for a lower lean mass (19.92 ± 0.20 g vs. 18.84 ± 0.46 g, p = 0.06).

Only the length of need for oxygen supply was significant ( p = 0.003), while the timing of full oral nutrition showed a trend to significance ( p = 0.06).

Postoperatively, arteriolar dilation showed a trend towards an increase in the patients’ ipsilateral eyes (median 1.0% versus 1.6%, p = 0.06, Wilcoxon signed‐rank test, Fig. 1 ), but remained unchanged in the patients' contralateral eyes, and at follow‐up in the eyes of the controls.

4 H) and showed a trend toward higher expression in EOLCC samples in the GSE41258 dataset ( P = 0.06) (Fig. 4 I).

Interestingly, the NH group showed a trend towards increased anti-inflammatory IL-2 ( P = 0.060) and decreased pro-inflammatory TNF-α ( P = 0.083) compared to the control group.

Treatment also influenced the difference between HR3 and HR2 ( p < 0.05) and showed a trend for HR3 and the difference between HR3 and HR1 ( p < 0.06).

Regarding Clec7a expression, exposures of 10 μM metformin or 10 μM empagliflozin also showed a trend towards increased Clec7a expression ( Figure 6 D) at 24-h (2.33-fold, p = 0.06; 2.23-fold, p = 0.08), respectively.

RFIP-nha WT showed a trend in AIM2 upregulation (p = 0.06).

Age showed a trend to an independent prognostic factor as well (p = 0.06): Fig 4 .

Postoperative RT only showed a trend toward a worse LRRFS than CCRT (HR, 6.15; 95% CI, 0.92–41.13; p = 0.06, Table 3 ).

The DVT group showed a trend towards higher prevalence of hypercholesterolemia (43.6% vs. 30.9%), with marginal significance ( P = 0.060).

No other significant associations with increased PET uptake were identified in the univariate analysis, although the presence of fatty lesions on MRI showed a trend towards an association (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1–9, p = 0.06).

Furthermore, the proportion of participants with a $10% decrease in average lesion area was significantly higher in the CPA group than the placebo group at weeks 3 ( P =0.05) and 6 ( P =0.02), and showed a trend at week 12 ( P =0.06).

Analyses of the MALQOM scores in a subset of patients (n = 30) showed a trend towards a correlation with sensory thresholds in the fingertips (correlation co-efficient r s = −0.342, p = 0.06), but no relationship to thresholds on the hand or dorsum.

Among the tested biomarkers, only high serum Tau level showed a trend ( p = 0.060, using the first quartile cut-off) towards an association with prognostic in univariate analysis (Fig. 3 ).

48%, OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.21–4.72, p = 0.01) and showed a trend of more sensitization to furred animals (54% vs. 38%, OR 1.90, 95% CI 0.98–3.70, p = 0.06).

Pre-DDAVP VWF showed a trend towards lower levels in excellent responders (Ag: P =0.06, Act: P =0.07).

The CSHQ total score and in-person vocabulary task results showed a trend towards an association ( r = −0.28, p = 0.06).

Piriform cortical single-units in Tg2576 mice showed a trend toward increased baseline firing at all ages compared to single-units in WT mice ( F (1,207) = 3.45, p = 0.06) ( Fig. 1A ).

Myc overexpression showed a trend towards significant correlation with OIII grade and presence of MVP in univariate analysis (p = 0.06 for both data).

Moreover, the players harbouring a copy of the C allele showed a trend toward higher MRS than players carriers of the TT genotype (CC + CT = 32.9 ± 1.5 km h -1 TT = 31.5 ± 1.9 km h -1 p = 0.06).

FAZ area was significantly larger in the T+M group than in controls ( P = 0.01) and showed a trend toward enlargement compared to the T group ( P = 0.06).

The template-defined method showed a trend positive relationship with reality distortion symptoms (r = .45, p = .06) and the manual tracing method showed a significant positive relationship (r = .47, p = .05).

Subgroup analyses showed a trend toward efficacy for the RCT (lumateperone) on response rate (RR = 1.32, p = 0.06), while post-hoc analyses demonstrated significant benefit (RR = 1.35, p < 0.001; Supplementary Figure 11 ).

Compression garment discontinuation showed a trend toward improvement with scar release (52% vs. 42%, p = 0.06) ( Figure 5 ). 3.6.