“only marginally significant”

Only marginally significant differences ( p < .10) were observed in two of the manga conditions (small change and relapse prevention) and the narrative and general text conditions.

We found the path to be only marginally significant (standardized weight: −.046, t = −1.8, p < .1).

Elevation interacted significantly with living status for beech only, and almost doubled the difference between living and dead trees, whereas for pine, the effects were only marginally significant (p<0.1), though high in magnitude.

Concentrations of C and N in soil and microbial biomass In the mixed heath soil, the concentrations of NH + 4 , NO − 3 , DOC, and DON in the soil mesocosms were 43–67% lower than the concentrations in the control mesocosms, although the difference for NH + 4 was only marginally significant (0.05 < P < 0.1, Tukey's HSD; Table 3 ).

The possible explanation for why the difference in the improvement of moral imagination between paper-based and AR-based simulations is only marginally significant, or at a level of p < 10%, is because this study does not distinguish between the learning styles of the participants.

For Black women, the relative risk ratio is similar to other groups (RR = 1.078 95% CI: 0.992–1.172) but only marginally significant ( p < .10).

All the autoregressive paths were significant, except for the autoregressive stability path for sleep from T1 to T2 that was only marginally significant (Beta = 0.12, SE = 0.07, p < 0.10) (see Table 2 and Fig. 2 ), indicating that deviations from the individual average score in a factor were always related to an unexpected change in the same factor at the following timepoint.

Overall, 43% of the sample reported shifting within these payment categories over the study period, but these changes were only marginally significant ( p = 0.1).

Students majoring in engineering/physics were also found to have lower perceptions of caring but the effect was only marginally significant (β = −0.103, p < 0.10).

The difference between White men and Asian women is only marginally significant (OR = 2.61, p < .10).

Participants in the high-worry group selected the increasing option less often than expected by chance, although the difference was only marginally significant, t (27) = −1.95, p < 0.10.

Results Statistical Testing The linear age trend was only marginally significant (Δχ 2 = 2.68, Δ df = 1; p = .10).

Qualitatively similar patterns in confidence hold for the comparison of the High Load – Easy and High Load – Hard conditions, although in this case the Accuracy x WM Demand interaction was only marginally significant [F(1,49) = 2.75, P = 0.1].

There were no interactions of temperature and nutrient level except chl a -W and flux of NO 3 − -N, but the latter was only marginally significant ( p < 0.1).

Susceptible Progeny of 3167 Show a Level Of Disease Intermediate Between Surviving Progeny and Susceptible Unrelated Animals We compared various survival, parasitological and pyrexic measurements from the susceptible progeny of 3167 with those from the unrelated susceptible animals ( Table 4 ).There were several parameters that were significantly different between the susceptible first-generation progeny and unrelated animals, whereas other parameters, especially those related with time to detection of onset, were only marginally significant (0.05≤p≤ 0.10) or not significant.

Child marriage was also found to be associated with lower cognitive scores for men ( β = −0.11, p < .01) in Model 1; but was only marginally significant in Model 2 ( β = −0.07, p < .1).

Although only marginally significant ( p < 0.10), there was a slight increase in likelihood of being diagnosed if the customer reported living near a clinic (OR = 1.558; 95 % CI 0.999-2.430).

These results are, however, only marginally significant at p -value < 10%.

aBMD in the lumbar spine and trabecular vBMD in the L 3 vertebra was lower in the “high HOMA-IR” group, but the differences were only marginally significant ( p < 0.1).

In the context of the other variables, the observed sharing with the peer was only marginally significant ( β = −.14, p < .10), while being a boy ( β = .19) and parent‐rated prosocial behavior at 2.5–3 years ( β = −.23) remained significant predictors of uncaring traits, F (5, 167) = 5.22, p < .001, adjusted R 2 = .11.

As in this model, the coefficients of nPow to using contacts were only marginally significant (i.e., at p < 0.10), we also examined a model (model 3) restricting these two coefficients to zero.

Heterozygosity excess was significant (p<0.05) for the Wilcoxon test in all cases, except for the Western Cantabrian subpopulation without migrants, for which it was only marginally significant (p<0.1).

In Danish respondents, having favourable health behaviours was linked negatively to attitudes toward the product, but this was only marginally significant at p < .10 (Table 4 ).

However, the strength of this association was reduced and only marginally significant ( p < 0.10) when preference for the equity principle, gender, and academic unit were added to the equation.

Interestingly, the estimated coefficients are not statistically significant or are only marginally significant ( p < 0.1) in a few cases.