MTTLMD was significant at the ASV level ( P <0.05) and only marginally significant at the genus or family levels ( P <0.1).
← all phrases
“only marginally significant”
Sighted at
p<1.0p=0.9
In the literature
However, the large standard error in 1990 makes the Wald test for the difference only marginally significant (p < .10) (Census Bureau privacy rules prevent disclosure of the actual coefficients).
The results presented in Table 5 suggest that individuals feeling endangered by COVID-19 were about 25% more likely to comply with face-covering measures, but this estimate is only marginally significant ( p < 0.10).
Lastly, the propensity to switch to an alternative mapping following negative feedback was higher under reliability (20%, SEM =2%) than unreliability conditions (14%, SEM =3%), although the difference was only marginally significant ( t (14)=2, p <0.1). 3.2.1.2 Experiment 2 – effect of reliability instructions on initial acquisition Comparing performance in blocks with objectively identical feedback reliability but differing instructions, we found no reliable difference in accuracy between reliability-instruction blocks (86%, SEM =1%) than unreliability-instructed blocks (80%, SEM =4%; t (14)=1.28, p =0.22).
In the case of the CO 2 experiment, a t-test conducted at the final harvest revealed that the actual shoot dry mass for the two treatments was only marginally significant (P = 0.10).
β-caryophyllene showed a similar decrease (36.4%), although the decrease was only marginally significant ( F 1,7 = 3.56, P = 0.10).
Model 5 and Model 6 in Table 3 suggested that the effect of JI on task proactivity was only marginally significant ( β = −0.095, p < 0.1); the effect of obsessive (harmonious) passion on task proactivity was significant ( β = 0. 428, p < 0.001; β = 0.286, p < 0.001).
When these two groups were compared, the age effect on the adaptive shifts was only marginally significant, -41.8° vs. −22.5°, F (1,18) = 3.9, p <.1.
Another nine (7%) analyses were only marginally significant (i.e., p < .10) in the expected direction.
(OR = 6.17, P<0.05) In addition, the odds of misclassification increased by 1.04 times for each one-year increase in mothers’ age, but this was only marginally significant (p<0.10).
Conservation) was only marginally significant ( p < 0.1, t = 1.7).
The possible explanation for why the difference in the improvement of moral imagination between paper-based and AR-based simulations is only marginally significant, or at a level of p < 10%, is because this study does not distinguish between the learning styles of the participants.
The study had a relatively small sample size and may have been underpowered, several effects were only marginally significant ( p < 0.10), and the physiological changes emerged during a brief 15-min interaction and began returning toward baseline by the end of the session.
For Td , the only periopathogen that exhibited an increase throughout the observation period, the differences were only marginally significant (P<0.1) ( Table IV ).
The estimate for Openness was only marginally significant ( p < .10).
112.3 ± 7.0 mm 3 , but the difference was only marginally significant ( F 1,23 = 2.89, p = .10).
Additional analysis switching the reference group for race ( Supplementary Table S3 ) suggested that this effect of proportion kin tended to be positive but only marginally significant for non-White adults ( p < .10).
However, this response was only significant for juvenile survival of the P-lines on tomato, all other responses were only marginally significant ( P < 0.1 in all cases, Table 1 ).
However, post-2010, high exposure was associated with an 11% higher risk of child mortality, although this association was only marginally significant (OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.99–1.24; p- value < 0.10).
This benefit persisted at 3-months post intervention but was only marginally significant [ F (1, 85) = 2.77, p = 0.10].
Spring snow addition had increased soil moisture by 6.4% in 2011 ( P = 0.04), 9.2% in 2012 ( P < 0.001), while the increase was only marginally significant in 2013 (by 3.0%, P = 0.10) ( Fig. 2d–f , Table 1 ).
Further model tests showed that the motivational predictors ‘meat’ and ‘peace’ were not statistically significant, whilst the predictor ‘challenge’ was only marginally significant ( p < 0.1).
We found the path to be only marginally significant (standardized weight: −.046, t = −1.8, p < .1).
Biomass allocation to the leader shoot (developed during the year of the experiment) was higher in the straight-type plants compared with the crooked-type ones in both treatments, although differences were only marginally significant ( P <0.10) ( Fig. 4B ).
Not knowing husbands’ fertility preferences was also associated with increased odds of using covertly, compared to perceiving that husbands wanted the same or fewer children in all countries except Zambia, with ORs ranging from 2.21 (95 percent CI 1.24–3.92) in Ethiopia to 3.96 (95 percent CI 2.28–6.86) in Kenya, although the associations were only marginally significant (p < 0.10) in Nigeria and Mali.