“only marginally significant”

While the prevalence of HR HPV among patients not receiving HAART linearly increased with each decrease in CD4 count category (CD4 <200; CD4 200–349; CD4 350–499; and CD4≥500; PR for linear trend 5.03, p=0.025), this trend was only marginally significant among women receiving HAART for <2 years (prevalence ratio (PR) for linear trend 2.98, p=0.084) and insignificant for women on HAART therapy for ≥2 years (PR for linear trend 1.19, p=0.275).

In an analogous model, IEAA is only marginally significant (p=0.084, Table 2 ).

1 ), the AOA abundance in the LS stand was 58% higher than that in the ES stand, although the difference was only marginally significant ( P = 0.085, Table 1 ).

4b ), but the discrimination between familiar and unknown places, considering the 24 place-responsive neurons, was only marginally significant (54%, p = 0.085; permutation test; Fig. 4c ).

Finally, a two-way ANOVA including response type (distance) and numerical value was also conducted on the accuracy rates data, revealing a trend for an interaction in the hypothesized direction (see Fig 1B ), however this interaction was only marginally significant, F(1, 31) = 3.18, p = .085, η 2 p = .09.

Scores for overall level of stigma and enacted stigma increased significantly with stage of podoconiosis while the association observed in relation to felt stigma was only marginally significant (p = 0.085).

The Persistence factor, which weights willingness-to-wait in the high persistence condition most heavily, was only marginally significant ( p = 0.085).

Likewise, when individual ages within the younger cohort were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test, the result was only marginally significant ( p = 0.085), suggesting a progressive rather than distinctly segmented decrease.

The difference in cognitive e mpathy between conditions was only marginally significant, thus failing to fully support H1b (MPT: M = 1.47, SD = 1.25; Comparison: M = 1.26, SD = 1.42, t (299) = 1.38, P = 0.085, 95% CI: [−0.515, 0.092], d = 0.16) (Fig. 4 ).

( 2014 ), although the difference in the proportion of high and low working memory capacity subjects between the studies was only marginally significant (cut-off digit span = 17.4; chi(1) = 2.967, p = 0.085).

In the whole group, the MMP2 rs7201 C variant conferred an increased risk of locoregional recurrence ( p log-rank = 0.025, HR 1.55, p = 0.037; Figure 1 I), while the association of TIMP2 rs7501477 T allele with poor LRFS was only marginally significant ( p log-rank = 0.068, HR 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95–2.07, p = 0.085.

However, females tended to have a higher growth rate after cutting, although the interaction between cutting and gender was only marginally significant ( P = 0.085; Table 3 and Supplementary Table S2 ).

The interaction reflected a significant trial type effect for CSI 300 ms trials ( M = 435.55, SD = 98.94 for single-task, and M = 473.44, SD = 130.29 for non-switch trials, p < 0.001), and CSI 800 ms trials ( M = 389.98, SD = 35.14 for single-task, and M = 410.92, SD = 64.37 for non-switch trials, p = 0.02), whereas the difference between trial types was only marginally significant for CSI 600 ms trials ( M = 417.74, SD = 58.60 for single-task, and M = 433.45, SD = 85.01 for non-switch trials, p = 0.085).

We also find more target looking in the reduced, repetition trials compared to the reduced, no-repetition trials, although this difference is only marginally significant in the current sample (β = 0.57, SE = 0.33, p = 0.085).

The pattern was reversed for the number of soft taxa, but while the sex differences were maintained ( F 1 = 5.214, p = 0.0230), the differences between the source and treatment islet populations was only marginally significant ( F 1 = 4.327, p = 0.0852).

Only Northern Channel Islands met all three criteria (Figure 4 ; Appendix S3 : Tables S2 and S3 ); however, the targeted and non‐targeted interaction was only marginally significant ( n = 34, p = 0.0855).

After the end of the main harvest in 2020, pregnant women in the treatment households more often felt less stressed than those in the control group, but this difference was only marginally significant for the month of January 2021 ( p = 0.086).

Although the interaction between L2 proficiency and Condition was only marginally significant (the effect of L2 proficiency on the T2-T4 contrast vs. the T2-T3 contrast: β = −0.70, SE = 0.41, t = −1.72, p = 0.086), we nevertheless conducted post hoc pairwise comparisons because it was directly relevant to the aims of the present study.

Multivariable Poisson regression with robust error variances revealed that females were approximately 2-times more likely to have had a self-reported needle-stick injury in the past compared to males (IR=1.95, CI: 0.91–4.18); however, this difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.086).

DNA fragmentation was also reduced, but it was only marginally significant ( Figure 2(c) , P = 0.086).

While we found that the Ave-DAT (putamen) of the SN + PD group was lower than that of the SN − PD group, the corresponding p -value was only marginally significant ( p = 0.086).

In this model, the contribution of social anxiety was also positive but only marginally significant (β = 0.20, t = 1.73, p = 0.086), whereas ASD symptoms did no longer explain a significant proportion of the variance in SM symptomatology (β = 0.07, t = 1.09, p = 0.278).

Although this difference was only marginally significant, t (53) = 1 . 751, p = 0 . 086, the effect size was moderate ( d = 0 . 503), comparable to the change observed with sensory feedback.

However, the two-way interaction between proximity and object membership was only marginally significant, F (1, 39) = 3.10, p = .086, η p 2 = .07.

All of the study’s main effects and interactions remained significant, apart from the interaction between student PLE and teacher school context efficacy on average class general distress that became only marginally significant with the inclusion of student gender as a covariate (B = −0.009, SE = 0.005, p = 0.086). 4.