Likelihood ratio tests indicated that the effect of temperature was only marginally significant during the time before sunrise (χ 2 = 3.02, P = 0.083) and not significant during the time after sunset (χ 2 = 2.63, P = 0.104).
← all phrases
“only marginally significant”
Sighted at
p<1.0p=0.9
In the literature
However, our PERMANOVA results indicated that the anatomical phenotype root-cross section area (RXSA) was only marginally significant to the rhizosphere beta diversity ( P = 0.083, F 1,5 = 1.65; R 2 = 0.29) of the grassland mixture.
However, the difference between the high and low probability location was only marginally significant, t (23) = 1.81, p = .083, d = 0.27.
Reading speed was on average slower in the children categorized as having OMD (DEM Type 2 and 4 groups, n = 8) relative to the children categorized as having normal oculomotor function (DEM Type 1 group, n = 9), but this difference was only marginally significant ( t (9.54) = −1.5, p = 0.083, 1-tailed, see Figure 5 a).
A lower proportion of women had virologic failure (67 vs 77 %), but this was only marginally significant (p = 0.083).
It is noteworthy that snow depth and calf recruitment were negatively correlated in three time windows, though only marginally significant so (January–March: P = 0.083, February–April: P = 0.068, March–May: P = 0.067). 4 DISCUSSION Understanding the drivers of animal demographics and population size is essential in wildlife management and conservation.
On the other two data sets, the signature achieves much higher accuracy (> 75%) than that of coin-flipping but only marginally significant ( p -value = 0.083 and 0.107).
The second axis (RDA 2) was only marginally significant ( F = 4.14; p = .083) and driven by the mean diurnal range (BIO2) and annual precipitation (BIO12) (Table 3 ).
Overall warming increased ER by 12%, but the effect was only marginally significant ( p = 0.083).
For irreversible bending rate, on the other hand, because of much greater variation in the data a difference between hardwoods and softwoods was only marginally significant (mean for hardwoods 2.30 ± 0.286 % per h and for softwoods 1.13 ± 0.083; 1-way ANOVA, F 1,197 = 3.0343, P = 0.0831).
Although the main effect of Time was highly significant ( F = 100.403, p < 0.001), the main effect of Group was only marginally significant ( p = 0.084).
Women also showed somewhat more “concern for colleagues”, but this difference was only marginally significant ( p = .084). 2 Discussion This study aimed to examine how gender is related with sickness presenteeism and reasons behind.
The relationship between seed viability and seed production across the treatment level was positive, but only marginally significant ( X 2 = 2.9, p = 0.084).
The effect of this interaction on promotion-serving support was only marginally significant (Table 4 in Appendix, Model 7, b = .13, p = .084).
The following two pairs were only marginally significant: 18–34 years compared with 55 years and above ( P = 0.084) and 35–54 years compared with 55 years and above ( P = 0.084).
Regarding FoP, only marginally significant differences between patients (M = 30.81, SD = 7.53) and their spouses occurred [M = 34.29, SD = 9.39; t (20) = −1.82, P = 0.084].
The ROI analyses based on the four-group model (all subgroups of EB and LB) revealed only marginally significant Group × Training effect on BOLD signal changes in the left precuneus (F 3,21 = 2.556, P = 0.084, ƞ 2 = 0.277).
Conversely, the frequency of efficacy posts was the lowest in the initial phase (65%), as compared with the pre-crisis (82%) and the maintenance (100%) phase, though the differences were only marginally significant ( χ 2 = 4.94, p = 0.084).
In a separate greenhouse study, fungicide reduced total biomass by ∼10%, but this effect was only marginally significant ( P = 0.084; Table S1A ; Fig.
However, this difference was only marginally significant (t(19) = 1.82, p = 0.084).
Regarding mean scores for the “Perceived susceptibility” subscale, only marginally significant differences were found by education ( P = 0.084).
The time*evaluation order was only marginally significant ( F (1,62) = 3.079, p <.084, η 2 p = 0.047).
Mann-Whitney tests also showed a significant difference between the 3D Head and 3D Plant (Mann-Whitney U = 1258.5, p = .016) but the difference between the 3D Head and 2D Head was only marginally significant (Mann-Whitney U = 1269, p = .084).
high = 0.24, p = 0.116), but the difference was only marginally significant ( z -value Δ = 1.38, p = 0.084).
Our segmentation had suggested that, at a group level, pro-cue switch and cue task-stay trials could be distinguished on the basis of these two topographies, however the fitting result suggested that this was, at best, only marginally significant at a within-subject level [F(1,13) = 3.489, p = 0.084].