“only marginally significant”

Although only marginally significant, wing loading ( F 1,24 = 3.447, p = .076) and aspect ratio ( F 1,24 = 3.956, p = .058) tended to be higher in the spring forms (Table 1 ).

Numerically, the increase was stronger with high-pass than low-pass filtering, but the difference between central filter types was only marginally significant ( t (99) = 1.79, p = .076, d = 0.02).

After adjustment for transplant characteristics and parameters related to renal function, the association remained significant for Camões’ (regression coefficient: 17.418; 95% CI: 4.484–30.352; p = 0.007) and modified Fung’s (regression coefficient: 13.708; 95% CI: 1.003–26.414; p = 0.033) but only marginally significant for Fung’s (regression coefficient: 12.124; 95% CI: −1.126 to 25.375; p = 0.077). 4.

For splice variant Snap25b , we also detected only marginally significant downregulation of this transcript in the HP group compared to the LP group ( p = 0.077).

Patients without BED had significantly fewer FA symptoms (3.76) than patients with subthreshold BED (5.27) and BED (6.42), while the difference between patients with subthreshold BED and BED was only marginally significant ( p = 0.077).

When the AL and CR rats were considered together, we found negative associations between the liver protein mass and Δ 15 N levels in the urine and plasma proteins (−0.65 ≤ R ≤ −0.35), and on the contrary, positive associations were found between the muscle protein mass and Δ 15 N levels that were highly significant ( p < 0.01) in cardiac and gastrocnemius muscles (0.40 ≤ R ≤ 0.62), but were only marginally significant in the soleus muscle ( R = 0.27, p = 0.077) ( Figure 2 ). δ 15 N was also measured for 11 transaminating (Ala, Asx, Glx, Gly, Pro, Ile, Leu, and Val), non-transaminating, and indispensable (Met, Phe and Lys) AA in tissue proteins from the small intestine, plasma, heart, and the gastrocnemius muscle; Δ 15 N was calculated by subtracting the δ 15 N value of their dietary counterpart.

The effect was only marginally significant by time in seconds, t (600) = -1.77, p = .077, d = -0.14, 95% CI = [-0.30; 0.02].

Likewise, concentrations of NBFRs in floor dust collected from bedrooms were considerably higher than those from kitchens (mean: 4600 ng/g vs 1700 ng/g), although the difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.077).

Last, the executive domain declined significantly faster in APOE ε4 carriers than APOE ε3 homozygotes when adjusting for age, sex, and education (model 1, p = 0.028); however, this difference was only marginally significant when further adjusting by the CERAD NP score and Braak NFT stage (model 2, p = 0.077, 95% CI [−0.041 to 0.002]) and lost statistical significance when further adjusting by comorbid pathologies and the effect of ADNC on the slope (model 3, p = 0.135, 95% CI [−0.041 to 0.006]) likely due to insufficient power and the compounding effect of comorbid pathologies on executive function.

Attachment anxiety was negatively correlated with internalized CBs, although this correlation was only marginally significant ( r = − .23, p = .077).

The difference on rise from supine between patients receiving daily deflazacort versus daily prednisone was only marginally significant over 48 weeks (2.01 vs 3.43; -1.43; p = 0.077).

However, when examining the actual number of practices reported by the players, female teams had fewer practices than male teams, although this difference was only marginally significant (MD = 0.19, p = 0.077).

We repeated the analysis without controlling for whether the asker chose answer A as the best answer, and received similar but only marginally significant results: the estimated hazard ratio of the guilt-relief score was exp(B) = 0.90 ( B = -0.11, SE = 0.06, p = 0.077).

The proportion of drivers listed as “under drug influence” showed a positive trend, but this change was only marginally significant (b = 0.015, p = 0.077, 95% CI = (− 0.002, 0.031)).

The simple main effect of Age was only marginally significant for auditory response rates for angry face and happy voice ( F (4, 389) = 2.12, p = .077).

2 ), although the correlation was only marginally significant (Spearman correlation, r s = 0.62, p = 0.077, n = 9 species).

40) in the kelp forests than in the urchin barrens respectively, when using density data, though the differences in overall species numbers were only marginally significant (paired t test: t = 2.644, df = 3, P = 0.077).

Although the UM-B group followed the same trend, index reduction was only marginally significant ( p = 0.078) ( Table 2 ).

In contrast, in the tour boat context, when we ask subjects about John’s utility, the difference between the conditions is only marginally significant, with a small effect size (everyone acts: M = 0.88, SE = 0.032; only John acts: M = 0.96, SE = 0.020; χ 2 ( 1 ) Yates’ corrected = 3.11, P = 0.078 ; φ = 0.12 ).

saccharum ( R 2 = 23.8.1%, P = 0.102) and was only marginally significant for P. glauca ( R 2 = 14.7%, P = 0.078).

Differently than for the total sleep time, mid-sleep focused contrasts revealed that on both Monday and Wednesday the participants slept significantly less than on Sunday ( t (23) = 5.59; p < 0.001), and that they slept less on Monday than on Wednesday although this difference was only marginally significant ( t (23) = 1.84; p = 0.078).

We also found a region in the left anterior insula that showed the same interaction effect (−46, 14, −12; SV FWE-corrected; table S2B), but the only marginally significant simple effects (trust no threat > trust threat : −46, 26, 12; k = 4, P = 0.078, SV FWE-corrected; NSC no threat > NSC threat : no voxels) indicate a weaker trust-related suppression of activity compared to the TPJ.

On average, VSLA participants reported having approximately 1.5 more animals for breeding than controls, but this difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.078).

The results demonstrated that the combinatorial gRNAs P1 and XCp were more effective in suppressing intracellular HBsAg production than either gRNA alone, although the effect is only marginally significant ( P = 0.078 for combination versus P1 and P = 0.085 for combination versus XCp) ( Figure 3 ).

In general, linear terms were positive in nearly all trials, albeit only marginally significant for the trial in KS ( P = 0.078; β = 0.037), indicating selective mortality against individuals of lower DI.