“only marginally significant”

In-depth examination using partial correlation analysis, while controlling for age and generalized anxiety, indicated that anxiety and anger under gaming conditions displayed only marginally significant correlations with gaming disorder scores (mean anxiety-disorder score: r = 0.296, p = 0.075; mean anger-disorder score: r = 0.319, p = 0.054).

However, for both men and women, these differences were only marginally significant between positive and negative conditions (for men: b = 0.99, SE = 0.56, t = 1.78, p = .075, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [−1.10, 2.09] (See S3 Table in S1 File ); for women: b = −1.14, SE = 0.61, t = −1.87, p = .063, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [−2.34, 0.06] (See S4 Table in S1 File ).

For study 3, component 7 again had significant direct and indirect effects, while the total effect of rMEQ (excluding component 7) was only marginally significant (p = .075), and the direct effect (controlling for component 7) was not significant (p = .463).

Intra‐group comparisons showed no significant differences after ANOVA test between mean T1 ΔPBL and mean T2 ΔPBL in groups 2 and 3, whilst in group 1 the difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.075).

2 B; Table S3 ), but mesocosm design did affect the proportion of surviving crabs remaining in the mesocosm with more crabs remaining in the closed mesocosms, although only marginally significant (F 1,15 = 3.66, p = 0.075; Fig. 2 B; Table S3 ).

Additionally, 24h-UCa levels were significantly higher in white people compared to black people ( Table 2 ), although this racial difference was only marginally significant in patients with kidney stones (p = 0.075).

The interaction was only marginally significant for Academic Performance (F (57,1) = 3.3, p = 0.075, η 2 p = 0.055, observed power 0.43), albeit with a similar pattern, with an improvement in males and a worsening in females, which was also observed for Subjective Feelings and Leisure Activities, although it did not approach statistical significance (probably because of the small number of females).

The only marginally significant difference between those with PD and the older adults was that older adults more strongly agreed they noted balance improvements (p = 0.075).

There were only marginally significant differences in the presence of food being shown on camera [χ 2 (4, 241) = 8.49, p = 0.075], with trends toward #miarecovery showing it less and #arfidrecovery more than would be expected by chance.

However, the difference in response times between neutral and fearful faces was only marginally significant in the high predictive blocks, F (1,86) = 3.238, p = .075, η p 2 = .036, and significant in the non-predictivity blocks, F (1,86) = 8.888, p = .004, η p 2 = .094.

Post hoc tests showed that derived words elicited a larger negativity than inflected words ( p = 0.029) but there were only marginally significant differences between derived and monomorphemic words ( p = 0.075) and no reliable differences between inflected and monomorphemic words ( p = 0.268).

In contrast, the three-way interaction for RT was only marginally significant ( F (12,272) = 1.6564; p = 0.076).

The simple slope [ 74 ] of the regression of workplace friendships onto job loss insecurity under high negative gossip was only marginally significant (simple slope = −0.20, t = 1.78, p = 0.076).

In the GSE39582 cohort, the difference was only marginally significant ( Figure 5B ; P = 0.076), although the high EPSTI1 group still had a smaller infiltration abundance than the low EPSTI1 group.

Cultivar (nested in susceptibility level) explained 7.9% ( p = 0.029) of the variation, but the effect of susceptibility was only marginally significant (3.9%, p = 0.076).

Although the blood Cd levels were higher in the low eGFR group than in the normal eGFR group, the difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.076).

Differences between ranges were only marginally significant when all traits were condensed into a single PC value (PC ALL , P = 0.076).

Nevertheless, this difference was only marginally significant upon scrutiny with the chi-square test (X 2 = 53.576; df = 40; p = 0.076), implying a potential existence of differential item functioning at the difficulty parameter level for men and women.

Grazers perhaps experience higher mortality during droughts than do either browsers and mixed feeders, though this was only marginally significant, possibly due to small sample size ( F 2,4 = 5.26, p = 0.076; Figure 4 b). 4 DISCUSSION Here, we found (a) that mixed feeders changed their diet during drought to include less C4 grasses, but that drought did not induce dietary shifts in grazers and browsers.

The fertility zone effect on dwarf shrub dry mass was only marginally significant ( P = 0.076), but the trend was the same, i.e. a higher biomass in the eutrophic (47 ± 20 g m − 2 ) than oligotrophic zone (18 ± 6 g m − 2 ) with an intermediate mass in the mesotrophic zone (27 ± 5 g m − 2 ).

In the phobia‐relevant condition, this difference was only marginally significant ( t (30) = −1.84; p = 0.076; d = 0.34). 3.2.

Still, the effect of anticipation was only marginally significant ( b = .999, z = 1.78, p = .076) at the lowest point of the scale (2.31 SD below the mean or restraint score of 0), which corresponds to the most unrestrained individuals.

The pseudogenes on the neo-X showed a higher ratio of genes with female-benefit/male-detriment effects to genes with male-benefit/female-detriment effects than functional genes (16/13 [1.23] versus 29/51 [0.57], respectively), although the difference was only marginally significant ( χ 2 test: χ 2 =3.1, d.f.=1, P =0.076, Table 1 ).

gondii infection when compared to their peers; however, the difference was only marginally significant (21.9% vs. 5.6%; P = 0.076).

Although only marginally significant, wing loading ( F 1,24 = 3.447, p = .076) and aspect ratio ( F 1,24 = 3.956, p = .058) tended to be higher in the spring forms (Table 1 ).