“only marginally significant”

While the variances of genetic distances were 5.5% higher in the urban habitat when urbanization was classified based on Distance from the City Center, this difference was only marginally significant and had a small effect size ( F 1,254 = 3.250, p = 0.072, R 2 = 0.013).

1 The difference between positive and neutral content was only marginally significant ( b = −0.90 [−1.88, 0.083], SE = 0.50, t (37,358) = −1.79, P = 0.072, R 2 = 0.021).

The Wilks' Λ results showed a significant main effect of time, F (3) = 2.455, p = 0.000, η 2 p = 0.273, but the interaction between group and time was only marginally significant, F (3) = 2.455, p = 0.072, η 2 p = 0.111.

The effect of maternal sensitivity was only marginally significant, β = −0.155, S.E. = 0.086, p = 0.072, and contrary to our hypothesis, there was no main effect of infants’ mother-directed gaze, β = −0.039, S.E. = 0.09, p = 0.66.

Using a linear combination post-estimation test, we find that the comparison between the indirect and direct empathy conditions is only marginally significant ( β = .749, p = .072).

In Figure 7 A there appears to be a trend such that the congruency had a smaller effect in larger categories, suggesting that larger familiar size differences were processed more robustly and more successfully resisted interference from image size; however, this interaction was only marginally significant, F (3, 33) = 2.61, p = 0.072, η p 2 = 0.225.

A partially different profile emerged from the SDQ filled in by the fathers, for which the multivariate effect of Group was only marginally significant, F (5, 44) = 2.193, p = 0.072, η 2 = 0.200.

On the other hand, the post-RT pWL was only marginally significant to PFS in training cohort (p = 0.072, HR = 0.59[0.33–1.04]) and not significant in testing cohort (p = 0.278) under multivariable Cox regression.

In the control group, a negative correlation was observed between the power in the delta band and the total difference score in imagined memories following hypnosis (i.e., total Δ MCQ for imagined memories) at frontal region, r = −0.677, p = 0.045, and an analogous trend was observed at central and temporal regions; although, only marginally significant, r = −0.624, p = 0.072, and r = −0.626, p = 0.071, respectively.

Mass across populations was explained by SVL ( R 2 = 0.874, F 1,97 = 419.864, p < 0.001), with differences in body condition only marginally significant ( F 6,97 = 2.007, p = 0.072). 3.2 Laboratory Experiment 3.2.1 Body Size and Growth Rates Among the subset of three populations examined for latitudinal variation in reproductive characteristics and intrinsic growth rate, we found significant differences in SVL, mass, and body condition (SVL: Brown–Forsythe F 2,26 = 3.816, p = 0.035; mass: Brown–Forsythe F 2,26 = 32.866, p = 0.009; body condition: SVL, F 1,48 = 312.896, p < 0.001; and population, F 2,48 = 3.487, p = 0.039; Figure 3 ).

When both direct and indirect effects are considered, the total effect of resilience on distress is negative but only marginally significant (β = –0.081, p = 0.072), suggesting that resilience alleviates distress mainly through its positive relationship with hope rather than by a strong direct impact.

Although the ME on binge drinking was greatest among Hispanics, the relationship between MWS and binge drinking was only marginally significant relative to Whites (aOR=0.67, p =0.072), and the overall effect of the interaction was not statistically significant.

Sex also influenced HAM-D scores, with males showing a greater response than females (p = 0.018), although this trend was only marginally significant for HAM-A (p = 0.073).

The response time of congruent scenes (2588 ± 141 ms) was smaller than incongruent scenes (2631 ± 144 ms), but the difference (23 ms) was only marginally significant, F (1,23) = 3.53, p = 0.073, (see Figure 3 B).

The three‐way interaction between belief domain, belief type, and age group was only marginally significant ( χ 2 (1) = 3.22, p = 0.073), see Figure 4 .

A previous study in this site observed a small negative and only marginally significant effect ( P = 0.073) of plant diversity on yield, and this influence was driven mostly by herbicide application in barley monoculture treatment and not due to plant richness per se 39 .

While the lengths of rays 4 and 5 were significantly increased in RA-treated fish compared to control animals (t-test, Mann-Whitney respectively, p<0.05), we found only marginally significant differences in the length of ray 3 (t-test, p = 0.073).

In humans In humans, the overall combined effect size for the total set of 11 studies (406 participants) was only marginally significant, g = 0.25, 95% CI [−0.02, 0.53], p = 0.073 ( Fig. 7 ) in a heterogeneous set of studies, Q (9) = 39.57, p < 0.0001; I 2 = 74.73.

On the other hand, the difference in this probability between patients with baseline weight 59–67 kg and those >67 kg was only marginally significant (p = 0.073, log-rank test).

This effect was however only marginally significant in the overall analysis (Permanova, disturbance × oyster bed interaction: R 2 = 0.076, P = 0.073).

Planned comparisons at the 50 ms SOA condition showed that mediated priming was significantly smaller than direct priming ( p < 0.003) and was also smaller than backward priming, although the latter effect was only marginally significant ( p = 0.073).

In the adjusted analysis, the association between thyroid AEs and PFS became only marginally significant (adjusted HR, 0.370; 95% CI, 0.125–1.099; P = 0.073), while older age was not no longer a significant risk factor (Table 2 ).

For men who used the innovation, the rate ratio of AMR recalled decreased by a factor of 0.355, although this effect was only marginally significant ( P = 0.073) (see Additional file 3 : Table S4).

5 f), although the post-hoc tests were only marginally significant with the greatest fraction consumed for V. corrugata compared to R. philippinarum ( p = 0.073, Table S2).

The proportion of recapping among all cells was positively correlated with mite infestation levels (varroas), although the result was only marginally significant (ρ = 0.31, p = 0.073).