“only marginally significant”

Severe preoperative LAVVR and AV valve abnormalities were only marginally significant ( P =0.07 and 0.19, respectively) ( Table 3 ).

The interaction was only marginally significant, F (4, 76)=2.20, p =.07, η p 2 =.10.

A Levene’s Test indicated that there was less variance in average ratings for structural interventions ( SD = 0.79) than individual interventions ( SD = 0.88), though this difference was only marginally significant ( F (279, 279) = 0.80, p = 0.07).

However, if we relied on a Poisson regression model the results were substantially lower and were only marginally significant for robberies (b=−0.02; p=0.07) and total violence (b=−0.01; p=0.09), reducing the respective incidence by 3% and 2%.

Based on the fitted model, group B had a significantly higher mean than group A ( p = 0.024) when adjusting for the other covariates, but overall, group is only marginally significant as a factor ( p = 0.07, based on a Wald test for the two group parameters).

In the daycare analysis, organized playtime was significantly higher than the next highest ranked, mealtime (F(1, 28) = 15.51, p = .0005), although this was only marginally significant in the home analysis (F(1, 38) = 3.47, p = .0701).

The association between baseline dNLR quartiles and pCR was only marginally significant ( p -value = 0.0706).

A main effect of group indicated that the overall magnitude of recovery was greater for bilinguals (M = −0.05) than for monolinguals (M = −0.02), although this effect was only marginally significant ( F (1, 48) = 3.42, p = 0.071, η 2 = 0.07).

Furthermore, among ASX treated patients, improvements in dyspnea and fatigue were statistically significant ( P < 0.001), while the increase in appetite was only marginally significant ( P = 0.071).

We do note that when analyzed by litter, reductions in ChAT + neuron counts within the dorsolateral and dorsomedial striatum were only marginally significant (DLS: t (7) = 2.13, p = 0.071; DMS: t (7) = 2.01, p = 0.085, Supplementary Table 1 ), despite being significant in animal-based analysis.

84.6%), though this difference was only marginally significant (χ 2 = 3.25, df = 1, p = 0.071).

Similarly, the model was only marginally significant for VH incongruent trials F (4, 118) = 2.22, p = 0.071 and accounted for 7% of the variability in reaction time.

Numerically, participants in the answer justification group ( M = 67%, SD = 17) scored higher than those in the MC-only group ( M = 61%, SD = 17), but the results were only marginally significant t (110) = 1.82, p = 0.071, d = 0.34. 3.2.2.

Although the group × time interaction was only marginally significant ( p = 0.071), exploratory analyses suggested a tendency for larger post-test P3 amplitudes in the Tai Chi training group, particularly for negative and neutral stimuli.

Regardless of the alignment of visual representations all networks produced the expected interactions of frequency by consistency (all p s < .05) and lexicality by length (all p s < .05), except for the left aligned (LA) version where the lexicality by length interaction was only marginally significant ( p = .071).

The interaction between BDI-II and 5-HTTLPR genotype in predicting alcohol problems (RAPI scores) was only marginally significant ( p = 0.071).

Although word and sentence counts were comparable, CHR participants produced slightly longer sentences (12.9 vs 11.7 words), an effect that was only marginally significant ( p = 0.071).

negative (0.06 ± 0.05) emotion expressions of ingroup politicians, although the comparison was only marginally significant, ( p = 0.071).

Consultation of print media, although only marginally significant ( p =0.071), trended toward being protective.

Relationships for the subcortical networks were only marginally significant (irregular: coefficient = −1.807, p value = 0.071; regular: coefficient = −1.666, p value = 0.096).

The interaction term for left-behind experience was positive but only marginally significant, β = 0.12, SE = 0.07, 95% CI [−0.01, 0.25], p = 0.071.

Late (250–600 ms) A repeated measures ANOVA indicated a medium but only marginally significant linear trend across the three emotion conditions (calm, happy, fear) from 250 to 600 ms after stimulus onset, F (1, 46) = 3.38, p =.072, η2 p =.10 (model controlled for child age and gender).

Using a linear combination post-estimation test, we find that the comparison between the indirect and direct empathy conditions is only marginally significant ( β = .749, p = .072).

The mediation analysis revealed that when social knowledge was included as a mediator between visual statistical learning and receptive language, the indirect pathway (ab = 0.065, S E = 2.80, 95% [1.181, 12.029]) was only marginally significant ( z = 1.80, p = 0.072), therefore providing evidence of directionality as proposed in the original model.

Although this increase of response priming was numerically still larger than the analogous alerting signal based increase for priming by novel primes, this difference was only marginally significant, F (1, 31) = 3.46, p = 0.072, η 2 p = 0.10.