“only marginally significant”

The difference in dynamic viscosity was only marginally significant in one study (P = 0.07), but it was insignificant in the other study (P = 0.2).

0.7; P =0.04), but this was only marginally significant at the final post-injury (median logMAR 3.0 vs. 0.5; P =0.07) evaluation.

CAD index itself was only marginally significant as a predictor of survival in this model ( p = 0.07 for rs1462845 and rs1915585 and p = 0.04 for rs6788787).

Total reading time analyses for the ADJ region yielded the same pattern but the effect was only marginally significant ( t = -1.85, p = 0.07).

However, this difference was only marginally significant ( p > 0.07).

The interaction (in the estimated time constant of adaptation) between group and condition (passive/active) was only marginally significant ( z = 1.8, p=0.07 Mann-Whitney U tests).

However, if we relied on a Poisson regression model the results were substantially lower and were only marginally significant for robberies (b=−0.02; p=0.07) and total violence (b=−0.01; p=0.09), reducing the respective incidence by 3% and 2%.

However, the predictor, participating in legal training organized by hospitals, was only marginally significant ( P =.07).

EAT – shoot – breakfast ) was most significant over left posterior electrodes ( t (91) = 4.87, p < 0.0001), and only marginally significant in left frontal electrodes ( t (91) = 2.14, p = 0.07).

However, when taking into account an equal frequency of NF- κ B positivity in the intestinal and mixed types of gastric carcinoma (44.44%), then the association between NF- κ B status and Lauren classification was only marginally significant ( P = 0.07).

Three patients in the IALA group while none in the FNB group achieved early ambulation, but this difference is only marginally significant ( P = 0.07) ( Table 3 ). 4.

The mediation effect of TA SB on perceived wellbeing and positive unwinding via PWC at six-months posttest was only marginally significant ( p = .07) although it was about the same size as one-month posttest.

Specifically, the interaction between COVID-19 stressors and parent depression/anxiety was only marginally significant ( p = 0.07) in predicting positive reinforcement.

In fact the corresponding effect in Japan was only marginally significant, β = −0.09, t (455) = 1.83, p < 0.07.

However, under kernel approach, the relationship between the proportion of species pairs with high trait overlap with species richness was only marginally significant for leaf size (r 2 = 0.14, p-value = 0.07 for leaf size, S6E Fig ) and none relationship was observed for SLA ( S6F Fig ).

(The tideflat model was only marginally significant when an outlier was removed ( R 2 adj = 0.28, P = 0.07, n = 10)).

By day 2, the difference was only marginally significant ( P = .07), and there was no significant difference in shoulder pain scores between the 2 groups after 2 days.

Social anxiety For IAS, a 2 × 2 ANOVA revealed that the interaction effect of time × group was significant, F (1,49) = 21.39, p <0.01, η p 2 = 0.30; the main effect of time was significant, F (1,49) = 4.97, p <0.01, η p 2 = 0.09; but the main effect of group was only marginally significant, F (1,49) = 3.41, p = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.07.

While fewer negative behaviors were observed in the treatment group, the difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.07).

This factor turned to be significant ( p < 0.05) for all system compartments except 15 N-chitin amended traps collected at final harvest, 8 weeks after assembling the large experimental pots, for which presence of AM fungus was only marginally significant ( p = 0.07).

In logistic regression the only independent predictor of LARC use was number of visits which was only marginally significant; aOR (95%CI): 1.41 (0.97–2.05; p = 0.07).

Percentage of alters in stress support networks with more experience than the ego was positively related to stress among egos who were not early-career educators ( β = 0.18, p < 0.05); the differential association between early and non-early career egos for more experience among stress support alters was only marginally significant for stress ( β = − 0.39, p = 0.07).

Articulatory suppression had only marginally significant main effects on AFD ( F = 3.31, P =0.070), ASA ( F = 3.35, P = 0.068), and FF ( F = 3.19, P = 0.075), but not on NF ( F = 0.10, P = 0.747), NS ( F = 0.19, P = 0.659), FS ( F = 0.64, P =0.423) or FD ( F = 0.26, P = 0.609).

The effect of target type was only marginally significant (b = -0.038, SE = 0.02, t(92) = -1.833, p = 0.070), and the interaction was not significant (b = 0.018, SE = 0.026, t(1367) = 0.728, p = 0.466).

Consistent with Experiment 1, there was a weak positive relationship between the false negative rate for a trial and the number of targets in the trial, which was only marginally significant in this experiment [ r (197) = 0.13, p = 0.07], and there was a significant negative relationship between the false positive rate and the number of targets in a trial, r (197) = −0.29, p < 0.001.