“only marginally significant”

Buying price proposals in markets dominated by asks were somewhat higher compared to their counterparts, though the effect was only marginally significant (mean proposed prices of 223.09±20.63 vs. 164.99±21.81, respectively; t (36) = 1.94, p = .07).

At four weeks, the electromyography amplitude recovery of the vibrissae function was greater in n‐acetyl‐cysteine treated rats (P=0.001), but the amplitude recovery difference in eye blink was only marginally significant between groups (p=0.07).

Further, although the interaction between student diversity and valuing diversity was only marginally significant (β = −1.55, p = .07, 95% CI [−3.22, 0.13]), simple slope analyses revealed that the positive association between valuing diversity and psychological distress for Youth of Color increased as schools become less diverse, and was only significant at lower levels of diversity.

On the other hand, the association between Aβ and temporal tau was higher in ADNI than POINTER (Fisher's z = 2.87, p = 0.004, based on ρ = 0.388 in ADNI and ρ = 0.230 in POINTER; Figure 2B ), but the cohort difference was only marginally significant in the Aβ+ individuals ( p = 0.07).

Chi-square analyses showed that the group difference for recognition of fear was only marginally significant, χ 2 < 3.36, p = .07.

Trust is also higher than the more-polarization condition (by 3.2% points), but the difference is only marginally significant ( p = 0.07).

The effect of altitude on replacement was only marginally significant at the national level (G = 8.53; P = 0.07) because patterns differed across regions (data not shown).

Furthermore, an increased mortality rate of nymphs (all instars included) was observed for both GxABT-1 and GHA (53.3% and 28.6% against 14.3% for control), although the difference was only marginally significant (GLMM: χ 2 = 5.30, df = 2, p = 0.07).

( 2012 ) the association between DRD2 A1 and SO was only marginally significant ( p = 0.07).

However, these increases were only marginally significant (p = 0.070).

In the fifth review, a significant difference between experimental and control interventions was detected when all trials were synthesized that became only marginally significant (p < .07) when the meta-analysis was adjusted for study quality [ 30 ].

The MBSR group and the passive group comparison was only marginally significant (F (1, 32) = 3.64, p = .07, η p 2 = .10), yet the intervention groups (CPAT and MBSR) did not differ in their gains (F (1, 29) = 0.04, p = .84, η p 2 = .01).

The PCRT+ group also had a slightly higher permanent stoma rate than the PCRT– group in patients with shorter than median interspinous distance (ISD), but the difference was only marginally significant ( P = 0.07).

(The tideflat model was only marginally significant when an outlier was removed ( R 2 adj = 0.28, P = 0.07, n = 10)).

A direct comparison between the amusic and control group using an independent-samples t -test revealed a larger N1 response to negative words for amusic participants, M = −0.40, SE = 0.09, as compared to control participants, M = −0.14, SE = 0.11, at posterior electrode sites; however, this difference was only marginally significant, t (40) = 1.88, p = 0.07, d = 0.29.

Based on the fitted model, group B had a significantly higher mean than group A ( p = 0.024) when adjusting for the other covariates, but overall, group is only marginally significant as a factor ( p = 0.07, based on a Wald test for the two group parameters).

The main effect of Group was only marginally significant, F (2, 65) = 2.72, p = 0.07, and the interactions between Cue and Group and between Deception and Cue were not significant, both F s < 1.

The same association is seen for those relatives who are also frequently contacted, though it is only marginally significant (chi-square association significance p = 0.07).

With respect to epidemiological characteristics with binomial values, Fusobacterium was associated with alcohol consumption and KRAS mutation ( P = 0.088 and P = 0.094), and Parvimonas was associated with tumor location and KRAS mutation, although the difference was only marginally significant ( P = 0.070, Table 4 ).

In this model, all other relations between maternal/pregnancy characteristics and sUA levels remained similar to those reported in Table 2 , except the interaction between Fetal Sex and the Morning Slope of sUA was not statistically significant nor trending and the interaction between Maternal Age and Pregnancy Stage was only marginally significant ( b =-0.05, SE=0.03, p =0.07, 95% CI [-0.10, 0.004]).

However, the difference in the lengths of their current romantic relationships was only marginally significant, t (1020) = −1.83, p = .07.

The difference in dynamic viscosity was only marginally significant in one study (P = 0.07), but it was insignificant in the other study (P = 0.2).

The analyses (see Supplementary Tables 3a, b ) revealed that the contribution of RAN did not significantly predict Word Reading fluency ( t = 1.56, p = 0.12, R p 2 = 0.03), and its effect on Syllable Reading fluency was only marginally significant ( t = 1.83, p = 0.07, R p 2 = 0.03).

0.7; P =0.04), but this was only marginally significant at the final post-injury (median logMAR 3.0 vs. 0.5; P =0.07) evaluation.

However, the predictor, participating in legal training organized by hospitals, was only marginally significant ( P =.07).