“only marginally significant”

Differences among the quartiles in advanced understanding were only marginally significant ( F (3,135) = 2.52, p = 0.06; Figure 6 ).

Also, the effect of family income-to-needs ratio on sUA concentrations at the 6-month assessment was statistically significant in the complete case model ( Supplementary Table S3 ), but only marginally significant in the model employing MI ( b = −0.06, robust SE = 0.03, p = 0.06, 95% CI [−0.13, 0.001]).

The two-way interaction was only marginally significant, F (1,9) = 4.61, p = .060.

Maternal years of education tended to moderate the association between maternal PPD and children’s outcomes as well, but the interaction was only marginally significant (β = −.08, 95% CI −0.16 to 0.00, p = .06).

Wood consumption was higher in females (15.8±14.0%) than in males (5.2±3.6%), but this pattern was only marginally significant (SEX; χ 2 = 3.5, df = 1, P = 0.06).

SNP rs761100 was only marginally significant ( t = 1.9, p = 0.06).

Finally, AP-LM latency differences also tended to predict variations observed in DTI, but the relationship was only marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

According to univariate analysis, the lead-induced latency increase was significant for peak II in the high-lead group [F(2,13) = 5.14; p < 0.05] at rate conditions, but only marginally significant at conditions of intensity variation [F(2,13) = 3.66; p < 0.06].

Whilst only marginally significant ( p = 0.06; Figure 4e , Supporting Information: Figure S11 , Supporting Information: Table S3 ) g s T opt of drought‐intolerant species tended to downregulate in the TFE compared to the control, indicating that even at optimal temperatures for photosynthesis, drought‐intolerant species are tending towards a more water conservative stomatal strategy in the TFE.

In 1997, a second official study reported a 50% increased leukemia risk for this target group, which was only marginally significant ( P = 0.060).

The analysis revealed a significant difference between leverage and eigenvector centrality (p = 0.021), while the difference between degree and eigenvector centrality was only marginally significant (p = 0.06).

Moreover, the 2*5 interaction effect was only marginally significant, F (3.83, 1318.04) = 2.27, p = .06, η 2 = .01.

Univariate multiple linear regressions indicated that the interaction predicted P200 to positive stimuli over the right hemisphere ( B = –0.54, Δ R 2 = 0.05, p = 0.05), and predicted P200 to each condition (including neutral) over the left hemisphere, though the positive condition was only marginally significant (positive: B = –0.50, Δ R 2 = 0.04, p = 0.06; neutral: B = –0.56, Δ R 2 = 0.05, p = 0.03; negative: B = –0.74, Δ R 2 = 0.07, p = 0.01).

The only marginally significant association (though small effect size) evident was between gender and the pass/fail rate of the case scenario assessment ( χ 2 (1) = 3.61, p = 0.06, Cramer's V = 0.04).

However, in the second model, which excluded antenatal levels of blood manganese but included levels of cord blood manganese during birth, the coefficient was of similar magnitude but was only marginally significant for both cognitive (B = -2.20, p = 0.06) and language skills (B = -2.17, p = 0.08). 3.2.2 Non-significant findings The three studies that did not find a significant association between antenatal depression and cognitive outcomes received good [ 53 ] and fair [ 48 , 54 ] quality ratings.

Only for one single comparison, NN-W-P1 versus CTD , the difference was only marginally significant (p < 0.06).

The fully adjusted effect size of the CTQ total score was slightly larger but remained only marginally significant (β = 0.25 [95% CI: −0.01 to 0.49], t = 1.64, p = 0.06).

P-content (percent of dry mass) was relatively high in normal samples ( Figure 1A ) from both kidney and liver (∼0.75–0.85%) compared to samples from colon and lung (∼0.55%), although this overall difference was only marginally significant (p = 0.06).

However, when comparing the intention-to-treat approach with the per-protocol analysis, slightly differing results emerged (ITT: significant main effects of interactions between footbath condition and time ( F (4, 317) = 2.96, p =0.02) and between health status and time ( F (2, 317) = 3.65, p =0.03); PP: both interactions were only marginally significant (footbath condition x time: F (2, 277) = 2.31, p =0.06; health status × time: F (2, 277) = 3.02, p =0.05)). 3.7.

On the other hand, the interaction was only marginally significant when limited to the two-flanker and four-flanker conditions, F (1, 8) = 5.04, p = 0.06, and was in the opposite direction.

Although nicotine exposure did increase the abundance of the α4- and β2-nAChR subunits, the increase was only marginally significant (Chrna4: F (1,13) = 4.93, p = 0.06; Chrnb2: F (1,13) = 4.67, p = 0.07), likely due to the small number of pools included in the analysis.

In agreement with previous studies in the maritime Antarctic that have found no influence of soil pH on soil bacterial alpha diversity or community composition 10 , 15 , or in which pH has been identified as an only marginally significant predictor ( P > 0.06) for the frequencies of C and N cycling genes 14 , soil pH had no influence on bacterial alpha or beta diversity in the present study.

77.7%, p = 0.02), whereas perceived severity was only marginally significant (91.1% vs. 78.5%, p = 0.06).

The effect of affective reaction on sunk-cost scores was only marginally significant under low cognitive load, β = .21, t (123) = 1.90, p = .060, η p 2 = .05.

However, the p-values were only marginally significant (p≤0.06).