No gender differences were observed in family–work conflict and opinions about remote work, whereas women showed greater remote work engagement than men, although the difference was only marginally significant ( M w = 3.15; M m = 2.92; F = 3.42, p = .06).
← all phrases
“only marginally significant”
Sighted at
p<1.0p=0.9
In the literature
Among males the difference between the symptomatic and asymptomatic COVID‐19 groups is highly significant (Kruskal p = .0005), while in females, it is weak and only marginally significant (Kruskal p = .06).
Among patients with FLT3 -ITD +, all patients benefited from HSCT irrespective of IL1R1 expression, although the benefit was only marginally significant in patients with IL1R1 low (HR for OS 0.41, p = 0.06).
The only marginally significant association (though small effect size) evident was between gender and the pass/fail rate of the case scenario assessment ( χ 2 (1) = 3.61, p = 0.06, Cramer's V = 0.04).
A similar trend was also noted in children aged 1 year but demonstrated only marginally significant ( p value = 0.06).
[ 15 ] was excluded, the effect size became only marginally significant ( p = 0.06), reflecting that the current evidence base is still insufficient.
Stressed KO also interacted more with the social target than stressed WT, although this effect was only marginally significant ( p = 0.06), potentially due to the abovementioned higher variability in the KO group.
S4), was associated with increased community change, although this association was only marginally significant ( P = 0.06, Fig.
Results indicated significant differences for allocation to spouse, F (2, 417) = 9.30, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.04, but only marginally significant for allocation to parent, F (2, 417) = 2.80, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 01. and child [ F (2, 417) = 2.80, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.01].
The difference between conditions 3 and 4 was only marginally significant, F (1, 365) = 3.70, MSE = 0.73, p = .06, η p 2 = .02.
However, the simple slope was only marginally significant ( p = .06).
HIV infection was the only marginally significant independent predictor of survival probability on the acute admission ward (hazards ratio 2.87, P = 0.06).
Additionally, LDHA levels were decreased in rod Shp2 −/− retinas compared to Shp2 flox/flox retinas, though this difference was only marginally significant ( p < 0.06).
Reported observation of stigma and discrimination incidents fell by 7.4 percentage points more among intervention than comparison facility respondents, though only marginally significant in the IPTW‐adjusted model ( p = 0.06).
A total of 21.6% of the variance of metaphor comprehension was explained ( p < .04), with analogical reasoning being the variable with more weight at this age, although only marginally significant (β = .336, p < .06).
We determined that Keratin 39 overall was only marginally significant (P = 0.06; 0.8 power n = 15; 0.9 power n = 20) ( Fig 2 ).
Maternal years of education tended to moderate the association between maternal PPD and children’s outcomes as well, but the interaction was only marginally significant (β = −.08, 95% CI −0.16 to 0.00, p = .06).
Differences among the quartiles in advanced understanding were only marginally significant ( F (3,135) = 2.52, p = 0.06; Figure 6 ).
For the easy level (Range 1), the model was not significant F (5,45) = 1.13, p > 0.05, and the only marginally significant predictor was performance IQ of the WASI ( β = −0.25, p = 0.06).
Among the females, the risk of occupational injury was tended to increase with job tenure (i.e., 2.5% in those with job tenure of less than a year; 2.4% in those with 1–4 years; 3.5% in those with 5–9 years; and 5.4% in those with 10 years or more), although the difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.060).
Wood consumption was higher in females (15.8±14.0%) than in males (5.2±3.6%), but this pattern was only marginally significant (SEX; χ 2 = 3.5, df = 1, P = 0.06).
As presented in Table 2 , having blood group B or Rh-negative blood could be preventive against death, although this prevention was only marginally significant ( P = 0.06).
The weight of the 33‐Hz oscillator was significantly lower than the one of the 17‐Hz one for the NR group ( Z = 6.39, p < .001), whereas the difference between weights was only marginally significant for the DYS ( z = 1.87, p = .06).
According to univariate analysis, the lead-induced latency increase was significant for peak II in the high-lead group [F(2,13) = 5.14; p < 0.05] at rate conditions, but only marginally significant at conditions of intensity variation [F(2,13) = 3.66; p < 0.06].
Noteworthily, a negative association (although only marginally significant, p = 0.06) was identified between upstream wetlands and geometric mean concentrations of E. coli for all sampling events.